Weak and Strong Disjunction in Possibilistic ASP | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Weak and Strong Disjunction in Possibilistic ASP

  • Conference paper
Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6929))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Possibilistic answer set programming (PASP) unites answer set programming (ASP) and possibilistic logic (PL) by associating certainty values with rules. The resulting framework allows to combine both non-monotonic reasoning and reasoning under uncertainty in a single framework. While PASP has been well-studied for possibilistic definite and possibilistic normal programs, we argue that the current semantics of possibilistic disjunctive programs are not entirely satisfactory. The problem is twofold. First, the treatment of negation-as-failure in existing approaches follows an all-or-nothing scheme that is hard to match with the graded notion of proof underlying PASP. Second, we advocate that the notion of disjunction can be interpreted in several ways. In particular, in addition to the view of ordinary ASP where disjunctions are used to induce a non-deterministic choice, the possibilistic setting naturally leads to a more epistemic view of disjunction. In this paper, we propose a semantics for possibilistic disjunctive programs, discussing both views on disjunction. Extending our earlier work, we interpret such programs as sets of constraints on possibility distributions, whose least specific solutions correspond to answer sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baral, C.: Knowledge, Representation, Reasoning and Declarative Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baral, C., Gelfond, M., Rushton, N.: Probabilistic reasoning with answer sets. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 9(1), 57–144 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauters, K., Schockaert, S., De Cock, M., Vermeir, D.: Possibilistic answer set programming revisited. In: Proc. of UAI 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Confalonieri, R., Nieves, J.C., Vázquez-Salceda, J.: Pstable semantics for logic programs with possibilistic ordered disjunction. In: Proc. of AI*IA 2009, pp. 52–61 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Damásio, C.V., Pereira, L.M.: Monotonic and residuated logic programs. In: Benferhat, S., Besnard, P. (eds.) ECSQARU 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2143, pp. 748–759. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Towards possibilistic logic programming. In: Proc. of ICLP 1991, pp. 581–595 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Possibilistic logic. Handbook of Logic for Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming 3(1), 439–513 (1994)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Can we enforce full compositionality in uncertainty calculi? In: Proc. of AAAI 1994, pp. 149–154 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Schockaert, S.: Rules and meta-rules in the framework of possibility theory and possibilistic logic. Scientia Iranica (to appear, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Computing 9, 365–385 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gelfond, M., Lifzchitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: Proc. of ICLP 1988, pp. 1081–1086 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lifschitz, V., Schwarz, G.: Extended logic programs as autoepistemic theories. In: Proc. of LPNMR 1993, pp. 101–114 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nicolas, P., Garcia, L., Stéphan, I., Lefèvre, C.: Possibilistic uncertainty handling for answer set programming. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 47(1–2), 139–181 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Nieves, J.C., Osorio, M., Cortés, U.: Semantics for possibilistic disjunctive programs. In: Baral, C., Brewka, G., Schlipf, J. (eds.) LPNMR 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4483, pp. 315–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Osorio, M., Pérez, J.A.N., Ramírez, J.R.A., Macías, V.B.: Logics with common weak completions. Journal of Logic and Computation 16(6), 867–890 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Tarski, A.: A lattice-theoretical fixpoint theorem and its applications. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 5(2), 285–309 (1955)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 3–28 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bauters, K., Schockaert, S., De Cock, M., Vermeir, D. (2011). Weak and Strong Disjunction in Possibilistic ASP. In: Benferhat, S., Grant, J. (eds) Scalable Uncertainty Management. SUM 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6929. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23962-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23963-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics