Abstract
In the context of development and evolution of heterogeneous industrial systems, the quality of interoperability among manufacturing software units is a major concern. Qualitative characteristics of the interoperability such as reliability, functionality, performance, and security are necessary for the assurance of high quality of the developed manufacturing applications. The implemented interoperability among various software units of manufacturing applications often have various quality criteria. Therefore, an adequate qualitative modeling is required to satisfy the qualitative evaluation of the interoperability. This paper presents the use of quality model developed in respect of quality standard ISO 25000 series as a means to permit the comprehensive evaluation of interoperability of the applications developed regarding the ISO 16100 standard series.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kosanke, K. (2007). ISO standards for interoperability: A comparison. In D. Konstantas, J.-P. Bourrières, M. Léonard & N. Boudjlida (Eds.), Interoperability of enterprise software and applications (pp. 55–64). London: Springer.
Kasunic, M., & Anderson, W. (2004). Assuring systems interoperability: Challenges and opportunities. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.
Folmer, E., & Verhoosel, J. (2011). State of the art on semantic IS standardization, interoperability & quality. UT, CTIT, TNO en NOiV. ISBN 9789090260303.
Matsuda, M., & Wang, Q. (2010). Software interoperability tools: Standardized capability-profiling methodology ISO16100. In Enterprise architecture, integration and interoperability (pp. 140–151). Heidelberg: Springer.
ISO/IEC 25012 (2008). Software engineering-software product quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)—Data quality model.
ISO/IEC 1600-N(1..6). (2011). Industrial automation systems and integration—manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability.
Ahmad, A., Basson, H., Deruelle, L., & Bouneffa, M. (2010, October 3–5). Towards an integrated quality-oriented modeling approach for software evolution control, In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering (ICSTE), (Vol. 2, pp. V2–320-V2-324). San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Harris, S., & Seaborne, A. (2013). The SPARQL 1.1 query language, W3C recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query
Cyganiak, R., Wood, D., & Lanthaler, M. (2014). RDF 1.1 concepts and abstract syntax, W3C recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/
McGuinness, D. L., & Van Harmelen, F. (2004). OWL web ontology language overview, W3C recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Basson, H., Bouneffa, M., Matsuda, M., Ahmad, A., Chung, D., Arai, E. (2016). Qualitative Evaluation of Manufacturing Software Units Interoperability Using ISO 25000 Quality Model. In: Mertins, K., Jardim-Gonçalves, R., Popplewell, K., Mendonça, J. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability VII. Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30957-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30957-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30956-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30957-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)