International Gender Differences and Gaps in Online Social Networks | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

International Gender Differences and Gaps in Online Social Networks

  • Chapter
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8851))

Included in the following conference series:

  • International Conference on Social Informatics

Abstract

Article 1 of the United Nations Charter claims “human rights” and “fundamental freedoms” “without distinction as to [...] sex”. Yet in 1995 the Human Development Report came to the sobering conclusion that “in no society do women enjoy the same opportunities as men”. Today, gender disparities remain a global issue and addressing them is a top priority for organizations such as the United Nations Population Fund. To track progress in this matter and to observe the effect of new policies, the World Economic Forum annually publishes its Global Gender Gap Report. This report is based on a number of offline variables such as the ratio of female-to-male earned income or the percentage of women in executive office over the last 50 years.

In this paper, we use large amounts of network data from Google+ to study gender differences in 73 countries and to link online indicators of inequality to established offline indicators. We observe consistent global gender differences such as women having a higher fraction of reciprocated social links. Concerning the link to offline variables, we find that online inequality is strongly correlated to offline inequality, but that the directionality can be counter-intuitive. In particular, we observe women to have a higher online status, as defined by a variety of measures, compared to men in countries such as Pakistan or Egypt, which have one of the highest measured gender inequalities. Also surprisingly we find that countries with a larger fraction of within-gender social links, rather than across-gender, are countries with less gender inequality offline, going against an expectation of online gender segregation. On the other hand, looking at “differential assortativity”, we find that in countries with more offline gender inequality women have a stronger tendency for withing-gender linkage than men.

We believe our findings contribute to ongoing research on using online data for development and prove the feasibility of developing an automated system to keep track of changing gender inequality around the globe. Having access to the social network information also opens up possibilities of studying the connection between online gender segregration and quantified offline gender inequality.

This work was done while the first author was at Qatar Computing Research Institute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antenucci, D., Cafarella, M., Levenstein, M., Ré, C., Shapiro, M.D.: Using social media to measure labor market flows. Tech. Rep. 20010, National Bureau of Economic Research (March 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anzia, S.F., Berry, C.R.: The jackie (and jill) robinson effect: Why do congresswomen outperform congressmen? American Journal of Political Science 55, 478–493 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aramaki, E., Maskawa, S., Morita, M.: Twitter catches the flu: Detecting influenza epidemics using twitter. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2011, pp. 1568–1576. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bimber: Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly 81(3) (Sep 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bollen, J., Mao, H., Pepe, A.: Modeling public mood and emotion: Twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena. In: ICWSM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bollen, J., Mao, H., Zeng, X.J.: Twitter mood predicts the stock market. J. Comput. Science 2(1), 1–8 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bond, B.J.: He posted, she posted: Gender differences in self-disclosure on social network sites. Rocky Mountain Communication Review 6(2), 29–37 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Women’s Media Center: The status ofwomen in the u.s. media 2014 (2014), http://www.womensmediacenter.com/page/-/statusreport/WMC-2014-status-women-with-research.pdf

  9. Collier, B., Bear, J.: Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in wikipedia contributions. In: CSCW, pp. 383–392 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Costa, P.T., Terracciano, A., McCrae, R.R.: Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(2), 322–331 (2001), http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11519935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Culotta, A.: Lightweight methods to estimate influenza rates and alcohol sales volume from twitter messages. Language Resources and Evaluation 47(1), 217–238 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cunha, E., Magno, G., Gonçalves, M.A., Cambraia, C., Almeida, V.: How you post is who you are: Characterizing google+ status updates across social groups. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, HT 2014, pp. 212–217. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feingold, A.: Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin 116(3), 429–456 (1994), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7809307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia, D., Weber, I., Garimella, V.R.K.: Gender asymmetries in reality and fiction: The bechdel test of social media. In: ICWSM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ginsberg, J., Mohebbi, M., Patel, R., Brammer, L., Smolinski, M., Brilliant, L.: Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature 457, 1012–1014 (2009), http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v457/n7232/full/nature07634.html doi:10.1038/nature07634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hausmann, R., Tyson, L.D., Zahidi, S. (eds.): The global gender gap report 2013 (2013), http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GenderGap_Report_2013.pdf

  17. Hawelka, B., Sitko, I., Beinat, E., Sobolevsky, S., Kazakopoulos, P., Ratti, C.: Geo-located twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 41, 260–271 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heil, B., Piskorski, M.: New twitter research: Men follow men and nobody tweets (June 2009), http://blogs.hbr.org/2009/06/new-twitter-research-men-follo/

  19. Hyde, J.S.: The Gender Similarities Hypothesis. American Psychologist 60(6), 581–592 (2005), http://bama.ua.edu/~sprentic/672%20Hyde%202005.pdf

  20. Iosub, D., Laniado, D., Castillo, C., Fuster Morell, M., Kaltenbrunner, A.: Emotions under discussion: Gender, status and communication in online collaboration. PLoS ONE 9(8), e104880 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Joinson, A.N.: Looking at, Looking Up or Keeping Up with People?: Motives and Use of Facebook. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2008, pp. 1027–1036. ACM (2008), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357213

  22. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.B.: What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In: WWW, pp. 591–600 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lampos, V., Cristianini, N.: Nowcasting events from the social web with statistical learning. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 3(4), 1–72 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lazer, D., Kennedy, R., King, G., Vespignani, A.: The parable of google flu: Traps in big data analysis. Science 343, 1203–1205 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Magno, G., Comarela, G., Saez-Trumper, D., Cha, M., Almeida, V.: New kid on the block: exploring the google+ social graph. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, IMC 2012, pp. 159–170. ACM, New York (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Miritello, G., Lara, R., Cebrian, M., Moro, E.: Limited communication capacity unveils strategies for human interaction. Sci. Rep. 3 (June 2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep01950

  27. O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B.R., Smith, N.A.: From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In: ICWSM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ottoni, R., Pesce, J.P., Las Casas, D., Franciscani Jr, G., Meira Jr, W., Kumaraguru, P., Almeida, V.: Ladies first: Analyzing gender roles and behaviors in pinterest. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R.: The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R), pp. 179–199. SAGE Publications Ltd (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pratto, F., Stallworth, L.M., Sidanius, J.: The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. The British Journal of Social Psychology 36(1), 49–68 (1997), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9114484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Preis, T., Moat, H.S., Stanley, H.E., Bishop, S.R.: Quantifying the advantage of looking forward. Nature Scientific Reports 2, 350 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Quercia, D., Casas, D.B.L., Pesce, J.P., Stillwell, D., Kosinski, M., Almeida, V., Crowcroft, J.: Facebook and privacy: The balancing act of personality, gender, and relationship currency. In: ICWSM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Quercia, D., Sáez-Trumper, D.: Mining urban deprivation from foursquare: Implicit crowdsourcing of city land use. IEEE Pervasive Computing 13(2), 30–36 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmitt, D.P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., Allik, J.: Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94(1), 168–182 (2008), http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&uid=2007-19165-013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Szell, M., Thurner, S.: How women organize social networks different from men. Scientific Reports 3 (July 2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep01214

  36. Thelwall, M.: Social networks, gender, and friending: An analysis of myspace member profiles. JASIST 59(8), 1321–1330 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zagheni, E., Garimella, V.R.K., Weber, I., State, B.: Inferring international and internal migration patterns from twitter data. In: WWW (Companion Volume), pp. 439–444 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, X., Gloor, H.F.P.A.: Predicting asset value through twitter buzz. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing 113, 23–34 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil

    Gabriel Magno

  2. Qatar Computing Research Institute, Doha, Qatar

    Ingmar Weber

Authors
  1. Gabriel Magno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ingmar Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Yahoo! Research, Barcelona, Spain

    Luca Maria Aiello

  2. Stanford Graduate School of Education, 485 Lasuen Mall, 94305-3096, Stanford, CA, USA

    Daniel McFarland

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Magno, G., Weber, I. (2014). International Gender Differences and Gaps in Online Social Networks. In: Aiello, L.M., McFarland, D. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8851. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13733-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13734-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics