Abstract
Many countries have a representative democracy where their governments consist of a relatively small group of politicians that represent the values and beliefs of the majority of the voters. Unfortunately, many citizens are un- satisfied with their rather limited influence on politics especially regarding governments on national level or even higher like the EU or the UN. On the other side, referenda or direct democracies seem to be a too risky way of letting un- knowledgeable or uninterested individuals decide over complex issues. We mainly have these extreme opposites in our democracies due to the limitations of our manually maintained ballot system. Initiatives like Vivarto propose an alternative, called ’Delegated voting’ where parts of a vote can be delegated to people with more knowledge on a certain topic. This leads to a convenient position in the middle between both mentioned extremes. We want to use the vast amount of expertise of many online citizens in our societies in selecting the right politicians and solutions. In this paper we propose the design of system called Parademo, that enables a fine-grained e-democracy. Next to this we briefly describe how we can achieve more transparency and third-party functionality by allowing listeners to subscribe to specific information-streams within communities that are formalized in a Semantic-Web language.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nordfors, M., et al.: The demoex portal (2006), http://demoex.net/en/
Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P., van Harmelen, F.: From shiq and rdf to owl: the making of a web ontology language. Web Semantics 1, 7–26 (2003)
Jefferson, D., Rubin, A.D., Simons, B., Wagner, D.: Analyzing internet voting security. Commun. ACM 47(10), 59–64 (2004)
Krimmer, R. (ed.): Electronic Voting 2006: 2nd International Workshop, Co-organized by Council of Europe, ESF TED, IFIP WG 8.6 and E-Voting. CC, August 2- 4, 2006 in Castle Hofen, Bregenz, Austria. LNI, vol. 86. GI (2006)
Madise, Ü., Martens, T.: E-voting in estonia 2005. the first practice of country-wide binding internet voting in the world. In: Krimmer [4], pp. 15–26 (2005)
Milgram, S.: The small world problem. Psychology Today 31(2), 60–67 (1967)
Nazir, A., Raza, S., Chuah, C.N.: Unveiling facebook: a measurement study of social network based applications. In: IMC 2008: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pp. 43–56. ACM, New York (2008)
Rodriges-Filho, J., Alexander, C., Batista, L.: E-voting in Brazil - the risks to democracy. In: Electronic Voting 2006. GI Lecture Notes in Informatics, pp. 85–94 (2006)
Rubin, A.D.: Security considerations for remote electronic voting. Commun. ACM 45(12), 39–44 (2002)
Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Regret: reputation in gregarious societies. In: AGENTS 2001: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents, pp. 194–195. ACM, New York (2001)
Saebo, O., Pivrinta, T.: Defining the ”e” in e-democracy: a genre lens on it artifacts. In: 29th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Siebes, R. (2010). Parademo: e-Democracy Based on a Delegated Expert Selection Process in a Small-World Network. In: Sideridis, A.B., Patrikakis, C.Z. (eds) Next Generation Society. Technological and Legal Issues. e-Democracy 2009. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 26. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11631-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11631-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11629-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11631-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)