Sailing the Semantic Seas by Structural Vessels: Problems and Perspectives for the Identification of Implicit Knowledge in the Legal Domain | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Sailing the Semantic Seas by Structural Vessels: Problems and Perspectives for the Identification of Implicit Knowledge in the Legal Domain

  • Conference paper
AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Complex Systems, the Semantic Web, Ontologies, Argumentation, and Dialogue (AICOL 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6237))

  • 1198 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we propose some preliminary insights on how the relationship of Law and AI affects the identification of implicit knowledge in the legal domain. From a theoretical point of view, the notion of knowledge, as conceived in AI, is problematical for law, because it cannot be solved making recourse to a dominant theory on truth. As it is known, the current state of legal research is fragmented, not only on the issue of identifying truth, but more generally on the issue of evaluating the relationships between formalism and informalism in law. in diverse theories of truth. From an operational point of view, new advances in terms of social network analysis could be fruitful to knowledge discovery in the legal domain, especially for application of legal ontologies in multicultural contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Imielinsky, T., Swami, A.: Mining Associations Rules between Sets of Items in Large Database. In: Buneman, P., Jajodia, S. (eds.) Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data, pp. 207–216. ACM Press, Washington (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Visser, P.R.S.: Open Texture and Ontologies in Legal Information Systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 192–197. IEEE Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamins, R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A.: Law and the Semantic Web, an Introduction. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Borgo, S., Guarino, N., Masolo, C.: Stratified Ontologies: The Case of Physical Objects. In: Proceedings of the ECAI-96 Workshop on Ontological Engineering. John Wiley, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bourcier, D., Mazzega, P.: Toward Measure of Complexity in Legal Systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Stanford Law School, June 4-8, pp. 211–215. ACM Press, Stanford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buchanan, M.: Nexus: Small World and the Groundbreaking Science of Network. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bylander, T., Chandrasekaran, B.: Generic tasks in Knowledge Based Reasoning: The Right Level of Abstraction for Knowledge Acquisition. In: Gaines, B., Boose, J. (eds.) Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems, vol. 1, pp. 65–77. Academic Press, London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chandrasekaran, B., Johnson, R., Benjamins, R.: Ontologies: what are they? why do we need, them? IEEE Intelligent Systems 14, 20–26 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chassin, D.P., Posse, C.: Evaluating North American Electric Grid Reliability using the Barabási–Albert Network Model. Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 355, 667–677 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cotterrell, R.: The Concept of Legal Culture. In: Nelken, D. (ed.) Comparing Legal Cultures, pp. 13–31. Aldershot, Dartmouth (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cox, D.R., Wertmuth, N.: Multivariate Dependencies. Chapman & Hall, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. David, M.: Correspondence and Disquotation. In: An Essay on the Nature of Truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Doan, A., Halevy, A.: Semantic integration research in the database community: A brief survey. AI Magazine, Special Issue on Semantic Integration (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dworkin, R.: Law’s Empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fortuna, B., Grobelnik, M., Mladenic, D.: OntoGen: Semi-automatic Ontology Editor. In: Smith, M.J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) HCII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4558, pp. 309–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Foulkes, P.: Theories of Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 77, 63–72 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Freeman, C.L.: Social Networks and the Structure Experiment. In: Freeman, C.L., White, D.R., Romney, A.K. (eds.) Research Method in Social Network Analysis, pp. 11–40. George Mason University Press, Fairfax (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Friedman, L.: The Place of Legal Culture in the Sociology of Law. In: Freeman, M. (ed.) Law and Sociology: Current Legal Issues, vol. 8, pp. 185–199. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Gangemi, A., Sagri, M.T., Tiscornia, D.: A Constructive Framework for Legal Ontologies. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 97–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilardoni, L., Biasuzzi, C., Ferraro, M., Fonti, R., Slavazza, P.: LKMS – A Legal Knowledge Management System Exploiting Semantic Web Technologies. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gomez-Perez, A., Benjamins, R.: Overview of Knowledge Sharing and Reuse Components: Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI-99, Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods (KRR5). Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology in Information Systems. In: Proceedings of FOIS 1998, pp. 3–15. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hafner, C.D.: Representation of knowledge in a legal information retrieval system. SIGIR, 139–153 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hart, H.L.A.: The Concept of Law. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hoecke, M., van, W.M.: Legal Cultures and Legal Paradigms: Towards a New Model for Comparative Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 47, 495–536 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoekstra, R., Breuker, J., Di Bello, M., Boer, A.: The LKIF Core Ontology of Basic Legal Concepts. In: Casanovas, P., Biasiotti, M.A., Francesconi, E., Sagri, M.T. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques (LOAIT 2007). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 43–63 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jäschke, R., Hotho, A., Schmitz, C., Ganter, B., Stumme, G.: Discovering Shared Conceptualizations in Folksonomies. In: Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 6, pp. 38–53 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kim, H., Yang, S., Song, S., Breslin, J.G., Kim, H.: Tag Mediated Society with SCOT Ontology. In: Proceedings of the Semantic Web Challenge. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lacey, N.J., Lee, M.H.: The Epistemological Foundations of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines 13, 339–365 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Legrand, P.: Against A European Civil Code. Modern Law Review 60, 46–63 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Legrand, P.: Antivonbar. Journal of Comparative Law 1, 13–40 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lehrer, K.: The Coherence Theory of Knowledge. Philosophical Topics 14, 5–25 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Limpens, F., Gandon, F., Buffa, M.: Bridging Ontologies and Folksonomies to Leverage Knowledge Sharing on the Social Web: a Brief Survey. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Social Software Engineering and Applications, SoSEA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Ontology Learning. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16, 72–79 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Margalit, A.: Open texture. In: Margalit, A. (ed.) Meaning and Use, pp. 141–152. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht (1979)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Marmor, A.: Interpretation and Legal Theory. Hart Publishing, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Merryman, J., Clark, D.: Comparative Law: Cases and Materials. Michie Company, Charlotsville (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mika, P.: Ontologies are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 522–536. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Milton, N.: Knowledge Acquisition in Practice. A Step-by-step Guide. In: Decision Engineering. Springer, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Moens, M.F.: Innovative techniques for legal text retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law 9, 29–57 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nigro, H.O., Gonzalez Cisaro, S.E., Xodo, D.H. (eds.): Data Mining with Ontologies: Implementations, Findings and Frameworks. Idea Group Reference, Hershey (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pagallo, U.: Small World Paradigm and Empirical Research in Legal Ontologies: a Topological Approach. In: Ajani, G., Peruginelli, G., Sartor, G., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) The Multilanguage Complexity of European Law. Methodologies in Comparison, pp. 1957–1210. European Press Academic Publishing, Florence (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Papatheodorou, C., Vassilious, A., Simon, B.: Discovery Ontologies for Learning Resources using Word-based Clustering. In: Barker, P., Rebelsky, S. (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2002, pp. 1523–1528. AACE, Denver (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pepijn, R.S., Visser, S., Trevor, J., Bench-Capon, M.: A Comparison of Four Ontologies for the Design of Legal Knowledge Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6, 27–57 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Samuel, G.: Epistemology and Method in Law. Ashgate, Aldershot (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sartor, G.: Legal concepts as Inferential Nodes and Ontological Categories. Artificial Intelligence and Law 17, 217–251 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Schild, U., Saban, J.: Knowledge Representation in Legal Systems. Syracuse Law Review 52, 1321–1330 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Searle, J.: The Construction of Social Reality. Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J.: Knowledge Discovery from Legal Databases. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Valente, A.: A Modelling Approach to Legal Knowledge Engineering. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vision, G.: Modern Anti-Realism and Manufactured Truth. Routledge, London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Walker, R.: The Coherence Theory of Truth. Routledge, London (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wieacker, F.: Foundations of European Legal Culture. American Journal of Comparative Law 38, 1–29 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zimmermann, R.: Savigny’s Legacy: Legal History, Comparative Law, and the Emergence of a European Legal Science. Law Quarterly Review 112, 576–605 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Torino, Italy

    Gianmaria Ajani

  2. University of Eastern Piedmont, Italy

    Piercarlo Rossi

Authors
  1. Gianmaria Ajani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Piercarlo Rossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Law and Technology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain

    Pompeu Casanovas

  2. Torino Law School, University of Torino, via s. Ottavio 20, 10124, Torino, Italy

    Ugo Pagallo  & Gianmaria Ajani  & 

  3. Institute Badia Fiesolana, European University, 50016, San Domenico di Fiesole, Florence, Italy

    Giovanni Sartor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ajani, G., Rossi, P. (2010). Sailing the Semantic Seas by Structural Vessels: Problems and Perspectives for the Identification of Implicit Knowledge in the Legal Domain. In: Casanovas, P., Pagallo, U., Sartor, G., Ajani, G. (eds) AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Complex Systems, the Semantic Web, Ontologies, Argumentation, and Dialogue. AICOL 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6237. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16524-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16524-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16523-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16524-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics