A Semantic-Driven Model for Ranking Digital Learning Objects Based on Diversity in the User Comments | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

A Semantic-Driven Model for Ranking Digital Learning Objects Based on Diversity in the User Comments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Adaptive and Adaptable Learning (EC-TEL 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9891))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 6535 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a computational model for measuring diversity in terms of variety, balance and disparity. This model is informed by the Stirling’s framework for understanding diversity from social science and underpinned by semantic techniques from computer science. A case study in learning is used to illustrate the application of the model. It is driven by the desire to broaden learners’ perspectives in an increasingly diverse and inclusive society. For example, interpreting body language in a job interview may be influenced by the different background of observers. With the explosion of digital objects on social platforms, selecting the appropriate ones for learning can be challenging and time consuming. The case study uses over 2000 annotated comments from 51 YouTube videos on job interviews. Diversity indicators are produced based on the comments for each video, which in turn facilitate the ranking of the videos according to the degree of diversity in the comments for the selected domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 10295
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 12869
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.statisticbrain.com/youtube-statistics/.

  2. 2.

    A medoid is the most centrally located item in a cluster that has minimal average distances to all the other items in the cluster [22].

  3. 3.

    http://imash.leeds.ac.uk/ontology/amon/BodyLanguage.owl.

  4. 4.

    A graph in ViewS shows the entities (classes and instances) of a domain category (super class). The colored (darker) shapes are the entities from annotating the comments on the video and the uncolored ones are the entities not present in the user comments.

References

  1. Yakin, I., Gencel, I.E.: The utilization of social media tools for informal learning activities: a survey study. Mevlana Int. J. Educ. 3(4), 108–117 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Surowiecki, J.: The Wisdom of Crowds. Random House (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Serbanoiu, A., Rebedea, T.: Relevance-based ranking of video comments on YouTube. In: Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science, CSCS 2013, pp. 225–231 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Siersdorfer, S., Chelaru, S., Nejdl, W., San Pedro, J.: How useful are your comments? - analyzing and predicting YouTube comments and comment ratings. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, vol. 15, pp. 891–900 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chelaru, S., Orellana-Rodriguez, C., Altingovde, I.S.: How useful is social feedback for learning to rank YouTube videos? World Wide Web 17(5), 997–1025 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Filippova, K., Hall, K. B.: Improved video categorization from text metadata and user comments. In: Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information – SIGIR 2011, p. 835 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ammari, A., Lau, L., Dimitrova, V.: Deriving group profiles from social media to facilitate the design of simulated environments for learning. In: Proceedings 2nd International Conference Learning Analytics Knowledge – LAK 2012, p. 198 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Galli, M., Gurini, D. F., Gasparetti, F., Micarelli, A., Sansonetti, G.: Analysis of user-generated content for improving YouTube video recommendation. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1441 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Despotakis, D., Dimitrova, V., Lau, L., Thakker, D.: Semantic aggregation and zooming of user viewpoints in social media content. In: Carberry, S., Weibelzahl, S., Micarelli, A., Semeraro, G. (eds.) UMAP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7899, pp. 51–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Denaux, R., Dimitrova, V., Lau, L., Brna, P., Thakker, D., Steiner, C.: Employing linked data and dialogue for modelling cultural awareness of a user. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2014, pp. 241–246 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gao, Qi, Abel, F., Houben, G.-J., Yu, Y.: A comparative study of users’ microblogging behavior on Sina Weibo and Twitter. In: Masthoff, J., Mobasher, B., Desmarais, M.C., Nkambou, R. (eds.) UMAP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7379, pp. 88–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Bozzon, A., Efstathiades, H., Houben, G.-J., Sips, R.-J.: A study of the online profile of enterprise users in professional social networks. In: WWW 2014 Companion Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 487–492 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stirling, A.: On the economics and analysis of diversity, 28 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS), Measuring The Diversity Of Cultural Expressions: Applying the Stitling Model of Diversity in Culture,vol. 6 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Farchy, J., Ranaivoson, H.: Do public television channels provide more diversity than private ones. J. Cult. Manag. Policy 1, 50–63 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Benhamou, F., Peltier, S.: Application of the stirling model to assess diversity using UIS cinema data. UNESCO Inst. Stat., pp. 1–73 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Benhamou, F., Peltier, S.: How should cultural diversity be measured? an application using the French publishing industry. J. Cult. Econ. 31, 85–107 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rafols, I., Leydesdorff, L., O’Hare, A., Nightingale, P., Stirling, A.: How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: a comparison between Innovation Studies and business & management. Res. Policy 41(7), 1262–1282 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stirling, A.: A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. J. R. Soc. Interface 4(February), 707–719 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Despotakis, D.: Modelling viewpoints in user generated content (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Entisar Abolkasim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abolkasim, E., Lau, L., Dimitrova, V. (2016). A Semantic-Driven Model for Ranking Digital Learning Objects Based on Diversity in the User Comments. In: Verbert, K., Sharples, M., Klobučar, T. (eds) Adaptive and Adaptable Learning. EC-TEL 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9891. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45152-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45153-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics