Abstract
Biomechanical input data of in silico models are subject to uncertainties due to subject variability, experimental protocol and computing technique. Traditional perturbation analysis showed important drawbacks such as unobvious definition of the true range of value for the sensitivity analysis. In this present study, we used a novel framework to model the uncertainties of thigh mass property as well as to quantify their impact on the thigh muscle force estimation. A simplified patient specific musculoskeletal model (3 segments, 2 joints and 8 hip flexor muscles) of a post-polio residual paralysis subject was developed. Knowledge-based fusion pbox was used to model the uncertainties of the thigh mass property. Then, a Monte Carlo simulation was performed to quantify their impact on the thigh muscle force estimation through forward dynamics simulation. The global range of value of the rectus femoris force is from 2327.59 ± 39.32 N to 3353.16 ± 383.8 N at the peak level. The global range of value of the gracilis force is from 143.53 ± 2.35 N to 159.27 ± 8 N at the peak level. Cumulative probability functions of these ranges were presented and discussed. Our study suggested that under input data uncertainties, the musculoskeletal simulation results needs to be determined within a global range of values. Consequently, the clinical use of such global range will make the decision making more reliable. Thus, our study could be used as a guideline for such a purpose.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Viceconti, M., Clapworthy, G., Van Sint Jan, S.: The Virtual Physiological Human - a European initiative for in silico human modelling. Journal of Physiological Sciences 58(7), 441–446 (2008)
Périé, D., Sales De Gauzy, J., Ho Ba Tho, M.C.: Biomechanical evaluation of Cheneau-Toulouse-Munster brace in the treatment of scoliosis using optimisation approach and finite element method. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 40(3), 296–301 (2002)
Chabanas, M., Luboz, V., Payan, Y.: Patient specific Finite Element model of the face soft tissue for computer-assisted maxillofacial surgery. Medical Image Analysis 7(2), 131–151 (2003)
Arnold, A.S., Delp, S.L.: Computer modeling of gait abnormalities in cerebral palsy: application to treatment planning. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 6, 305–312 (2005)
Dao, T.T., Marin, F., Pouletaut, P., Aufaure, P., Charleux, F.: Ho Ba Tho, M.C. Estimation of Accuracy of Patient Specific Musculoskeletal Modeling: Case Study on a Post Polio Residual Paralysis Subject. Computer Method in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 15(7), 745–751 (2012)
Fregly, B.J., Boninger, M.L., Reinkensmeyer, D.J.: Personalized neuromusculoskeletal modeling to improve treatment of mobility impairments: a perspective from European research sites. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 9(18), 1–11 (2012)
Dao, T.T., Pouletaut, P., Charleux, F., Lazáry, Á., Eltes, P., Varga, P.P., Ho Ba Tho, M.C.: Estimation of Patient Specific Lumbar Spine Muscle Forces Using Multi-Physical Musculoskeletal Model and Dynamic MRI. In: Huynh, V.N., Denoeux, T., Tran, D.H., Le, A.C., Pham, B.S. (eds.) KSE 2013, Part II. AISC, vol. 245, pp. 425–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Dao, T.T., Marin, F., Ho Ba Tho, M.C.: Sensitivity of the anthropometrical and geometrical parameters of the bones and muscles on a musculoskeletal model of the lower limbs. In: Proceedings of the 31th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 5251–5254 (2009)
Pàmies-Vilà, R., Font-Llagunes, J.M., Cuadrado, J., Alonso, F.J.: Analysis of different uncertainties in the inverse dynamic analysis of human gait. Mechanism and Machine Theory 58, 153–164 (2012)
Dao, T.T.: Ho Ba Tho, M.C. Uncertainty Modeling of Input Data for a Biomechanical System of Systems. In: Proceedings of 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 4581–4584 (2013)
Nagano, A., Gerritsen, K.G.M., Fukashiro, S.: A sensitivity analysis of the calculation of mechanical output through inverse dynamics: a computer simulation study. Journal of Biomechanics 33(10), 1313–1318 (2000)
Silva, M.P.T., Ambrósio, J.A.C.: Sensitivity of the results produced by the inverse dynamic analysis of a human stride to perturbed input data. Gait & Posture 19(1), 35–49 (2004)
Rao, G., Amarantini, D., Berton, E., Favier, D.: Influence of body segments’ parameters estimation models on inverse dynamics solutions during gait. Journal of Biomechanics 39(8), 1531–1536 (2006)
Scovil, C.Y., Ronsky, J.L.: Sensitivity of a Hill-based muscle model to perturbations in model parameters. Journal of Biomechanics 39(11), 2055–2063 (2006)
Lawson, S.E.M., Chteau, H., Pourcelot, P., Denoix, J.M., Crevier-Denoix, N.: Sensitivity of an equine distal limb model to perturbations in tendon paths, origins and insertions. Journal of Biomechanics 40(11), 2510–2516 (2007)
Chen, L., Ren, L.: The Influence of Intrinsic Muscle Properties on Musculoskeletal System Stability: A Modelling Study. Journal of Bionic Engineering 7, S158–S165 (2010)
Carbone, V., van der Krogt, M.M., Koopman, H.F.J.M., Verdonschot, N.: Sensitivity of subject-specific models to errors in musculo-skeletal geometry. Journal of Biomechanics 45(14), 2476–2480 (2012)
Ackland, D.C., Lin, Y.C., Pandy, M.G.: Sensitivity of model predictions of muscle function to changes in moment arms and muscle-tendon properties: A Monte-Carlo analysis. Journal of Biomechanics 45(8), 1463–1471 (2012)
Delp, S.L., Anderson, F.C., Arnold, A.S., Loan, P., Habib, A., John, C.T., Guendelman, E., Thelen, D.G.: OpenSim: Open-source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 54(11), 1940–1950 (2007)
Thelen, D.G., Anderson, F.C., Delp, S.L.: Generating dynamic simulations of movement using computed muscle control. J. Biomech. 36, 321–328
Dempster, W.T., Gaughran, G.R.L.: Properties of body segments based on size and weight. American Journal of Anatomy 120, 33–54 (1967)
Clauser, C.E., McConville, J.T., Young, J.W.: Weight, volume and center of mass of segments of the human body. AMRL-TR-69-70. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio (1969)
Erdemir, A., McLean, S., Herzog, W., van den Bogert, A.J.: Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. Clin. Biomech. 22, 131–154 (2007)
Wesseling, M., de Groote, F., Jonkers, I.: The effect of perturbing body segment parameters on calculated joint moments and muscle forces during gait. J. Biomech. 47(2), 596–601 (2014)
May, B., Saha, S., Saltzman, M.: A three-dimensional mathematical model of temporomandibular joint loading. Clinical Biomechanics 16, 489–495 (2001)
van Den Bogert, A.J., Hupperets, M., Schlarb, H., Krabbe, B.: Predictive musculoskeletal simulation using optimal control: effects of added limb mass on energy cost and kinematics of walking and running. J. Sports Eng. Technol. 226, 123–133 (2012)
Barrett, R.S., Besier, T.F., Lloyd, D.G.: Individual muscle contributions to the swing phase of gait: An EMG-based forward dynamics modelling approach. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 15 (9), 1146–1155 (2007)
Redl, C., Gfoehler, M., Pandy, M.G.: Sensitivity of muscle force estimates to variations in muscle-tendon properties. Human Movement Science 26(2), 306–319 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dao, T.T., Christine Ho Ba Tho, M. (2015). Uncertainty Modeling and Propagation in Musculoskeletal Modeling. In: Nguyen, VH., Le, AC., Huynh, VN. (eds) Knowledge and Systems Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11680-8_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11680-8_45
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11679-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11680-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)