Abstract
In this paper, a new method was presented for multiple attribute group decision making. In the proposed method, the comprehensive evaluation value of each attribute was obtained by set-valued statistics model, and the ranking of all alternatives was judged by the information axiom. Finally, a software product evaluation case was given, and the case was calculated by the proposed method and traditional method. The result illustrates the feasibility and applicability of the proposed method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kim, S.H., Choi, S.H., Kim, J.K.: An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information: Range-based approach. European Journal of Operation Research 118, 139–152 (1999)
Hwang, C.L., Lin, M.J.: Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications. Springer, New York (1987)
Suh, N.P.: Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)
Kulak, O., Cebi, S., Kahraman, C.: Applications of axiomatic design principles: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications 37, 6705–6717 (2010)
Babic, B.: Axiomatic design of flexible manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research 5, 1159–1173 (1999)
Kulak, O.: A decision support system for fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling equipments. Expert Systems with Applications 29, 310–319 (2005)
Kulak, O., Kahraman, C.: Multi-attribute Comparison of Advanced Manufacturing Systems using Fuzzy vs. Crisp Axiomatic Design Approach. International Journal of Production Economics 95, 415–424 (2005)
Coelho, A.M.G.: Axiomatic design as support for decision-making in a design for manufacturing context: A case study. International Journal of Production Economics 109, 81–89 (2007)
Kahraman, C., Cebi, S.: A new multi-attribute decision making method: Hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 4848–4861 (2009)
Celik, M., Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Er, I.D.: Fuzzy axiomatic design-based performance evaluation model for docking facilities in shipbuilding industry: The case of Turkish shipyards. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 599–615 (2009)
Sun, Y.F., Chen, S.Q., Wu, J.P.: Set-Valued Statistics based fuzzy neural expert evaluation system and its application. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics 15, 97–101 (2001)
CMU/SEI, CMM (2001)
Boehm, B.W., Brown, J.R., Lipow, M.: Quantitative evaluation of software quality. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Long Beach (1976)
McCall, J.A., Richards, P.K., Walters, G.F.: Factors in software quality, Vol. I, II, III, Final Technical Report, RADC-TR-77-369.Rome Air Development Center, Air Force Systems Command, Griffiss Air Force Base (1977)
Software Product Evaluation-Quality Characteristics and Guideline for Their Use. ISO/IEC Standard ISO-9126 (1991)
Chen, C., Guo, J.W., Zhao, C.X.: A method of equipment software quality evaluation based on AHP-ELECTRE. Acta Armamentarii 31, 1481–1486 (2010)
Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1980)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lin, J., You, H. (2012). An Approach for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Based on Information Axiom. In: Shaw, M.J., Zhang, D., Yue, W.T. (eds) E-Life: Web-Enabled Convergence of Commerce, Work, and Social Life. WEB 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 108. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29873-8_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29873-8_34
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29872-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29873-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)