Abstract
In open agent societies, communication protocols and strategies cannot be assumed to always match perfectly, because they are typically specified by different designers. These potential discrepancies raise a number of interesting issues, most notably the problem of checking that the behaviour of an agent is (or will be) conformant to the rules described by a protocol. In this paper, we argue that the ability to merely conform to a protocol is not sufficient for an agent to be a competent user of that protocol. We approach the intuitive idea of protocol competence by introducing a notion that considers, broadly speaking, an agent’s ability to reach a particular state of the interaction and we provide preliminary results that allow us to automatically check competence in the context of a specific class of logic-based agents. Finally, we illustrate how these results can facilitate the customisation of protocols used by agents that are not fully competent.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to Multiagent Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)
Rosenschein, J., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)
Endriss, U., Maudet, N., Sadri, F., Toni, F.: Protocol Conformance for Logic-based Agents. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2003), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)
Pitt, J., Mamdani, A.: A Protocol-based Semantics for an Agent Communication Language. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1999), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)
Sadri, F., Toni, F., Torroni, P.: Dialogues for Negotiation: Agent Varieties and Dialogue Sequences. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, p. 405. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Singh, M.: A Customizable Coordination Service for Autonomous Agents. In: Rao, A., Singh, M.P., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) ATAL 1997. LNCS, vol. 1365, Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
D’Agostino, M., Gabbay, D., Hähnle, R., Posegga, J. (eds.): Handbook of Tableau Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)
Fitting, M.: First-order Logic and Automated Theorem Proving, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Agents that Reason and Negotiate by Arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8, 261–292 (1998)
Stathis, K.: A Game-based Architecture for Developing Interactive Components in Computational Logic. Journal of Functional and Logic Programming 2000 (2000)
McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Desiderata for Inter-agent Protocols. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, Italy (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Endriss, U., Lu, W., Maudet, N., Stathis, K. (2004). Competent Agents and Customising Protocols. In: Omicini, A., Petta, P., Pitt, J. (eds) Engineering Societies in the Agents World IV. ESAW 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3071. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25946-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25946-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22231-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25946-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive