Abstract
Online retailers employ recommendation agents (RAs) to provide product recommendations with the objectives of not only to support consumers’ decision-making but also to influence their decisions of product choice. However, some empirical studies have found that product recommendations are not always well accepted by consumers. While one cause for the non-acceptance might be the poor personalization of the product recommendations as suggested by prior studies, another plausible cause would be the failure in providing a product recommendation in the wrong way and/or at the wrong time. Building on the theoretical lens of Preference Inconsistency Paradox, this study seeks to investigate how a RA could offer recommendations based on product reviews (i.e., the basis of a recommendation) and at the juncture when consumers are most receptive to (i.e., the timing). A controlled laboratory experiment was subsequently conducted. The results reveal that the basis and time of recommendations could lead to varying impacts on a consumer’s decision satisfaction and decision difficulty. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Häubl, G., Murray, K.B.: Double agents. MIT Sloan Management Review 47, 8–12 (2006)
Fitzsimons, G.J., Lehmann, D.R.: Reactance to Recommendations: When Unsolicited Advice Yields Contrary Responses. Market Sci. 23, 82–94 (2004)
Ha, L.: Observations: Advertising clutter in consumer magazines: Dimensions and effects. J. Advertising Res. 36, 76–84 (1996)
Chan, J.C.F., Jiang, Z.H., Tan, B.C.Y.: Understanding Online Interruption-Based Advertising: Impacts of Exposure Timing, Advertising Intent, and Brand Image. IEEE T. Eng. Manage 57, 365–379 (2010)
Ho, S.Y., Bodoff, D., Tam, K.Y.: Timing of Adaptive Web Personalization and Its Effects on Online Consumer Behavior. Inform Syst. Res. 22, 660–679 (2011)
Chen, Y., Xie, J.: Third-Party Product Review and Firm Marketing Strategy. Market Sci. 24, 218–240 (2005)
Chen, Y.B., Xie, J.H.: Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a news element of marketing communication mix. Manage Sci. 54, 477–491 (2008)
Kahn, B.E., Lehmann, D.R.: Modeling Choice among Assortments. J. Retailing 67, 274–299 (1991)
Broniarczyk, S.M., Hoyer, W.D., McAlister, L.: Consumers’ perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: The impact of item reduction. J. Marketing Res. 35, 166–176 (1998)
Iyengar, S.S., Lepper, M.R.: When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79, 995–1006 (2000)
Chernev, A.: Decision focus and consumer choice among assortments. J. Consum Res. 33, 50–59 (2006)
Chernev, A.: Product assortment and individual decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85, 151–162 (2003b)
Gensch, D.H., Javalgi, R.G.: The Influence of Involvement on Disaggregate Attribute Choice Models. J. Consum Res. 14, 71–82 (1987)
Moe, W.W.: An empirical two-stage choice model with varying decision rules applied to Internet clickstream data. J. Marketing Res. 43, 680–692 (2006)
Bulbul, C.: When consumers choose to restrict their options: Influence of concrete and abstract regret on choice set size preference. Graduate School of Business Administration, vol. Ph. D, p. 86. New York University, New York (2007)
Botti, S., Iyengar, S.S.: The Psychological Pleasure and Pain of Choosing: When People Prefer Choosing at the Cost of Subsequent Outcome Satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87, 312–326 (2004)
Bown, N.J., Read, D., Summers, B.: The lure of choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 16, 297–308 (2003)
Huffman, C., Kahn, B.E.: Variety for Sale: Mass customization or mass confusion? J. Retailing 74, 491–513 (1998)
Jacoby, J., Speller, D.E., Berning, C.K.: Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load: Replication and Extension. The Journal of Consumer Research 1, 33–42 (1974)
Malhotra, N.K.: Information Load and Consumer Decision Making. The Journal of Consumer Research 8, 419–430 (1982)
Simonson, I.: Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects. The Journal of Consumer Research 16, 158–174 (1989)
Dhar, R.: Consumer preference for a no-choice option. J. Consum Res. 24, 215–231 (1997)
Greenleaf, E.A., Lehmann, D.R.: Reasons for Substantial Delay in Consumer Decision Making. The Journal of Consumer Research 22, 186–199 (1995)
Luce, M.F., Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R.: Emotional Trade-off Difficulty and Choice. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research 36, 143 (1999)
Bettman, J.R., Luce, M.F., Payne, J.W.: Constructive consumer choice processes. The Journal of Consumer Research 25, 187–217 (1998)
Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A.L., Roundtree, R.I., Bitner, M.J.: Self-service technologies: understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. The Journal of Marketing 64, 50–64 (2000)
Devaraj, S., Fan, M., Kohli, R.: Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics. Inform Syst. Res. 13, 316–333 (2002)
Hoyer, W.D.: An Examination of Consumer Decision Making for a Common Repeat Purchase Product. The Journal of Consumer Research 11, 822–829 (1984)
Hsee, C.K.: Elastic Justification: How Tempting but Task-Irrelevant Factors Influence Decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 62, 330–337 (1995)
Bickart, B., Schindler, R.M.: Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. J. Interact Mark 15, 31–40 (2001)
Sela, A., Berger, J.: Justification and Choice. Advances in Consumer Research 36, 27–27 (2009)
Burson, K.A., Botti, S.: Choice Satisfaction Can Be the Luck of the Draw. Advances in Consumer Research 36 (2009)
Bottomley, P.A., Doyle, J.R., Green, R.H.: Testing the reliability of weight elicitation methods: Direct rating versus point allocation. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research 37, 508 (2000)
Steenkamp, J.-B., Van Trijp, H.: Attribute Elicitation in Marketing Research: A Comparison of Three Procedures. Marketing Letters 8, 153–165 (1997)
Kivetz, R., Zheng, Y.H.: Determinants of justification and self-control. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen 135, 572–587 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shi, A., Tan, CH., Sia, C.L. (2013). Timing and Basis of Online Product Recommendation: The Preference Inconsistency Paradox. In: Yamamoto, S. (eds) Human Interface and the Management of Information. Information and Interaction for Learning, Culture, Collaboration and Business,. HIMI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8018. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39226-9_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39226-9_58
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39225-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39226-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)