Abstract
In medical image segmentation with deep learning, large amounts of annotated data are needed to train precise models. Such annotations are timeconsuming and costly to create, since medical experts need to ensure their quality. Active learning techniques may reduce the expert effort. In this work, we compare different sample selection strategies for training a model for breast segmentation in MR images using 3D U-Nets: We evaluate two uncertainty-based approaches that compute the voxel-wise entropy or epistemic uncertainty based on a Bayesian neural network approximated via Monte Carlo dropout and compare them against a random selection as baseline. We find that both uncertainty-based approaches improve over the baseline in the earlier iterations, but lead to a similar performance in the long run. In early iterations they are 2-4 active learning iterations ahead of the "random selection" strategy, which corresponds to one or several days of saved annotation time.We also assess how well the different uncertainty measures correlate with the segmentation quality and find that epistemic uncertainty is a better surrogate measure than the commonly used plain entropy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhang J, Saha A, Zhu Z, Mazurowski MA. Hierarchical convolutional neural networks for segmentation of breast tumors in MRI with application to radiogenomics. Proc IEEE. 2018;38(2):435–47.
Nam Y, Park GE, Kang J, Kim SH. Fully automatic assessment of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI using machine-learning models. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;53(3):818–26.
Gal Y, Islam R, Ghahramani Z. Deep bayesian active learning with image data. Proc ICML. 2017:1183–92.
Chlebus G, Schenk A, Hahn HK, Van Ginneken B, Meine H. Robust segmentation models using an uncertainty slice sampling-based annotation workflow. Proc IEEE. 2022;10:4728– 38.
Lakshminarayanan B, Pritzel A, Blundell C. Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2017;30.
Wang G, Li W, Aertsen M, Deprest J, Ourselin S, Vercauteren T. Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networks. Neurocomputing. 2019;338:34–45.
Gal Y, Ghahramani Z. Dropout as a bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. Proc IEEE. 2016:1050–9.
Roy AG, Conjeti S, Navab N,Wachinger C. Inherent brain segmentation quality control from fully convnet monte carlo sampling. Proc IEEE. 2018:664–72.
Kendall A, Gal Y. What uncertainties do we need in bayesian deep learning for computer vision? Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2017;30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Geißler, K., Wenzel, M., Diekmann, S., von Busch, H., Grimm, R., Meine, H. (2024). Application of Active Learning-based on Uncertainty Quantification to Breast Segmentation in MRI. In: Maier, A., Deserno, T.M., Handels, H., Maier-Hein, K., Palm, C., Tolxdorff, T. (eds) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2024. BVM 2024. Informatik aktuell. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-44037-4_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-44037-4_52
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-44036-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-44037-4
eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)