Using Multi-criteria Decision Making to Choose Process Representation Format for a Process Repository | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Using Multi-criteria Decision Making to Choose Process Representation Format for a Process Repository

  • Conference paper
Business Information Systems Workshops (BIS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 57))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Reuse of business process models is the act of designing business processes by using existing process models. Reuse of business process models has been considered as a way to reduce the cost of modeling business processes from scratch. In order to support reuse of process models, a critical mass of process models is required which justifies the effort of maintaining a process model repository. While there are several process modeling languages, no single language is widely accepted. So in order to make process models usable, the stored process models must be presented in a language understandable by users. The purpose of this work is to apply multi-criteria decision making to choose process representation format for a process model repository.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Markovic, I., Pereira, A.C.: Towards a Formal Framework for Reuse in Business Process Modeling. In: ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Benatallah, B., Paik, H.-Y. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2007. LNCS, vol. 4928, pp. 484–495. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Hornung, T., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: A Recommender System for Business Process Models. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Workshop on Information Technology and Systems (WITS’07), Montreal, Canada, pp. 127–132 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rodrigues, J.A., Souza, J.M., Zimbrao, G., Xexeo, G., Neves, E., Pinheiro, W.A.: A P2P Approach for Business Process Modelling and Reuse. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 297–307. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yan, Z., Dijkman, R., Grefen, P.: Business Process Model Repositories - Framework and Survey. Beta Working Papers, vol. 292. Eindhoven University of Technology (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shahzad, K., Andersson, B., Bergholtz, M., Edirisuriya, A., Illayperuma, T., Jayaweera, P., Johannesson, P.: Elicitation of Requirements for a Business process Model Repository. In: Ardagna, C., et al. (eds.) BPM 2008 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 17, pp. 42–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. List, B., Korherr, B.: An Evaluation of Conceptual Business Process Modelling Languages. In: Proceedings of the 21st SAC’06, Dijon, France, pp. 1532–1539 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L., Gronlund, A., Larsson, A.: Public Decisino Support – using a DSS to increase Democratic Transparency. International Journal of Public Information Systems 1(1), 3–25 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shahzad, K., Elias, M., Johannesson, P.: Towards Cross Language Process Model Reuse – A Language Independent Representation of Process Models. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IFIP WG8.1 PoEM’09, Stockholm, Sweden. LNBIP, vol. 39, pp. 176–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cleman, R.T., Reily, T.: Making Hard Decisions with Decision Tools. Duxbury Thomson Learning, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. http://pvu.dsv.su.se/Decide/Index (last accessed March 14, 2010)

  11. http://poem.dsv.su.se (last accessed March 14, 2010)

  12. Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L., Johansson, J., Larsson, A.: The DecideIT Decision tool. In: Bernard, J.-M., Seidenfeld, T., Zaffalon, M. (eds.) Proceedings of ISIPTA’03, pp. 204–217. Carleton Scientific (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Elias, M., Shahzad, K. (2010). Using Multi-criteria Decision Making to Choose Process Representation Format for a Process Repository. In: Abramowicz, W., Tolksdorf, R., Węcel, K. (eds) Business Information Systems Workshops. BIS 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 57. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15402-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15402-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15401-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15402-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics