An Expressive Efficient Representation: Bridging a Gap between NLP and KR | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

An Expressive Efficient Representation: Bridging a Gap between NLP and KR

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2773))

Abstract

We do not know how humans reason, whether they reason using natural language (NL) or not and we are not interested in proving or disproving such a proposition. Nonetheless, it seems that a very expressive transparent medium humans communicate with, state their problems in and justify how they solve these problems is NL. Hence, we wished to use NL as a Knowledge Representation(KR) in NL knowledge-based (KB) sytems. However, NL is full of ambiguities. In addition, there are syntactic and semantic processing complexities associated with NL. Hence, we consider a quasi-NL KR with a tractable inference relation. We believe that such a representation bridges the gap between an expressive semantic representation (SR) sought by the Natural Language Processing (NLP) community and an efficient KR sought by the KR community. In addition to being a KR, we use the quasi-NL language as a SR for a subset of English that it defines. Also, it is capable of a general-purpose domain-independent inference component which is, according to semanticists, all what it takes to test a semantic theory in any NLP system. This paper gives only a flavour for this quasi-NL KR and its capabilities (for a detailed study see 14).

Knowledge Representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper, R., Crouch, D., van Eijck, J., Fox, C., van Genabith, J., Jaspars, J., Kamp, H., Milward, D., Pinkal, M., Poesio, M., Pulman, S.: The Fracas Consortium, Deliverable D16. With additional contributions from Briscoe, T., Maier, H., Konrad, K. (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Diller, A.: Z An Introduction to Formal Methods. Wing’s Library Problem. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dowty, D.R., Wall, R.E., Peters, S.: Introduction to Montague Semantics. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Boston (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fyodorov, Y., Winter, Y., Francez, N.: A Natural Logic inference system. Inference in Computational Semantics (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hwang, C.H., Schubert, L.K.: Episodic Logic: A comprehensive, Natural Representation for Language Understanding. Minds and Machines 3(4), 381–419 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iwanska, L.M.: Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Representation. In: Natural Language is a Powerful Knowledge Representation system, pp. 7–64. MIT press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iwanska, L.M.: Natural Language Is A Representational Language. In: Knowledge Representation Systems based on Natural Language, pp. 44–70. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. McAllester, D., Givan, R.: Natural Language Syntax and First-Order Inference. Artificial Intelligence 56, 1–20 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. McAllester, D., Givan, R., Shalaby, S.: Natural Language Based Inference Procedures Applied to Schuber‘s Steamroller. AAAI, Menlo Park (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schubert, L.K., Hwang, C.H.: Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Representation. In: Episodic Logic Meets Little Red Riding Hood-A comprehensive Natural Representation for Language Understanding, pp. 111–174. AAAI Press/MIT (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shapiro, S.C.: Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Representation. In: SNePs: A logicf or Natural Language Understanding and Commonsense Reasoning, pp. 175–196. AAAI Press/MIT (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stickel, M.E.: Schubert‘s Steamroller Problem: Formulations and Solutions. Journal of Automated Reasoning 2, 89–101 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Sukkarieh, J.Z.: Mind Your Language! Controlled Language for Inference Purposes. In: To appear in EAMT/CLAW 2003, Dublin, Ireland (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sukkarieh, J.Z.: Natural Language for Knowledge Representation. University of Cambridge (2001), http://www.clp.ox.ac.uk/people/staff/jana/jana.htm

  15. Sukkarieh, J.Z.: Quasi-NL Knowledge Representation for Structurally-Based Inferences. In: Blackburn, P., Kolhase, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Inference in Computational Semantics, Siena, Italy (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sukkarieh, J.Z., Pulman, S.G.: Computer Processable English and McLogic. In: Bunt, H., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg, The Netherlands (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sukkarieh, J.Z. (2003). An Expressive Efficient Representation: Bridging a Gap between NLP and KR. In: Palade, V., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2773. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45224-9_108

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45224-9_108

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40803-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45224-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics