Abstract
Qualitative analysis is essential for obtaining credible and useful HRA results, yet most HRA method descriptions fail to adequately describe how to perform qualitative analysis. Research by the Halden Reactor Project identified task analysis as one of the key qualitative techniques for HRA, and also one of the most challenging for less experienced analysts. This paper makes an argument for why task analysis should be considered a cornerstone technique for qualitative HRA, and also describes current Halden research activities to investigate the role of task analysis in HRA, and to develop support tools for analysts to address these challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Forester, J., Dang, V.N., Bye, A., Lois, E., Massaiu, S., Broberg, H., Braarud, P.Ø., Boring, R., Männistö, I., Liao, H., Julius, J., Parry, G., Nelson, P.: The international HRA empirical study final report: lessons learned from comparing HRA methods predictions to HAMMLAB simulator data. HPR-373/NUREG-2127, OECD Halden Reactor Project (2013)
Liao, H., Forester, J., Dang, V.N., Bye, A., Lois, E., Chang, J.: Lessons learned from the US HRA empirical study. In: Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2012, Hawaii, 22–27 June 2014
Taylor, C.: Improving scenario analysis for HRA. In: Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2012 Hawaii, 22–27 June 2014
Boring, R.: How many performance shaping factors are necessary for human reliability analysis? In: Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2010, Seattle, Washington, 7–11 June 2010
Oxstrand, J., Kelly, D.L., Shen, S., Mosleh, A., Groth, K.M.: A model-based approach to HRA: qualitative analysis methodology. In: The 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management Conference and ESREL 2012, Helsinki, Finland, 25–29 June 2012
Le Bot, P.: Human reliability data, human error and accident models – illustration through the three mile island accident analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 83, 153–157 (2004)
NUREG-1921: EPRI/NRC-RES Fire Human Reliability Analysis Guidelines, Final Report. EPRI Report Number 1023001, Electric Power Research Institute, California, July 2012
Parry, G.W., Forester, J.A., Dang, V.N., Hendrikson, S.M.L., Presley, M., Lois, E., Xing, J.: IDHEAS – a new approach for human reliability analysis. In: International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, PSA 2013, Columbia, South Carolina, 22–26 September 2013
Bye, A., Lauman, K., Taylor, C., Rasmussen, M., Øie, S., van de Merwe, K., Øien, K., Boring, R., Paltrinieri, N., Wæro, I., Massaiu, S., Gould, K.: Petro-HRA, a new method for human reliability analysis in the petroleum industry. In: Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2013, Seoul, Korea, 2–7 October 2016
Taylor, C.: How HRA can drive plant improvement. In: 25th European Safety and Reliability Association Conference, ESREL 2015, Zurich, Switzerland, 7–10 September 2015
Taylor, C.: The importance of operator input to human reliability analysis. In: International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment, PSA 2015, Sun Valley, Idaho, 26–30 April 2015
Kirwan, B.: A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment. Taylor & Francis, London (1994)
Kirwan, B., Ainsworth, L.K.: A Guide to Task Analysis. Taylor & Francis, London (1992)
Boring, R.L.: A task library for petroleum applications in human reliability analysis. In: PSAM 13 Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, Seoul, Korea, 2–7 October 2016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Taylor, C. (2018). Task Analysis as a Cornerstone Technique for Human Reliability Analysis. In: Boring, R. (eds) Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 589. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60645-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60645-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60644-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60645-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)