Abstract
This paper provides a general semantic framework for nonmonotonic reasoning, based on a minimal models semantics on the top of KLM systems for nonmonotonic reasoning. This general framework can be instantiated in order to provide a semantic reconstruction within modal logic of the notion of rational closure, introduced by Lehmann and Magidor. We give two characterizations of rational closure: the first one in terms of minimal models where propositional interpretations associated to worlds are fixed along minimization, the second one where they are allowed to vary. In both cases a knowledge base must be expanded with a suitable set of consistency assumptions, represented by negated conditionals. The correspondence between rational closure and minimal model semantics suggests the possibility of defining variants of rational closure by changing either the underlying modal logic or the comparison relation on models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Booth, R., Paris, J.B.: A note on the rational closure of knowledge bases with both positive and negative knowledge. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7, 165–190 (1998)
Boutilier, C.: Conditional logics of normality: a modal approach. Artificial Intelligence 68(1), 87–154 (1994)
Casini, G., Straccia, U.: Rational Closure for Defeasible Description Logics. In: Janhunen, T., Niemelä, I. (eds.) JELIA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6341, pp. 77–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Friedman, N., Halpern, J.Y.: Plausibility measures and default reasoning. Journal of the ACM 48(4), 648–685 (2001)
Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L.: A Nonmonotonic Extension of KLM Preferential Logic P. In: Fermüller, C.G., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR-17. LNCS, vol. 6397, pp. 317–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L.: A minimal model semantics for rational closure. In: Rosati, R., Woltran, S. (eds.) 14th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, NMR 2012, Roma, Italy (2012)
Kraus, S., Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence 44(1-2), 167–207 (1990)
Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: What does a conditional knowledge base entail? Artificial Intelligence 55(1), 1–60 (1992)
Pearl, J.: System Z: A natural ordering of defaults with tractable applications to nonmonotonic reasoning. In: Parikh, R. (ed.) TARK (3rd Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge), pp. 121–135. Morgan Kaufmann, Pacific Grove (1990)
Pearl, J., Goldszmidt, M.: On the relation between rational closure and System-Z. In: NMR 1990 (3rd Int. W. on Non-Monotonic Reasoning), South Lake Tahoe, California, USA (1990)
Spohn, W.: Ordinal conditional functions: A dynamic theory of epistemic states. In: Harper, W.L., Skyrms, B. (eds.) Causation in Decision, Belief Change, and Statistics, pp. 105–134. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L. (2012). A Minimal Model Semantics for Nonmonotonic Reasoning. In: del Cerro, L.F., Herzig, A., Mengin, J. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7519. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33352-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33353-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)