Abstract
This article studies a specific kind of change in an argumentation system: the removal of an argument and its interactions. We illustrate this operation in a legal context and we establish the conditions to obtain some desirable properties when removing an argument.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alchourrón, C., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530 (1985)
Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Automated Reasoning 29(2), 125–169 (2002)
Amgoud, L., Dupin de Saint-Cyr, F.: Extracting the core of a persuasion dialog to evaluate its quality. In: Sossai, C., Chemello, G. (eds.) ECSQARU 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5590, pp. 59–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., Parsons, S.: Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In: Proc. of ICMAS, pp. 31–38 (2000)
Baumann, R., Brewka, G.: Expanding argumentation frameworks: Enforcing and monotonicity results. In: Proc. of COMMA, pp. 75–86. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2010)
Boella, G., Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.: Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: Abstraction principles and the grounded extension. In: Sossai, C., Chemello, G. (eds.) ECSQARU 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5590, pp. 107–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Boella, G., Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.: Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: Attack refinement and the grounded extension. In: Proc. of AAMAS, pp. 1213–1214 (2009)
Brewka, G.: Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus. Journal of Logic and Computation 11(2), 257–282 (2001)
Cayrol, C., Dupin de Saint Cyr, F., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C.: Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 38, 49–84 (2010)
Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321–358 (1995)
Moguillansky, M.O., Rotstein, N.D., Falappa, M.A., García, A.J., Simari, G.R.: Argument theory change through defeater activation. In: Proc. of COMMA 2010, pp. 359–366. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2010)
Rahwan, I., Larson, K., Tohmé, F.: A characterisation of strategy-proofness for grounded argumentation semantics. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2009, pp. 251–256 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bisquert, P., Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F.D., Lagasquie-Schiex, MC. (2011). Change in Argumentation Systems: Exploring the Interest of Removing an Argument. In: Benferhat, S., Grant, J. (eds) Scalable Uncertainty Management. SUM 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6929. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23962-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23963-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)