Abstract
In this paper we describe an approach to classifying objects in a domain where classifications are uncertain using a novel combination of argumentation and data mining. Classification is the topic of a dialogue game between two agents, based on an argument scheme and critical questions designed for use by agents whose knowledge of the domain comes from data mining. Each agent has its own set of examples which it can mine to find arguments based on association rules for and against a classification of a new instance. These arguments are exchanged in order to classify the instance. We describe the dialogue game, and in particular discuss the strategic considerations which agents can use to select their moves. Different strategies give rise to games with different characteristics, some having the flavour of persuasion dialogues and other deliberation dialogues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., Swami, A.N.: Association rules between sets of items in large databases. In: Proc. of ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, Washington, pp. 207–216 (May 1993)
Amgoud, L., Maudet, N.: Strategical considerations for argumentative agents (preliminary report). In: Proc. of 9th Int. Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR), Toulouse, France, April 2002, Special session on Argument, Dialogue, Decision, pp. 409–417 (2002)
Amgoud, L., Parsons, S.: Agent dialogues with conflicting preferences. In: Proc. of 8th Int. Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, Seattle, Washignton, August 2001, pp. 1–15 (2001)
Coenen, F.P., Leng, P., Goulbourne, G.: Tree Structures for Mining Association Rules. Journal of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 8(1), 25–51 (2004)
Hamblin, C.L.: Fallacies. Methuen (1970)
Kakas, A.C., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P.: In: Rahwan, I., Moraïtis, P., Reed, C. (eds.) ArgMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3366. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Mcburney, P., Parsons, S.: Games That Agents Play: A Formal Framework for Dialogues between Autonomous Agents. Jo. of logic, language and information 11(3), 315–334 (2002)
Moore, D.: Dialogue game theory for intelligent tutoring systems. Ph.D thesis, Leeds Metropolitan University (1993)
Newman, D.J., Hettich, S., Blake, C.L., Merz, C.J.: UCI Repository of machine learning databases. University of California, Irvine, Dept. of Information and Computer Sciences (1998), http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html
Oren, N., Norman, T.J., Preece, A.: Loose Lips Sink Ships: a Heuristic for Argumentation. In: Proc. of 3rd Int. Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (Argmas 2006), Hakodate, Japan, May 2006, pp. 121–134 (2006), http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/irahwan/argmas/argmas06/argmas2006proceedings.pdf
Walton, D.N., Krabbe, E.C.W.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press, Albany (1995)
Walton, D.N.: Argument Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wardeh, M., Bench-Capon, T., Coenen, F. (2007). PADUA Protocol: Strategies and Tactics. In: Mellouli, K. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4724. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_42
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75255-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75256-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)