Towards a Pragmatic Use of Ontologies in Multi-agent Platforms | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Towards a Pragmatic Use of Ontologies in Multi-agent Platforms

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2003)

Abstract

The knowledge representation field is gaining momentum with the advent of the Semantic Web activity within the W3C. This working group, thanks to previous researches, has proposed the Ontology Web Language to enhance the expressivity of web pages and to allow semantic inferences. This paper argues that knowledge representation technologies should be core components of multi-agent platforms.

In the first part of this paper, we introduce our agent model that relies on the notion of skill. Then, we identify several criteria that let us to believe that the Owl language should be used as a content language within Agent Communication Languages and also in the design of multi-agent platforms. In the last part, we discuss the conceptual and technological challenges that platform designers coming from the multi-agent field have to deal with when trying to integrate knowledge representation technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Austin, J.L.: How To Do Things With Words. second edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1975)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bechhofer, S., Horrocks, I., Goble, C., Stevens, R.: OilEd: A reason-able ontology editor for the semantic Web. LNCS, vol. 2174, p. 396 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Decker, S., Melnik, S., van Harmelen, F., Fensel, D., Klein, M.C.A., Broekstra, J., Erdmann, M., Horrocks, I.: The semantic web: The roles of XML and RDF. IEEE Internet Computing 4(5), 63–74 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ankolekar, A., et al.: Daml-s: Web service description for the semantic web. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, p. 348. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Fensel, D., van Harmelen, F., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D., Patel-Schneider, P.: Oil: An ontology infrastructure for the semantic web (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O.: Operational semantics of a role-based agent architecture. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS, vol. 1757. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Finin, T., Fritzson, R., Mc Kay, D., Mc Entire, R.: Kqml as an agent communication language. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 1994), Gaithersburg, Maryland, pp. 456–463. ACM Press, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gelernter, D.: Multiple tuple spaces in linda. In: Odijk, E., Rem, M., Syre, J.-C. (eds.) PARLE 1989. LNCS, vol. 366, pp. 20–27. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Grosso, W., Eriksson, H., Fergerson, R., Gennari, J., Tu, S., Musen, M.: Knowledge modeling at the millennium – the design and evolution of protege (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hall, R.S., Beanome, H.C.: A component model for the osgi framework. In: Workshop on Software Infrastructures for Component-Based Applications on Consumer Devices (September 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hewitt, C.: Viewing control structures as patterns of passing messages. In: Artificial Intelligence: An MIT Perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kendall, E.A., Malkoun, M.T., Jiang, C.H.: A methodology for developing agent based systems. In: Zhang, C., Lukose, D. (eds.) First Australian Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Canberra, Australia (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, D., Chu, W.W.: Comparative analysis of six XML schema languages. SIGMOD Record (ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data) 29(3), 76–87 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schalk, T.I.M., Liebig, T., Kargl, F.: Combining fipa acl with daml+oil - a case study. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems, 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Bologna, Italy (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI-agents: from theory to practice. In: Proceedings of the First Intl. Conference on Multiagent Systems, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Routier, J.C., Mathieu, P., Secq, Y.: Dynamic skill learning: A support to agent evolution. In: Proceedings of the AISB 2001 Symposium on Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 25–32 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Searle, J.: Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, 2nd edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1969)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R., Kinny, D.: The GAIA methodology for agentoriented analysis and design. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mathieu, P., Routier, JC., Secq, Y. (2003). Towards a Pragmatic Use of Ontologies in Multi-agent Platforms. In: Palade, V., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2773. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45224-9_188

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45224-9_188

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40803-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45224-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics