Abstract
In a text, two concepts can hold either direct or higher order relationship where function of some concepts is considered as another concept. Essentially, we require a mechanism to capture complex associations between concepts. Keeping this in view, we propose a knowledge representation scheme which is flexible enough to capture any order of associations between concepts in factual as well as non-factual sentences. We utilize a five-tuple representation scheme to capture associations between concepts and based on our evaluation strategy we found that by this we are able to represent 90.7 % of the concept associations correctly. This is superior to existing pattern based methods. A use case in the domain of content retrieval has also been evaluated which has shown to retrieve more accurate content using our knowledge representation scheme thereby proving the effectiveness of our approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johansson, R., Nugues, P.M.: Dependency-based syntactic-semantic analysis with PropBank and NomBank. In: Proceedings of CoNNL, pp. 183–187 (2008)
Meyers, A., Reeves, R., Macleod, C., Szekely, R., Zielinska, V., Young, B., Grishman, R.: The nombank project: an interim report. In: Meyers, A. (ed.) HLT-NAACL 2004 Workshop: Frontiers in Corpus Annotation, pp. 24–31. Association for Computational Linguistics, Boston, Massachusetts (2004)
Palmer, M., Gildea, D., Kingsbury, P.: The proposition bank: an annotated corpus of semantic roles. Comput. Linguist. 31, 71–106 (2005)
Colton, S.: Knowledge representation (2007). http://tinyurl.com/gozhw5t. Accessed 21 Feb 2016
Ali, A., Khan, M.A.: Selecting predicate logic for knowledge representation by comparative study of knowledge representation schemes. In: International Conference on Emerging Technologies, ICET 2009, pp. 23–28 (2009)
Clark, P.: Knowledge representation in machine learning. Mach. Hum. Learn. 35–49 (1989)
Brachman, R.J., Levesque, H.J., Reiter, R.: Knowledge Representation. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
Mylopoulos, J.: An overview of knowledge representation. SIGART Bull. 5–12 (1980)
Uschold, M., King, M.: Towards a methodology for building ontologies. Citeseer (1995)
Gmez-Prez, A., Fernndez-Lpez, M., de Vincente, A.: Towards a method to conceptualize domain ontologies. In: Proceedings of ECAI-1996 Workshop on Ontological Engineering (1996)
Uschold, M.: Converting an informal ontology into ontolingua: some experiences. Technical report, University of Edinburgh Artificial Intelligence Applications Institute AIAI TR (1996)
Uschold, M.: Building ontologies: towards a unified methodology. Technical report, University of Edinburgh Artificial Intelligence Applications Institute AIAI TR (1996)
Fernndez-Lpez, M., Gmez-Prez, A., Juristo, N.: Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Ontological Engineering of AAAI (1997)
Pease, A., Niles, I., Li, J.: The suggested upper merged ontology: a large ontology for the semantic web and its applications. In: Working Notes of the AAAI-2002 Workshop on Ontologies and the Semantic Web, vol. 28 (2002)
Olney, A.M., Cade, W.L., Williams, C.: Generating concept map exercises from textbooks. In: Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, IUNLPBEA 2011, pp. 111–119. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2011)
Hearst, M.A.: Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 1992, vol. 2, pp. 539–545. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (1992)
Fader, A., Soderland, S., Etzioni, O.: Identifying relations for open information extraction. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2011, pp. 1535–1545. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2011)
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The weka data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11, 10–18 (2009)
Speer, R., Havasi, C.: Representing general relational knowledge in conceptnet 5. In: Chair, N.C.C., Choukri, K., Declerck, T., Doan, M.U., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Moreno, A., Odijk, J., Piperidis, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Istanbul (2012)
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Samsung R & D Institute India - Bangalore. We thank our colleagues Mr. Tripun Goel, Mr. Krishnamraju Murali Venkata Mutyala, Mr. Chandragouda Patil, Mr. Ramachandran Narasimhamurthy, Mr. Srinidhi Nirgunda Seshadri, Dr. Shankar M. Venkatesan for providing insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research. We thank them for comments to improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chatterji, S., Varshney, N., Chanda, P.K., Mittal, V., Jagwani, B.B. (2016). Extracting and Representing Higher Order Predicate Relations between Concepts. In: Métais, E., Meziane, F., Saraee, M., Sugumaran, V., Vadera, S. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. NLDB 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9612. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41754-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41754-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41753-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41754-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)