Abstract
This chapter reflects, from a holistic perspective, on the challenges surrounding the development of eParticipation in Europe, with special focus on EU programmes. To this end, first, we assess the field’s practical and theoretical achievements and limitations, and corroborate that the progress of eParticipation in the last decade has not been completely satisfactory in spite of the significant share of resources invested to support it. Second, we attempt to diagnose and shed light on some of the field’s systemic problems and challenges which are responsible for this lack of development. The domain’s maladies are grouped under tree main categories: (1) lack of a proper understanding and articulation with regard to the ‘participation’ field, (2) eParticipation community’s ‘founding biases’ around eGovernment and academy, and (3) inadequacy of traditional innovation support programmes to incentivize innovation in the field. In the context of the ‘Europe 2020 Strategy’, the final section provides several recommendations that should contribute to enhance the effectiveness of future European eParticipation actions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
http://www.demo-net.org/. Accessed 10 Oct 2011.
- 2.
http://islab.uom.gr/eP/. Accessed 10 Oct 2011.
- 3.
http://www.ep-momentum.eu/. Accessed 10 Oct 2011.
- 4.
http://crossroad.epu.ntua.gr/. Accessed 10 Oct 2011.
- 5.
http://pep-net.eu/. Accessed 10 Oct 2011.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
References
Aichholzer G, Westholm H (2009) Evaluating eParticipation projects: practical examples and outline of an evaluation framework. Eur J ePrac 7:1–18
Albrecht S, Kohlrausch N, Kubicek H (2008) eParticipation – electronic participation of citizens and the business community in eGovernment. University of Bremen, Bremen
Brodie E, Cowling E, Nissen N (2009) Understanding participation: a literature review. Pathways Through Participation, London
Bruns A, Swift A (2010) g4c2c: enabling citizen engagement at arms’ length from government. EDem 3(1):57–69
Chadwick A (2009) Web 2.0: new challenges for the study of e-Democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S J Law Policy Inf Soc 5(1):9–41
Charalabidis Y, Gionis G, Ferro E (2010) Towards a systematic exploitation of Web 2.0 and simulation modeling tools in public policy process. In: Macintosh A, Tambouris E (eds) LNCS 6229, proceedings of ePart 2010. Springer, Lausanne, pp 1–12
Chrissafis T, Rohen M (2010) European eParticipation developments: from ad hoc experiences towards mass engagement. J eDemocr 2(2):89–98
CitizenScape (2010a) D2.1.2: monitoring and evaluation report. http://citizenscape.org/consortium-area/wp3.3-project-management-coordination-liaison-with/deliverables. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
CitizenScape (2010b) D3.4: final report. http://citizenscape.org/news/citizenscape-public-final-report. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
CitizenScape (2010c) Lessons learnt from CitizenScape Pilot trials. http://citizenscape.org/news/lessons-learnt-from-citizenscape-pilot-trials. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
CoE (2009) Electronic democracy (e-democracy). Recommendation CM/Rec(2009), adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. Council of Europe, Strasbourg
Coleman S (2006) Democracy in the Internet age (speech). e-Governance Academy, Tallinn
Coleman S, Kaposi I (2009) A study of e-participation projects in third-wave democracies. Int J Electron Govern 2(4):302–327
Cornwall A, Romano J, Shankland A (2008) Brazilian experiences of participation and citizen-ship: a critical look. Discussion Paper. IDS, Brighton
CROSSROAD (2010) Final roadmap on ICT for governance and policy modelling. http://crossroad.epu.ntua.gr/files/2010/02/CROSSROAD_D4.3_Final_Roadmap_Report-v1.00.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
CROSSROAD (2011) Final policy recommendations on ICT for governance and policy modelling. http://crossroad.epu.ntua.gr/files/2010/02/CROSSROAD_D4.4_Policy_Recommendations-v2.00.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
De Cindio F, Peraboni CF (2009) e-Participation at the urban level. In: Macintosh A, Tambouris E (eds) LNCS 5694, proceedings of ePart 2009. Springer, Linz, pp 112–124
eGovMoNet (2010) D3.3: eGovernment monitor network, impact measurement methodology. eGovMoNet Consortium
European Union (2011) Online database of EU research projects. http://cordis.europa.eu/. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
European Commission (2009) Ministerial declaration on eGovernment. Malmö. http://www.egov2009.se/wp-content/uploads/Ministerial-Declaration-on-eGovernment.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
European Commission (2010) Interim evaluation of the seventh framework programme. Report of the expert group. European Commission, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/pdf/archive/other_reports_studies_and_documents/fp7_interim_evaluation_expert_group_report.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
European Commission (2011a) Green paper. From challenges to opportunities: towards a common strategic framework for EU research and innovation funding. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/research/csfri/pdf/com_2011_0048_csf_green_paper_en.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
European Commission (2011b) http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/11/59&type=HTML. Innovation – key issues for the European Council. European Commission, Brussels. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
European eParticipation (2009a) D1.1: major factors shaping the development of eParticipation. European eParticipation Study. http://islab.uom.gr/eP/. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
European eParticipation (2009b) D1.3: main benefits of eParticipation developments in the EU. European eParticipation Study. http://islab.uom.gr/eP/. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
European eParticipation (2009c) D5.1: eParticipation recommendations – focusing on the European level. European eParticipation Study. http://islab.uom.gr/eP/. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
European eParticipation (2009d) D7.5: final report. European eParticipation Study. http://islab.uom.gr/eP/. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
European eParticipation (2009e) Summary report. Study and supply of services on the development of eParticipation in the EU. European Commission, Brussels. http://islab.uom.gr/eP/. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
FEED (2009) D1.1: end-user characteristics and system actors. http://www.feed-project.eu/files/FEED_D1_1_End-user%20Characteristics%20and%20System%20Actors.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
Ferro E, Molinari F (2010) Framing Web 2.0 in the process of public sector innovation: going down the participation ladder. Eur J ePrac 9:20–34
Freschi AC, Medaglia R, Nørbjerg J (2009) eParticipation in the institutional domain: a review of research. DEMO-Net, Bergamo
Gaventa J, Barret G (2010) So what difference does it make? Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. Citizenship, participation and accountability. IDS, Brighton
Handler J, Shadbolt N, Hall W, Berners-Lee T, Weitzner D (2008) Web science: an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the web. Commun ACM 51(7):60–69
Howe C (2009) Building the virtual town hall: civic architecture for cyberspace. Public-i, Hove
Ideal-EU (2009) D6.9: final dissemination report. Ideal-EU Consortium
Johnston P (2010) Transforming government’s policy-making processes. Why encouraging more and easier citizen input into policy-making is not enough. JeDEM 2(2):162–169
Lippa B (2008) eParticipation evaluation and impact. DEMO-Net, Bremen
Macintosh A, Coleman S (2006) Multidisciplinary roadmap and report on eParticipation research. DEMO-Net, Bergamo
Macintosh A, Coleman S, Schneeberger A (2009) eParticipation: the research gaps. In: Macintosh A, Tambouris E (eds) LNCS 5694, proceedings of ePart 2009. Springer, Linz, pp 1–11
Maier E, Reimer U (2010) Process support for increasing participation in eParticipation. J eDemocr 2(1):46–55
Medaglia R (2007) The challenged identity of a field: the state of the art of eParticipation research. Inf Polity 12:169–181
Millard J, Meyerhoff Nielsen M (2010) European status of e-participation and what is needed to optimise future Benefits? Paper presented at the EDem 2010, Krems
Molinari F (2010) On sustainable participation. In: Macintosh A, Tambouris E, Glassey O (eds) LNCS 6229, proceedings of ePart 2010. Springer, Lausanne, pp 126–139
MOMENTUM (2010) D2.7: eParticipation projects consolidated results V.3. http://www.ep-momentum.eu/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=T8o4VgJp7oU%3D&tabid=57&mid=492. Accessed 5 Oct 2011
NCDD (2009) Core principles for public engagement. National Coalition for Dialogue & Deliberation, Boiling Springs
Osimo D (2009) A short history of government 2.0: from cool projects to policy impact. In: Gøtze J, Pedersen CB (eds) State of the eUnion. Government 2.0 and onwards. 21gov.net, Copenhagen, pp 97–107
Panopoulou E, Tambouris E, Tarabanis K (2009) eParticipation initiatives: How is Europe progressing? Eur J ePract 7
Panopoulou E, Tambouris E, Tarabanis K (2010) eParticipation initiatives in Europe: learning from practitioners. In: Macintosh A, Tambouris E, Glassey O (eds) LNCS 6229, proceedings of ePart 2010. Springer, Lausanne, pp 54–65
Parés M, Pomeroy M, Díaz L (2007) Observing the local participatory democracies. IOPD, Barcelona
Pascale R, Sternin J, Sternin M (2010) The power of positive deviance. Harvard Press, Boston, MA
Peart MN, Ramos Díaz J (2007) Comparative project on local e-democracy initiatives in Europe and North America. e-Democracy Centre, Zürich
Pierson P (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 94(2):251–267
Pratchett L (2006) Understanding e-democracy in Europe. Ad-hoc committee on e-democracy (CAHDE), Council of Europe, Strasbourg
Prieto-Martín P (2006a) Putting e-participation research on the service of civil society. In: Rose J (ed) European research workshop: mapping eParticipation, MCIS 2006. DEMO-Net, Venice
Prieto-Martín P (2006b) Virtual environments for citizen participation: principal bases for design. In: Remenyi D (ed) ECEG 2006. Academic Conferences Limited, Marburg
Prieto-Martín P (2010) Las alas de Leo. La participación ciudadana del siglo XX. Asociación Ciudades Kyosei, Panajachel
Pruitt B, Thomas P (2007) Democratic dialogue – a handbook for practitioners. IDEA, OAS & UNDP, Stockholm
Punie Y, Lusoli W, Misuraca G, Broster D (eds) (2009) The impact of social computing on the EU information society and economy. IPTS, Sevile
Rambøll Management (2008) Evaluation of the e-Participation preparatory action. EC
Sæbø Ø, Rose J, Flak LS (2008) The shape of eParticipation: characterizing an emerging research area. Gov Inf Q 25:400–428
Sanford C, Rose J (2007) Characterizing eParticipation. Int J Inf Manag 27(6):406–421
Scherer S, Schneider C, Wimmer M, Shaddock J (2008) Studying eParticipation in government innovation programmes: lessons from a survey. In: 21st Bled eConference – eCollaboration, Bled
Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependence: opening the black box. Acad Manag Rev 34(4):689–709
Verdegem P, Stragier J, Verleye G (2010) Measuring for knowledge: a data-driven research approach for eGovernment. Electron J e-Gov 8(2):227–236
Westholm H, Wimmer M (2007) Interdisciplinary framework to address the socio-technical and political challenges of eParticipation. DEMO-Net, Bremen
Zouridis S, Thaens M (2003) E-government: towards a public administration approach. Asian J Publ Admin 25(2):159–183
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prieto-Martín, P., de Marcos, L., Martínez, J.J. (2012). A Critical Analysis of EU-Funded eParticipation. In: Charalabidis, Y., Koussouris, S. (eds) Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27219-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27219-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27218-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27219-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)