A Critical Analysis of EU-Funded eParticipation | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

A Critical Analysis of EU-Funded eParticipation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance

Abstract

This chapter reflects, from a holistic perspective, on the challenges surrounding the development of eParticipation in Europe, with special focus on EU programmes. To this end, first, we assess the field’s practical and theoretical achievements and limitations, and corroborate that the progress of eParticipation in the last decade has not been completely satisfactory in spite of the significant share of resources invested to support it. Second, we attempt to diagnose and shed light on some of the field’s systemic problems and challenges which are responsible for this lack of development. The domain’s maladies are grouped under tree main categories: (1) lack of a proper understanding and articulation with regard to the ‘participation’ field, (2) eParticipation community’s ‘founding biases’ around eGovernment and academy, and (3) inadequacy of traditional innovation support programmes to incentivize innovation in the field. In the context of the ‘Europe 2020 Strategy’, the final section provides several recommendations that should contribute to enhance the effectiveness of future European eParticipation actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.demo-net.org/. Accessed 10 Oct 2011.

  2. 2.

    http://islab.uom.gr/eP/. Accessed 10 Oct 2011.

  3. 3.

    http://www.ep-momentum.eu/. Accessed 10 Oct 2011.

  4. 4.

    http://crossroad.epu.ntua.gr/. Accessed 10 Oct 2011.

  5. 5.

    http://pep-net.eu/. Accessed 10 Oct 2011.

  6. 6.

    http://www.gov2u.org/gov2DemOSS/index.htm.

  7. 7.

    http://www.demosatwork.org/.

  8. 8.

    http://citizenscape.org/.

References

  • Aichholzer G, Westholm H (2009) Evaluating eParticipation projects: practical examples and outline of an evaluation framework. Eur J ePrac 7:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht S, Kohlrausch N, Kubicek H (2008) eParticipation – electronic participation of citizens and the business community in eGovernment. University of Bremen, Bremen

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie E, Cowling E, Nissen N (2009) Understanding participation: a literature review. Pathways Through Participation, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns A, Swift A (2010) g4c2c: enabling citizen engagement at arms’ length from government. EDem 3(1):57–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick A (2009) Web 2.0: new challenges for the study of e-Democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S J Law Policy Inf Soc 5(1):9–41

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Charalabidis Y, Gionis G, Ferro E (2010) Towards a systematic exploitation of Web 2.0 and simulation modeling tools in public policy process. In: Macintosh A, Tambouris E (eds) LNCS 6229, proceedings of ePart 2010. Springer, Lausanne, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrissafis T, Rohen M (2010) European eParticipation developments: from ad hoc experiences towards mass engagement. J eDemocr 2(2):89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • CitizenScape (2010a) D2.1.2: monitoring and evaluation report. http://citizenscape.org/consortium-area/wp3.3-project-management-coordination-liaison-with/deliverables. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • CitizenScape (2010b) D3.4: final report. http://citizenscape.org/news/citizenscape-public-final-report. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • CitizenScape (2010c) Lessons learnt from CitizenScape Pilot trials. http://citizenscape.org/news/lessons-learnt-from-citizenscape-pilot-trials. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • CoE (2009) Electronic democracy (e-democracy). Recommendation CM/Rec(2009), adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. Council of Europe, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman S (2006) Democracy in the Internet age (speech). e-Governance Academy, Tallinn

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman S, Kaposi I (2009) A study of e-participation projects in third-wave democracies. Int J Electron Govern 2(4):302–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall A, Romano J, Shankland A (2008) Brazilian experiences of participation and citizen-ship: a critical look. Discussion Paper. IDS, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • CROSSROAD (2010) Final roadmap on ICT for governance and policy modelling. http://crossroad.epu.ntua.gr/files/2010/02/CROSSROAD_D4.3_Final_Roadmap_Report-v1.00.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • CROSSROAD (2011) Final policy recommendations on ICT for governance and policy modelling. http://crossroad.epu.ntua.gr/files/2010/02/CROSSROAD_D4.4_Policy_Recommendations-v2.00.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • De Cindio F, Peraboni CF (2009) e-Participation at the urban level. In: Macintosh A, Tambouris E (eds) LNCS 5694, proceedings of ePart 2009. Springer, Linz, pp 112–124

    Google Scholar 

  • eGovMoNet (2010) D3.3: eGovernment monitor network, impact measurement methodology. eGovMoNet Consortium

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2011) Online database of EU research projects. http://cordis.europa.eu/. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • European Commission (2009) Ministerial declaration on eGovernment. Malmö. http://www.egov2009.se/wp-content/uploads/Ministerial-Declaration-on-eGovernment.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • European Commission (2010) Interim evaluation of the seventh framework programme. Report of the expert group. European Commission, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/pdf/archive/other_reports_studies_and_documents/fp7_interim_evaluation_expert_group_report.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • European Commission (2011a) Green paper. From challenges to opportunities: towards a common strategic framework for EU research and innovation funding. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/research/csfri/pdf/com_2011_0048_csf_green_paper_en.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • European Commission (2011b) http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/11/59&type=HTML. Innovation – key issues for the European Council. European Commission, Brussels. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • European eParticipation (2009a) D1.1: major factors shaping the development of eParticipation. European eParticipation Study. http://islab.uom.gr/eP/. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • European eParticipation (2009b) D1.3: main benefits of eParticipation developments in the EU. European eParticipation Study. http://islab.uom.gr/eP/. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • European eParticipation (2009c) D5.1: eParticipation recommendations – focusing on the European level. European eParticipation Study. http://islab.uom.gr/eP/. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • European eParticipation (2009d) D7.5: final report. European eParticipation Study. http://islab.uom.gr/eP/. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • European eParticipation (2009e) Summary report. Study and supply of services on the development of eParticipation in the EU. European Commission, Brussels. http://islab.uom.gr/eP/. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • FEED (2009) D1.1: end-user characteristics and system actors. http://www.feed-project.eu/files/FEED_D1_1_End-user%20Characteristics%20and%20System%20Actors.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • Ferro E, Molinari F (2010) Framing Web 2.0 in the process of public sector innovation: going down the participation ladder. Eur J ePrac 9:20–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Freschi AC, Medaglia R, Nørbjerg J (2009) eParticipation in the institutional domain: a review of research. DEMO-Net, Bergamo

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa J, Barret G (2010) So what difference does it make? Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. Citizenship, participation and accountability. IDS, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler J, Shadbolt N, Hall W, Berners-Lee T, Weitzner D (2008) Web science: an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the web. Commun ACM 51(7):60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe C (2009) Building the virtual town hall: civic architecture for cyberspace. Public-i, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  • Ideal-EU (2009) D6.9: final dissemination report. Ideal-EU Consortium

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston P (2010) Transforming government’s policy-making processes. Why encouraging more and easier citizen input into policy-making is not enough. JeDEM 2(2):162–169

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa B (2008) eParticipation evaluation and impact. DEMO-Net, Bremen

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintosh A, Coleman S (2006) Multidisciplinary roadmap and report on eParticipation research. DEMO-Net, Bergamo

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintosh A, Coleman S, Schneeberger A (2009) eParticipation: the research gaps. In: Macintosh A, Tambouris E (eds) LNCS 5694, proceedings of ePart 2009. Springer, Linz, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier E, Reimer U (2010) Process support for increasing participation in eParticipation. J eDemocr 2(1):46–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Medaglia R (2007) The challenged identity of a field: the state of the art of eParticipation research. Inf Polity 12:169–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Millard J, Meyerhoff Nielsen M (2010) European status of e-participation and what is needed to optimise future Benefits? Paper presented at the EDem 2010, Krems

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinari F (2010) On sustainable participation. In: Macintosh A, Tambouris E, Glassey O (eds) LNCS 6229, proceedings of ePart 2010. Springer, Lausanne, pp 126–139

    Google Scholar 

  • MOMENTUM (2010) D2.7: eParticipation projects consolidated results V.3. http://www.ep-momentum.eu/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=T8o4VgJp7oU%3D&tabid=57&mid=492. Accessed 5 Oct 2011

  • NCDD (2009) Core principles for public engagement. National Coalition for Dialogue & Deliberation, Boiling Springs

    Google Scholar 

  • Osimo D (2009) A short history of government 2.0: from cool projects to policy impact. In: Gøtze J, Pedersen CB (eds) State of the eUnion. Government 2.0 and onwards. 21gov.net, Copenhagen, pp 97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Panopoulou E, Tambouris E, Tarabanis K (2009) eParticipation initiatives: How is Europe progressing? Eur J ePract 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Panopoulou E, Tambouris E, Tarabanis K (2010) eParticipation initiatives in Europe: learning from practitioners. In: Macintosh A, Tambouris E, Glassey O (eds) LNCS 6229, proceedings of ePart 2010. Springer, Lausanne, pp 54–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Parés M, Pomeroy M, Díaz L (2007) Observing the local participatory democracies. IOPD, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascale R, Sternin J, Sternin M (2010) The power of positive deviance. Harvard Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Peart MN, Ramos Díaz J (2007) Comparative project on local e-democracy initiatives in Europe and North America. e-Democracy Centre, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson P (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 94(2):251–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratchett L (2006) Understanding e-democracy in Europe. Ad-hoc committee on e-democracy (CAHDE), Council of Europe, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto-Martín P (2006a) Putting e-participation research on the service of civil society. In: Rose J (ed) European research workshop: mapping eParticipation, MCIS 2006. DEMO-Net, Venice

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto-Martín P (2006b) Virtual environments for citizen participation: principal bases for design. In: Remenyi D (ed) ECEG 2006. Academic Conferences Limited, Marburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto-Martín P (2010) Las alas de Leo. La participación ciudadana del siglo XX. Asociación Ciudades Kyosei, Panajachel

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt B, Thomas P (2007) Democratic dialogue – a handbook for practitioners. IDEA, OAS & UNDP, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Punie Y, Lusoli W, Misuraca G, Broster D (eds) (2009) The impact of social computing on the EU information society and economy. IPTS, Sevile

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambøll Management (2008) Evaluation of the e-Participation preparatory action. EC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæbø Ø, Rose J, Flak LS (2008) The shape of eParticipation: characterizing an emerging research area. Gov Inf Q 25:400–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford C, Rose J (2007) Characterizing eParticipation. Int J Inf Manag 27(6):406–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer S, Schneider C, Wimmer M, Shaddock J (2008) Studying eParticipation in government innovation programmes: lessons from a survey. In: 21st Bled eConference – eCollaboration, Bled

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependence: opening the black box. Acad Manag Rev 34(4):689–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdegem P, Stragier J, Verleye G (2010) Measuring for knowledge: a data-driven research approach for eGovernment. Electron J e-Gov 8(2):227–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Westholm H, Wimmer M (2007) Interdisciplinary framework to address the socio-technical and political challenges of eParticipation. DEMO-Net, Bremen

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouridis S, Thaens M (2003) E-government: towards a public administration approach. Asian J Publ Admin 25(2):159–183

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Prieto-Martín .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prieto-Martín, P., de Marcos, L., Martínez, J.J. (2012). A Critical Analysis of EU-Funded eParticipation. In: Charalabidis, Y., Koussouris, S. (eds) Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27219-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27219-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27218-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27219-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics