Measuring the Impact of Different Categories of Software Evolution | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Measuring the Impact of Different Categories of Software Evolution

  • Conference paper
Software Process and Product Measurement (Mensura 2008, MetriKon 2008, IWSM 2008)

Abstract

Software evolution involves different categories of interventions, having variable impact on the code. Knowledge about the expected impact of an intervention is fundamental for project planning and resource allocation. Moreover, deviations from the expected impact may hint for areas of the system having a poor design. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between evolution categories and impacted code by means of a set of metrics computed over time for a subject system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caporusso, L., Buzzi, C., Fele, G., Bertoli, P., Sartori, F.: Transitioning to Electronic Voting and Citizen Participation. In: Krimmer, R. (ed.) Proceedings of Electronic Voting 2006 Conference, pp. 191–200 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: A Metrics Suite for Object Oriented Design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 20(6) (June 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fowler, M.: Refactoring: improving the design of existing code. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gamma, J., Erich, R., Helm, V., Richard, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. ISO/IEC 14764. Software Engineering Software Life Cycle Processes Maintenance

    Google Scholar 

  6. JavaNCSS A Source Measurement Suite for Java, http://www.kclee.de/clemens/java/javancss/

  7. Mercuri, R.: Explanation of voter-verified ballot systems. ACM Software Engineering Notes (SIGSOFT) 27(5), http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/22.17.html

  8. Mercuri, R.: A better ballot box? IEEE Spectrum Online (October 2002) http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/publicfeature/oct02/evot.html

  9. Reenskaug, T.: Thing-Model-View Editor an Example from a planning system, Xerox Parc Technical Note (May 1979), http://heim.ifi.uio.no/trygver/1979/mvc-2/1979-12-MVC.pdf

  10. Tiella, R., Villafiorita, A., Tomasi, S.: FSMC+, a tool for the generation of Java code from statecharts. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Principles and practices of programming in Java (PPPJ 2007), pp. 93–102. ACM, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Longo, F., Tiella, R., Tonella, P., Villafiorita, A. (2008). Measuring the Impact of Different Categories of Software Evolution. In: Dumke, R.R., Braungarten, R., Büren, G., Abran, A., Cuadrado-Gallego, J.J. (eds) Software Process and Product Measurement. Mensura MetriKon IWSM 2008 2008 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5338. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89403-2_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89403-2_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89402-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89403-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics