Abstract
Modular design rules are rooted in a tradition of process design for physical production. In response to an emerging information systems research agenda for design logic in the realm of services and digital goods, and through the lens of dynamic capabilities theory, the research presented here re-examines traditional modular design in the context of a service-centric volatile marketplace. A complex adaptive systems simulation artifact from prior literature is augmented with a novel operationalization of market volatility, and a series of hypotheses are tested that demonstrate a need for revision of modular design rules in a dynamic context. Rules that have historically isolated the modular design decision to characterizations of task interaction are expanded to incorporate a new objective: adaptive parity with the environment. It is the goal of this continuing research stream to make early contributions in the recently proposed agenda for new organizing logic in digital innovation and services.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin, C., Clark, K.: Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Cherbakov, L., Galambos, G., Harishankar, R., Kalyana, S., Rackham, G.: Impact of Service Orientation at the Business Level. IBM Systems Journal 44(4) (2005)
Eisenhardt, K., Martin, J.: Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal 21(10/11), 1105 (2000)
Eisenhardt, K., Sull, D.: Strategy as Simple Rules. Harvard Business Review 79(1), 106 (2001)
Ethiraj, S., Levinthal, D.: Bounded Rationality and the Search for Organizational Architecture: An Evolutionary Perspective on the Design of Organizations and Their Evolvability. Administrative Science Quarterly 49, 404 (2004a)
Ethiraj, S., Levinthal, D.: Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems. Management Science 50(2), 159 (2004b)
Helfat, C., Peteraf, M.: The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability Lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal 24(10), 997 (2003)
Jacklin, S., Schumann, J., Pramod, G., Richard, M., Guenther, K., Soares, F.: Development of Advanced Verification and Validation Procedures and Tools for the Certification of Learning Systems in Aerospace Applications. Paper presented at the Infotech@Aerospace Conference, Arlington, Virginia (2005)
Jurkovich, R.: A Core Typology of Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 19, 380 (1974)
Kauffman, S.: The Orgins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York (1993)
Levinthal, D.: Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes. Management Science 43(7), 934 (1997)
Makadok, R.: Toward a Synthesis of the Resource-Based and Dynamic-Capability Views of Rent Creation. Strategic Management Journal 22(5), 487 (2001)
Miles, R., Snow, C., Pfeffer, J.: Organization-Environment: Concepts and Issues. Industrial Relations 13, 244 (1974)
O’Leary, T., Goul, M., Moffit, K., Radwan, A.: Validating Expert Systems. IEEE Expert 51 (1990)
Pavlou, P., El Sawy, O.: Understanding the ’Black Box’ of Dynamic Capabilities: A Missing Link to the Strategic Role of IT in Turbulent Environments. Under 3rd Round of Review - Management Science (2005)
Phattanasri, P., Loparo, K.: Verification and Validation of Complex Adaptive Systems. Paper Presented at the IJCNN 2005 - Verification, Validation, and Certification of Neuro-Adaptive Controllers in Safety-Related Areas, Montreal, Canada (2005)
Simon, H.: The Architecture of Complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106, 467 (1962)
Simon, H.: Strategy and Organizational Evolution. Strategic Management Journal 14, 131 (1993)
Teece, D., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7), 509 (1997)
Winter, S.: Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 24(10), 991 (2003)
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Lyytinen, K.: The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research 21(4), 724–735 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nichols, J., Goul, M., Dooley, K., Demirkan, H. (2011). Reconsidering Modular Design Rules in a Dynamic Service Context. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds) Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research. DESRIST 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6629. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20632-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20633-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)