Abstract
Today’s digital robots could become tomorrow’s public servants containing algorithms as integral components of their computer program system. This is how we would slowly slip into the automated society, transforming many facets of life more basically our relationship with governmental branches. The fundamental principle in the constitutional Charter of …e-administration becomes not surprisingly an algorithm. Robot and human mind reveal a difference between perceivability and impassioned perceptivity. Legality and a “Supreme widespread Constitutionality” form inserted data provided to robot in order to calculate upon. For this feedback eliminates unlawful activity of Administration. Robot is charged with a duty of transmitting the request of the administered to the Natural Correspondent of the person who is a superior officer, probably robot’s manipulator. It can also receive a hearing by citizens according to their right for a due process. The robot is in principle not a subject itself, but an interject (=it confronts the citizen but also the State). It also contains both legislation and jurisprudence. The law that is kind of the robot’s heart and guides it is also the product of state will. Correspondingly, jurisprudence, which is the blood with which the heart produces pulsating responses, is the guarantor of the freedoms of the individual. Thus, the robot - civil servant is an autonomous and anarchist guardian of the state organization. At last, all - both citizens and Government - are happy with the robot’s operating as a public servant.
D. Kotsi—Lawyer.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Meisen, T.: Robotics in Public Administration, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering RWTH Aachen University, p. 3. https://www.maschinenbau.rwth-aachen.de/global/show_document.asp?id=aaaaaaaaaaaogsj. Accessed 16 Sept 2017
Meisen, T.: Robotics in Public Administration, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering RWTH Aachen University, p. 6. https://www.maschinenbau.rwth-aachen.de/global/show_document.asp?id=aaaaaaaaaaaogsj. Accessed 16 Sept 2017
Coglianese, C., Lehr, D.: Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era, Faculty Scholarship. 1734, p. 3. http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1734. Accessed 16 Sept 2017
Coglianese, C., Lehr, D.: Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era, Faculty Scholarship. 1734, p. 9. http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1734. Accessed 16 Sept 2017
Mavrias, K., Pantelis, A.: Constitutional Texts, 4th edition. A.N. Sakkoulas, Athens-Komotini: Article 103 of the Constitution of 1975 “Civil servants are executors of the will of the State and serve the People they have faith in the Constitution and devotion to the Fatherland. The qualifications and the manner of their appointment are defined by law”, p. 350 (2007)
Coglianese, C., Lehr, D.: Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era, Faculty Scholarship. 1734, (2017). http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1734. Accessed 16 Sept 2017: “Sierra Club, at 334 (“The safety valves in the use of such sophisticated methodology are the requirement of public exposure of the assumptions and data incorporated into the analysis…”)”
Coglianese, C., Lehr, D.: Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era, Faculty Scholarship. 1734, p. 51. (2017). http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1734. Accessed 16 Sept 2017
Motor Veh. Mfrs. Ass’n v. State Farm Ins (1983). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/463/29/case.html. Accessed 16 Sept 2017
Lytras, S.: Administrative Law (The Organization of Public Administration). A. N. Sakkoulas, Athens-Komotini, p. 67 (2004)
Chevallier, J.: De l’Administration Démocratique à la Démocratie Administrative, Revue Française d’ Administration Publique (La démocratie administrative: Des administrés aux citoyens), No 137–138, pp. 221–222 (2011). «un pouvoir d’ exigibilité»
Skaltsa, M.A.: Protection of the citizen as fundamental principle of the administrative action. A.N. Sakkoulas, p. 76, phrase attributed to Prof. Pr. Pavlopoulos (2007)
Skaltsa, M.A.: Protection of the citizen as fundamental principle of the administrative action. A.N. Sakkoulas, p. 83 (2000)
Coglianese, C., Lehr, D.: Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era, Faculty Scholarship. 1734, pp. 32–33. (2017). http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1734. Accessed 16 Sept 2017
Eldridge, M.V.: U.S. (1976). http://law.jrank.org/pages/23685/Mathews-v-Eldridge-Due-Process-Flexible.html. Accessed 16 Sept 2017
Kelly, G.V.: U.S. (1970). https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/397/254. Accessed 16 Sept 2017
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kotsi, D. (2017). The Penetration of Robotics into the Administrative Function of the State - Pre-economy of Citizenry’s Benefit. In: Katsikas, S., Zorkadis, V. (eds) E-Democracy – Privacy-Preserving, Secure, Intelligent E-Government Services. e-Democracy 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 792. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71117-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71117-1_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71116-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71117-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)