Abstract
This work takes place in the general context of the construction and validation of a domain expertise. It aims at the cooperation of two kinds of knowledge, heterogeneous by their granularity levels and their formalisms: expert statements represented in the conceptual graph model and experimental data represented in the relational model. We propose to automate two stages: firstly, the generation of an ontology (terminological part of the conceptual graph model) guided both by the relational schema and by the data it contains; secondly, the evaluation of the validity of the expert statements within the experimental data, using annotated conceptual graph patterns.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, London, UK (1984)
Bos, C., Botella, B., Vanheeghe, P.: Modeling and Simulating Human Behaviors with Conceptual Graphs. In: Delugach, H.S., Keeler, M.A., Searle, L., Lukose, D., Sowa, J.F. (eds.) ICCS 1997. LNCS, vol. 1257, pp. 275–289. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Genest, D.: Extension du modèle des graphes conceptuels pour la recherche d’informations. PhD thesis, Université Montpellier II (December 2000)
Mugnier, M.-L.: Knowledge Representation and Reasoning based on Graph Homomorphism. In: Ganter, B., Mineau, G.W. (eds.) ICCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1867, pp. 172–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Pernelle, N., Rousset, M.C., Ventos, V.: Automatic construction and refinement of a class hierarchy over multi-valued data. In: Siebes, A., De Raedt, L. (eds.) PKDD 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2168, pp. 386–398. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Tilley, T.A., Cole, R.J., Becker, P., Eklund, P.W.: A survey of formal concept analysis support for software engineering activities. In: Ganter, B., Stumme, G., Wille, R. (eds.) Formal Concept Analysis. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3626, pp. 250–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Sendall, S., Kozaczynski, W.: Model transformation: The heart and soul of model-driven software development. IEEE Software 20(5), 42–45 (2003)
Euzenat, J., Le Bach, T., Barrasa, J., Bouquet, P., De Bo, J., Dieng-Kuntz, R., Ehrig, M., Hauswirth, M., Jarrar, M., Lara, R., Maynard, D., Napoli, A., Stamou, G., Stuckenschmidt, H., Shvaiko, P., Tessaris, S., Van Acker, S., Zaihrayeu, I.: State of the art on ontology alignment. deliverable 2.2.3, Knowledge web NoE (2004)
Kolaitis, P.G., Vardi, M.Y.: Conjunctive-Query Containment and Constraint Satisfaction. In: Proceedings of PODS 1998 (1998)
Haemmerlé, O., Buche, P., Thomopoulos, R.: The MIEL system: uniform interrogation of structured and weakly structured imprecise data. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Thomopoulos, R., Baget, JF., Haemmerlé, O. (2007). Conceptual Graphs as Cooperative Formalism to Build and Validate a Domain Expertise. In: Priss, U., Polovina, S., Hill, R. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Knowledge Architectures for Smart Applications. ICCS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4604. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73681-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73681-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73680-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73681-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)