Evaluation and Requirements Elicitation of a DL Annotation System for Collaborative Information Sharing | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Evaluation and Requirements Elicitation of a DL Annotation System for Collaborative Information Sharing

  • Conference paper
Digital Libraries: Research and Development (DELOS 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4877))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We describe an expert evaluation for user requirement elicitation of an annotation system - The Digital Library Annotation Service, DiLAS, that facilitates collaborative information access and sharing. An analytical evaluation was conducted as a Participatory Group Evaluation, which involved presentation beyond the written papers of the objectives and rationale behind the development of the prototype. The empirical evaluation of DiLAS consisted of two experiments. The first evaluation experiment was a bottom up evaluation of the usability of the interface using a qualitative approach. The second stage of our evaluation moved towards a broader work context with a User and Work Centred Evaluation involving an entire, collaborative task situation, which required knowledge sharing on a common real life work task. This paper describes a first evaluation stage in an iterative evaluation process, and the preliminary result is a set of requirements that will inform the next stage of the DiLAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pejtersen, A.M., Hansen, P., Albrechtsen, H.: A Work Centered Approach to Evaluation of a DL Annotation System for Knowledge Sharing in Collaborative Work. In: ICDL. Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Libraries, December 5-8, 2006, vol. I, pp. 78–90. TERI, New Delhi (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agosti, M., Ferro, N.: Annotations as Context for Searching Documents. In: Crestani, F., Ruthven, I. (eds.) CoLIS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3507, pp. 155–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall, C., Brush, A.J.: Exploring the relationship between personal and public annotations. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, Tucson, AZ, USA, pp. 349–357. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klas, C.-P., Fuhr, N., Schaefer, A.: Evaluating Strategic Support for Information Access in the DAFFODIL System. In: Heery, R., Lyon, L. (eds.) ECDL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3232, pp. 476–487. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shipman, F., Hsieh, H., Moore, M., Zacchi, A.: Supporting personal collections across digital libraries in spatial hypertext. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, Tucson, AZ, USA, pp. 358–367. ACM Press, Tucson (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Golovchinsky, G., Price, M.N., Schilit, B.: From reading to retrieval: freeform ink annotations as queries. In: Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, Berkeley, California, United States, pp. 19 – 25 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cleal, B.R., Andersen, H.H.K., Albrechtsen, H.: Collaboration, communication and categorical complexity: A case study in collaboratory evaluation. J. Digital Inf. Manag. 2(1), 13–20 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frommholz, I., Brocks, H., Thiel, U., Neuhold, E., Iannone, L., Semeraro, G., Berardi, M., Ceci, M.: Document-Centered Collaboration for Scholars in the Humanities - The COLLATE System. In: Koch, T., Sølvberg, I.T. (eds.) ECDL 2003. LNCS, vol. 2769, pp. 434–445. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pejtersen, A.M., Albrechtsen, H., Cleal, B., Hansen, C.B., Hertzum, M.: A Web-based Multimedia Collaboratory. Empirical Work Studies in Film Archives. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen, P., Järvelin, K.: Collaborative Information Searching in an Information-Intensive Work Domain: Preliminary Results. Journal of Digital Information Management 2(1), 26–30 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen, P., Järvelin, K.: Collaborative Information Retrieval in an information-intensive domain. Information Processing & Management 41(5), 1101–1119 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marshall, C., Bly, S.: Sharing encountered information: digital libraries get a social life. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE- joint conference on Digital libraries, Tuscon, AZ, USA, pp. 218–227. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Day, V., Jeffries, R.: Information artisans: Patterns of Result Sharing by Information Searchers. In: COOCS 1993. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Organizational Computing Systems, November 1-4, 1993, pp. 98–107. ACM Press, Milpitas, CA, New York (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hertzum, M.: People as Carriers of Experience and Sources of Commitment: Information Seeking in a Software Design Project. New Review of Information Behaviour Research 1, 135–149 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nielsen, J., Mack, R.: Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis, Wharton: Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. Journal of Man-Machine Studies 36(5), 741–773 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carroll, J.M.: Scenario-based Design. In: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development, Wiley, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Greebaum, J., Kyng, M.: Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spinuzzi, C.: The Methodology of Participatory Design. Technical Communication 52(2), 163–174 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Winograd, T.: Bringing Design to Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A.M., Goodstein, L.P.: Cognitive Systems Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bottoni, P., Civica, R., Levialdi, S., Orso, L., Panizzi, E., Trinchese, R.: MADCOW: a Multimedia Digital Annotation System. In: AVI 2004. Proc. Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp. 55–62. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Costantino Thanos Francesca Borri Leonardo Candela

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hansen, P., Pejtersen, A.M., Albrechtsen, H. (2007). Evaluation and Requirements Elicitation of a DL Annotation System for Collaborative Information Sharing. In: Thanos, C., Borri, F., Candela, L. (eds) Digital Libraries: Research and Development. DELOS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4877. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77088-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77088-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77087-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77088-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics