Agile-Similar Approach Based on Project Crashing to Manage Research Projects | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Agile-Similar Approach Based on Project Crashing to Manage Research Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 291))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1267 Accesses

Abstract

Research projects are an integral part of each university’s activity. Recently many theorists and practitioners have started to consider how such projects should be managed (e.g. [13]). They analyse if it is better to use traditional project management (TPM) or agile project management (APM). In this paper we propose agile-similar approach based on project crashing and stakeholder analysis to manage research project. First we present a theoretical introduction. Then we present a model for the proposed approach and its Linear Programing (LP) implementation. Finally we present an example of using the proposed model and we formulate conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbasi, G.Y., Mukkatash, A.M.: Crashing PERT networks using mathematical programming. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 9, 181–188 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Taani, R.H., Razali, R.: Prioritizing requirements in agile development: a conceptual framework. Procedia Technol. 11, 733–739 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Tmeemy, S.H., Abdul-Rahman, H., Harun, Z.: Future criteria of success of building projects in Malaysia. Int. J. Proj. 29, 337–348 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alba, E.: Software project management with GAs. Inf. Sci. 177(11), 2380–2401 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blumer, Y.B., Stauffacher, M., Lang, D.J., Hayashi, K., Uchida, S.: Non-technical success factors for bioenergy projects-Learning from a multiple case study in Japan. Energy Policy 60, 386–395 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brucker, M.N.P.: Resource-constrained project scheduling: notation, classification, models, and methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 112(1), 3–41 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dohi, S.O.T., Nishio, Y.: Optimal software release scheduling based on artificial neural networks. Ann. Softw. Eng. 8, 167 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elkadi, H.: Success and failure factors for e-government projects: a case from Egypt. Egypt. Inf. J. 14(2), 165–173 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Freeman, R.E.: Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach: Pitman Series in Business and Public Policy. Harpercollins, College Div, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kosztyn, Z.T.: Exact algorithm for matrix-based project planning problems. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(9), 4460–4473 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuchta, D., et al.: Success and failure factors of R&D projects at universities. In: R&D Management Conference “From Science to Society: Innovation and Value Creation”, Cambridge, UK (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuchta, D., Ptaszyńska, E.: Using risk register in research projects. In: EDULEARN16 Proceedings, Barcelona, Spain (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuchta, D., Skowron, D.: Classification of R&D projects and selection of R&D project management concept. R&D Management 46(5), 831–841 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lock, D.: Project Management. Gower Publishing Ltd., Farnham (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luglio, F., Bertazzoni, N.: Research management in higher education institutions: a process management experience in Italian Universities. In: Connecting Science with Society - The Role of Research Information in a Knowledge-Based Society - 10th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems, CRIS 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Powers, L.C., Kerr, G.: Project Management and Success in Academic Research. Realworld Syst. (2009). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1408032

  17. Wysocki, R.K.: Effective Project Management: Traditional. Agile Extreme, Wiley (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zou, W., Kumaraswamy, M., Chung, J., Wong, J.: Identifying the critical success factors for relationship management in PPP projects. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 32(2), 265–274 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewa Ptaszyńska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuchta, D., L`Ebraly, P., Ptaszyńska, E. (2017). Agile-Similar Approach Based on Project Crashing to Manage Research Projects. In: Hammoudi, S., Maciaszek, L., Missikoff, M., Camp, O., Cordeiro, J. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 291. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62386-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62386-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62385-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62386-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics