An Experimental Comparison of Classical, FOND and Probabilistic Planning | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

An Experimental Comparison of Classical, FOND and Probabilistic Planning

  • Conference paper
KI 2014: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (KI 2014)

Abstract

Domain-independent planning in general is broadly applicable to a wide range of tasks. Many formalisms exist that allow the description of different aspects of realistic problems. Which one to use is often no obvious choice, since a higher degree of expressiveness usually comes with an increased planning time and/or a decreased policy quality. Under the assumption that hard guarantees are not required, users are faced with a decision between multiple approaches. As a generic model we use a probabilistic description in the form of Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). We define abstracting translations into a classical planning formalism and fully observable nondeterministic planning. Our goal is to give insight into how state-of-the-art systems perform on different MDP planning domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boutilier, C., Dearden, R., Goldszmidt, M.: Stochastic Dynamic Programming with Factored Representations. Artificial Intelligence (AIJ) 121(1-2), 49–107 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Culberson, J.C., Schaeffer, J.: Searching with pattern databases. In: McCalla, G.I. (ed.) Canadian AI 1996. LNCS, vol. 1081, pp. 402–416. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fu, J., Ng, V., Bastani, F.B., Yen, I.L.: Simple and fast strong cyclic planning for fully-observable nondeterministic planning problems. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 1949–1954 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gaschler, A., Petrick, R.P.A., Kröger, T., Knoll, A., Khatib, O.: Robot task planning with contingencies for run-time sensing. In: ICRA Workshop on Combining Task and Motion Planning (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen, E.A., Zilberstein, S.: LAO*: A heuristic search algorithm that finds solutions with loops. Artificial Intelligence 129(1-2), 35–62 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Haslum, P., Botea, A., Helmert, M., Bonet, B., Koenig, S.: Domain-independent construction of pattern database heuristics for cost-optimal planning. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 1007–1012 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Helmert, M.: The fast downward planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 26, 191–246 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaelbling, L., Lozano-Perez, T.: Hierarchical task and motion planning in the now. In: IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaelbling, L., Lozano-Perez, T.: Integrated task and motion planning in belief space. International Journal of Robotics Research (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keller, T., Eyerich, P.: A Polynomial All Outcomes Determinization for Probabilistic Planning. In: International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS), pp. 331–334. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keller, T., Eyerich, P.: PROST: Probabilistic Planning Based on UCT. In: International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS). pp. 119–127 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keller, T., Eyerich, P., Nebel, B.: Task planning for an autonomous service robot. In: Dillmann, R., Beyerer, J., Hanebeck, U.D., Schultz, T. (eds.) KI 2010. LNCS, vol. 6359, pp. 358–365. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Keller, T., Helmert, M.: Trial-based Heuristic Tree Search for Finite Horizon MDPs. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2013), pp. 135–143 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuter, U., Nau, D.S., Reisner, E., Goldman, R.P.: Using classical planners to solve nondeterministic planning problems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS), pp. 190–197 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Little, I., Thiébaux, S.: Probabilistic planning vs replanning. In: ICAPS Workshop on IPC: Past, Present and Future (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mattmüller, R., Ortlieb, M., Helmert, M., Bercher, P.: Pattern database heuristics for fully observable nondeterministic planning. In: International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS), pp. 105–112 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Muise, C.J., McIlraith, S.A., Beck, J.C.: Improved non-deterministic planning by exploiting state relevance. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nebel, B., Dornhege, C., Hertle, A.: How much does a household robot need to know in order to tidy up your home? In: AAAI Workshop on Intelligent Robotic Systems (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hertle, A., Dornhege, C., Keller, T., Mattmüller, R., Ortlieb, M., Nebel, B. (2014). An Experimental Comparison of Classical, FOND and Probabilistic Planning. In: Lutz, C., Thielscher, M. (eds) KI 2014: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8736. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11206-0_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11206-0_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11205-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11206-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics