Why Ontologies Are Not Enough for Knowledge Sharing | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Why Ontologies Are Not Enough for Knowledge Sharing

  • Conference paper
Multiple Approaches to Intelligent Systems (IEA/AIE 1999)

Abstract

Knowledge sharing is difficult. One reason is that it is hard to decide how to describe a domain in a way which suits everyone interested in the knowledge. Tackling this problem has been a central theme of the surge in ontological research over recent years. Unfortunately, getting an agreed ontology is not the end of our problems, since the way we represent knowledge is intimately linked to the inferences we expect to perform with it. We introduce three inference systems and discuss the problems of having knowledge passing through them, which are representative of complex problems we may need to solve for knowledge sharing.

Work sponsored by the Consortium British Council/CAPES (Brazil), Grant no. 070/98, and the Science Foundation of the State of Ceará (FUNCAP), Brazil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agusti, J., Esteva, F., Garcia, P., Godo, L., Lopez de Mantaras, R., Sierra, C.: Local Multi-Valued Logics in Modular Expert Systems. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 6(3), 303–321 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Agusti, J., Esteva, F., Garcia, P., Godo, L., Sierra, C.: Combining Multiple-valued Logics in Modular Expert Systems. In: VII Conf. on Uncertainty in A. I. (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews, J., Dahl, V., Popowich, F.: Characterizing Logic Grammars: a Sub-structural Logic Approach. Journal of Logic Programming 26, 235–283 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonner, A.J., Kifer, M.: Transaction Logic Programming. Technical Report CSRI 270, University of Toronto (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Correa da Silva, F.S.: Automated Reasoning About an Uncertain Domain. Technical report, Edinburgh Univ., Dept. of A. I. (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Correa da Silva, F.S., Carbogim, D.V.: A System for Reasoning with Fuzzy Predicates. Technical Report RT-MAC-9413, IME, Univ. of Sao Paulo (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Correa da Silva, F.S., Robertson, D.S., Hesketh, J.: Automated Reasoning with Uncertainties. In: Masuch, M., Polos, L. (eds.) Logic at Work 1992. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 808. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Correa da Silva, F.S., Vasconcelos, W.W., Robertson, D.S.: Cooperation Between Knowledge-Based Systems. In: Proc. IV World Congress on Expert Systems, Mexico City, Mexico, pp. 819–825 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Y. Girard. Linear Logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 50:1-102, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gray, P.p.i.: KRAFT - Knowledge Reuse and Fusion/Transformation, http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/apreece/Research/KRAFT/KRAFTinfo.html

  11. Guarino, N. (ed.): Formal Ontology in Information Systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, R.C.T.: Fuzzy Logic and the Resolution Principle. Journal of the ACM 19, 109–119 (1972)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Neches, R., Gunning, D.: The Knowledge Sharing Effort, http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/papers/kse-overview.html

  14. Reyes, J.A., Esteva, F., Puyol-Gruart, J.: Defining and Combining Multiple-Valued Logics for Knowl. Based Syst. In: Proc. 1st Catalan A. I. Congr. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Santos, M.V.T., Santos, P.E., Correa da Silva, F.S., Rillo, M.: Actions as PROLOG Programs. In: IEEE Proc. of Joint Symposia on Intell. & Systems (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shapiro, E.Y.: Logic Programming with Uncertainties – aTool for Implementing Rule-based Systems. In: Proc. 8th IJCAI (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Subrahmanian, V.S.p. d.: Hermes - a Heterogeneous Reasoning and Mediator System, http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/hermes/index.html

  18. Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. Knowledge Engineering Review 11(2), 93–136 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, C., Orlowska, M.: Homomorphic Transformation Among Inexact Reasoning Models in Distributed Expert Systems. Technical Report 135, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Queensland (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Corrêa da Silva, F.S., Weber Vasconcelos, W., Agustí, J., Robertson, D., de Melo, A.C.V. (1999). Why Ontologies Are Not Enough for Knowledge Sharing. In: Imam, I., Kodratoff, Y., El-Dessouki, A., Ali, M. (eds) Multiple Approaches to Intelligent Systems. IEA/AIE 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1611. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48765-4_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48765-4_56

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66076-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48765-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics