An Approach for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Based on Information Axiom | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

An Approach for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Based on Information Axiom

  • Conference paper
E-Life: Web-Enabled Convergence of Commerce, Work, and Social Life (WEB 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 108))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2086 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, a new method was presented for multiple attribute group decision making. In the proposed method, the comprehensive evaluation value of each attribute was obtained by set-valued statistics model, and the ranking of all alternatives was judged by the information axiom. Finally, a software product evaluation case was given, and the case was calculated by the proposed method and traditional method. The result illustrates the feasibility and applicability of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim, S.H., Choi, S.H., Kim, J.K.: An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information: Range-based approach. European Journal of Operation Research 118, 139–152 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hwang, C.L., Lin, M.J.: Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications. Springer, New York (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Suh, N.P.: Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kulak, O., Cebi, S., Kahraman, C.: Applications of axiomatic design principles: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications 37, 6705–6717 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Babic, B.: Axiomatic design of flexible manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research 5, 1159–1173 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kulak, O.: A decision support system for fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling equipments. Expert Systems with Applications 29, 310–319 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kulak, O., Kahraman, C.: Multi-attribute Comparison of Advanced Manufacturing Systems using Fuzzy vs. Crisp Axiomatic Design Approach. International Journal of Production Economics 95, 415–424 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coelho, A.M.G.: Axiomatic design as support for decision-making in a design for manufacturing context: A case study. International Journal of Production Economics 109, 81–89 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahraman, C., Cebi, S.: A new multi-attribute decision making method: Hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 4848–4861 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Celik, M., Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Er, I.D.: Fuzzy axiomatic design-based performance evaluation model for docking facilities in shipbuilding industry: The case of Turkish shipyards. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 599–615 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, Y.F., Chen, S.Q., Wu, J.P.: Set-Valued Statistics based fuzzy neural expert evaluation system and its application. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics 15, 97–101 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. CMU/SEI, CMM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boehm, B.W., Brown, J.R., Lipow, M.: Quantitative evaluation of software quality. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Long Beach (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCall, J.A., Richards, P.K., Walters, G.F.: Factors in software quality, Vol. I, II, III, Final Technical Report, RADC-TR-77-369.Rome Air Development Center, Air Force Systems Command, Griffiss Air Force Base (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Software Product Evaluation-Quality Characteristics and Guideline for Their Use. ISO/IEC Standard ISO-9126 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, C., Guo, J.W., Zhao, C.X.: A method of equipment software quality evaluation based on AHP-ELECTRE. Acta Armamentarii 31, 1481–1486 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lin, J., You, H. (2012). An Approach for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Based on Information Axiom. In: Shaw, M.J., Zhang, D., Yue, W.T. (eds) E-Life: Web-Enabled Convergence of Commerce, Work, and Social Life. WEB 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 108. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29873-8_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29873-8_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29872-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29873-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics