Mining Supervisor Evaluation and Peer Feedback in Performance Appraisals | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Mining Supervisor Evaluation and Peer Feedback in Performance Appraisals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10762))

  • 1172 Accesses

Abstract

Performance appraisal (PA) is an important HR process to periodically measure and evaluate every employee’s performance vis-a-vis the goals established by the organization. A PA process involves purposeful multi-step multi-modal communication between employees, their supervisors and their peers, such as self-appraisal, supervisor assessment and peer feedback. Analysis of the structured data and text produced in PA is crucial for measuring the quality of appraisals and tracking actual improvements. In this paper, we apply text mining techniques to produce insights from PA text. First, we perform sentence classification to identify strengths, weaknesses and suggestions of improvements found in the supervisor assessments and then use clustering to discover broad categories among them. Next we use multi-class multi-label classification techniques to match supervisor assessments to predefined broad perspectives on performance. Finally, we propose a short-text summarization technique to produce a summary of peer feedback comments for a given employee and compare it with manual summaries. All techniques are illustrated using a real-life dataset of supervisor assessment and peer feedback text produced during the PA of 4528 employees in a large multi-national IT company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://textblob.readthedocs.io/en/dev/.

  2. 2.

    We used 100 dimensional word vectors trained on Wikipedia 2014 and Gigaword 5 corpus, available at: https://nlp.stanford.edu/projects/glove/.

  3. 3.

    We used the default parameter settings for Carrot2 Lingo algorithm as mentioned at: http://download.carrot2.org/head/manual/index.html.

  4. 4.

    https://github.com/miso-belica/sumy.

References

  1. Apte, M., Pawar, S., Patil, S., Baskaran, S., Shrivastava, A., Palshikar, G.K.: Short text matching in performance management. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Management of Data (COMAD 2016), pp. 13–23 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carvalho, V.R., Cohen, W.W.: Improving “email speech acts” analysis via n-gram selection. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 2006 Workshop on Analyzing Conversations in Text and Speech, ACTS’09, pp. 35–41 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, W.W., Carvalho, V.R., Mitchell, T.M.: Learning to classify email into “speech acts”. In: Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2004), pp. 309–316 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cotterill, R.: Question classification for email. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2011) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deshpande, S., Palshilkar, G.K., Athiappan, G.: An unsupervised approach to sentence classification. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data (COMAD 2010), pp. 88–99 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Godbole, S., Sarawagi, S.: Discriminative methods for multi-labeled classification. In: Dai, H., Srikant, R., Zhang, C. (eds.) PAKDD 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3056, pp. 22–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24775-3_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hachey, B., Grover, C.: Sequence modelling for sentence classification in a legal summarisation system. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karypis, George: Cluto-a clustering toolkit. Technical report, DTIC Document (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khoo, A., Marom, Y., Albrecht, D.: Experiments with sentence classification. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Australasian Language Technology Workshop (ALTW2006), pp. 18–25 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Levy, P.E., Williams, J.R.: The social context of performance appraisal: a review and framework for the future. J. Manag. 30(6), 881–905 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lin, C.-Y.: Rouge: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In: Text summarization branches out: Proceedings of the ACL-04 workshop, vol. 8. Barcelona, Spain (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McKnight, L., Srinivasan, P.: Categorization of sentence types in medical abstracts. In: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium, pp. 440–444 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy, K.R., Cleveland, J.: Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational and Goal-Based Perspective. Sage Publishers, Thousand Oaks (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Osinski, S., Stefanowski, J., Weiss, D.: Lingo: search results clustering algorithm based on singular value decomposition. In: Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining, Proceedings of the International IIS: IIPWM’04 Conference held in Zakopane, Poland, pp. 359–368, 17–20 May 2004

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Palshikar, G.K., Deshpande, S., Bhat, S., Quest: discovering insights from survey responses. In: Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Data Mining Conference (AusDM09), pp. 83–92 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pawar, S., Ramrakhiyani, N., Palshikar, G.K., Hingmire, S.: Deciphering review comments: identifying suggestions, appreciations and complaints. In: Biemann, C., Handschuh, S., Freitas, A., Meziane, F., Métais, E. (eds.) NLDB 2015. LNCS, vol. 9103, pp. 204–211. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19581-0_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Qadir, A., Riloff, E.: Classifying sentences as speech acts in message board posts. In: Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2011) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ramrakhiyani, N., Pawar, S., Palshikar, G.K.: A system for classification of propositions of the Indian supreme court judgements. In: Proceedings of the 5th 2013 Forum on Information Retrieval Evaluation (FIRE 2013), pp. 1–4 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ramrakhiyani, N., Pawar, S., Palshikar, G.K., Apte, M.: Aspects from appraisals!! a label propagation with prior induction approach. In: Métais, E., Meziane, F., Saraee, M., Sugumaran, V., Vadera, S. (eds.) NLDB 2016. LNCS, vol. 9612, pp. 301–309. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41754-7_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Schraeder, M., Becton, J., Portis, R.: A critical examination of performance appraisals. J. Quality Particip. 30(1), 20–25 (Spring 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stolcke, A., Ries, K., Coccaro, N., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Jurafsky, D., Taylor, P., Martin, R., Van Ess-Dykema, C., Meteer, M.: Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Comput. Linguist. 26(3), 339–373 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Viswesvaran, C.: Assessment of individual job performance: a review of the past century and a look ahead. In: Anderson, N., Ones, D.S., Sinangil, H.K., Viswesvaran, C. (eds.) Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology. Sage Publishers, Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yamamoto, Y., Takagi, T.: A sentence classification system for multi biomedical literature summarization. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops, pp. 1163–1168 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sachin Pawar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Palshikar, G.K., Pawar, S., Chourasia, S., Ramrakhiyani, N. (2018). Mining Supervisor Evaluation and Peer Feedback in Performance Appraisals. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10762. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77115-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77116-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics