Abstract
Sometimes it is impossible to attribute responsibility to individuals when something goes wrong, or right, especially when many different agents are involved. Moral norms may dictate that certain events are not to happen, but responsibility can only be attributed to an agent if this agent was able to do the right thing, she knew what she ought to do, and she did not accidentally fail in completing her task. The fact that we cannot attribute responsibility for certain unfortunate events due to the absence of these conditions is called the problem of many hands. This contribution presents a logical analysis of the problem of many hands in the framework of XSTIT with intentions, as developed by Jan Broersen. The problem of many hands is analysed in terms of an inference from the existence of a norm and the fact that all agents are acting responsibly to the conclusion that the norm is obeyed. To make that inference valid, additional assumptions are necessary, to ensure that the fairness conditions are met. As the formal analysis shows, tasks can be distributed so as to minimize the gap in this inference, but it cannot be completely bridged: at some point we have to acknowledge that moral responsibility falls short of guaranteeing moral norm fulfilment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anscombe, G.E.M.: Intention. Basil Blackwell, London (1963)
Bovens, M.: The Quest for Responsibility. Cambridge UP, New York (1998)
Broersen, J.: Deontic epistemic stit-logic distinguishing modes of mens rea. Journal of Applied Logic (2010)
Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42(3), 213–261 (1990)
de Lima, T., Royakkers, L., Dignum, F.: A Logic for Reasoning about Responsibility. Journal of the IGPL (accepted)
Grossi, D., Royakkers, L., Dignum, F.: Organisational Structure and Responsibility. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15, 223–249 (2007)
Jones, A.J.I., Sergot, M.J.: A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power. Journal of the IGPL 4(3), 429–445 (1996)
Kutz, C.: Complicity. Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge UP, New York (2000)
Norman, T.J., Reed, C.: Delegation and Responsibility. In: Castelfranchi, C., Lespérance, Y. (eds.) ATAL 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1986, pp. 367–380. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Santos, F., Jones, A.J.I., Carmo, J.: Responsibility for Action in Organisations: A Formal Model. In: Holmström-Hintikka, G., Tuomela, R. (eds.) Contemporary Action Theory. Synthese Library, vol I, vol. 267, pp. 333–348. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)
Thompson, D.F.: Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands. The American Political Science Review 74(4), 905–916 (1980)
van de Poel, I., Royakkers, L.: Ethics, Engineering and Technology. Blackwell, Malden (forthcoming)
van den Hoven, M.J.: Moral Responsibility, Public Office and Information Technology. In: Snellen, I.T.M., van den Donk, W.B.H.J. (eds.) Public Administration in an Information Age, pp. 97–112. IOS, Amsterdam (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mastop, R. (2010). Characterising Responsibility in Organisational Structures: The Problem of Many Hands. In: Governatori, G., Sartor, G. (eds) Deontic Logic in Computer Science. DEON 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6181. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14183-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14183-6_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14182-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14183-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)