Abstract
It is often the case that in the current literature, the term “QoE” is used in contexts where “QoS” would be more appropriate. This is likely due to several reasons, one of which being the current popularity of all things related with QoE, but more fundamentally it is due to the boundaries between QoS and QoE not being clearly defined—and indeed, sometimes hard to define clearly. QoE is an intrinsically multi-disciplinary field, and practitioners from different backgrounds see it, quite naturally, from different perspectives colored by their own expertise. For networking people, in particular, QoE is sometimes seen as a simple extension, or even a re-branding, of the well-established concept of QoS. In this chapter we will delve into the differences and commonalities between the two, with the goal of easing and encouraging their proper use.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
This definition was also used more recently in the third amendment to ITU-T P.10/G.100 [21].
- 2.
The reader will note that this ordering is rather arbitrary. Researchers with a background in network performance evaluation will probably have a different view than those with a background in traffic engineering, etc.
References
Agboma F, Liotta A (2008) QoE-aware QoS management. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on advances in mobile computing and multimedia, ACM, pp 111–116
Ameigeiras P, Ramos-Munoz JJ, Navarro-Ortiz J, Mogensen P, Lopez-Soler JM (2010) QoE oriented cross-layer design of a resource allocation algorithm in beyond-3G systems. Comput Commun 33(5):571–582
Aristomenopoulos G, Kastrinogiannis T, Kaldanis V, Karantonis G, Papavassiliou S (2010) A novel framework for dynamic utility-based QoE provisioning in wireless networks. In: Global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM 2010), IEEE, pp 1–6
Batteram H, Damm G, Mukhopadhyay A, Philippart L, Odysseos R, Urrutia-Valdés C (2010) Delivering quality of experience in multimedia networks. Bell Labs Tech J 15(1):175–193
Bouch A, Sasse MA, DeMeer H (2000) Of packets and people: a user-centered approach to quality of service. In: Eighth international workshop on quality of service, 2000. IWQOS, IEEE, pp 189–197
Crawley E, Sandick H, Nair R, Rajagopalan B (1998) A framework for QoS-based routing in the internet. IETF RFC 2386
Egger S, Reichl P, Hoßfeld T, Schatz R (2012) Time is bandwidth? Narrowing the gap between subjective time perception and quality of experience. In: IEEE international conference on communications (ICC 2012), Ottawa, Canada
ETSI: ETR 003 (1994) Network aspects (NA); general aspects of quality of service (QoS) and network performance (NP)
Fiedler M, Hoßfeld T (2010) Quality of experience-related differential equations and provisioning-delivery hysteresis. In: 21st ITC specialist seminar on multimedia applications-traffic, performance and QoE, Miyazaki, Japan
Fiedler M, Hoßfeld T, Tran-Gia P (2010) A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service. IEEE Netw 24(2):36–41
Gozdecki J, Jajszczyk A, Stankiewicz R (2003) Quality of service terminology in IP networks. IEEE Commun Mag 41(3):153–159
ITU-T: Recommendation G.1000 (2001) Communications quality of service: a framework and definitions
ITU-T: Recommendation G.1010 (2001) End-user multimedia QoS categories
ITU-T: Recommendation P.862 (2001) Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), an objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrowband telephone networks and speech codecs
ITU-T: Recommendation P.863 (2001) Perceptual objective listening quality assessment
ITU-T: Recommendation H.360 (2004) An architecture for end-to-end QoS control and signalling
ITU-T: Recommendation G.1030 (2005) Estimating end-to-end performance in IP networks for data applications
ITU-T: Recommendation E.800 (2008) Definitions of terms related to quality of service
ITU-T: Recommendation Y.1540 (2011) Internet protocol data communication service G IP packet transfer and availability performance parameters
ITU-T: Recommendation Y.1541 (2011) Network performance objectives for IP-based services
ITU-T: Recommendation P.10/G.100 Amendment 3 (2012) New definitions for inclusion in recommendation ITU-T P.10/G.100
ITU-T: Recommendation P.1201 (2012) Parametric non-intrusive assessment of audiovisual media streaming quality
ITU-T: Recommendation G.1011 (2013) Reference guide to quality of experience assessment methodologies
Jammeh E, Mkwawa I, Khan A, Goudarzi M, Sun L, Ifeachor E (2012) Quality of experience (QoE) driven adaptation scheme for voice/video over IP. Telecommun Syst 49(1):99–111
Jin J, Nahrstedt K (2004) QoS specification languages for distributed multimedia applications: a survey and taxonomy. IEEE Trans Multimedia 11(3):74–87
Lazzara S, Roella A, Moschetti L (2012) Deliverable 8.2: live test report. Technical report, FP7 Optiband project
Le Callet P, Möller S, Perkis A (eds) (2012) Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience
Lewcio B, Belmudez B, Enghardt T, Möller S (2011) On the way to high-quality video calls in future mobile networks. In: Third international workshop on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX), 2011, pp 43–48
Martini MG, Chen CW, Chen Z, Dagiuklas T, Sun L, Zhu X (2012) Guest editorial: QoE-aware wireless multimedia systems. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 30(7):1153–1156
Möller S, Schmidt S, Beyer J (2013) Gaming taxonomy: an overview of concepts and evaluation methods for computer gaming QoE. In: International workshop on quality of multimedia experience, QoMEX, pp 1–6
Möller S et al (2009) A taxonomy of quality of service and quality of experience of multimodal human-machine interaction. In: International workshop on quality of multimedia experience, QoMEX, pp 7–12
Picovici D, Denieffe D, Kastrati Z (2013) Enhanced network based model for measuring online games quality of experience. Dev Appl Syst 13
Raake A, Gustafsson J, Argyropoulos S, Garcia M, Lindegren D, Heikkila G, Pettersson M, List P, Feiten B (2011) IP-based mobile and fixed network audiovisual media services. IEEE Signal Process Mag 28(6):68–79
Reichl P, Egger S, Schatz R, D’Alconzo A (2010) The logarithmic nature of QoE and the role of the Weber-Fechner law in QoE assessment. In: IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), 2010, IEEE, pp 1–5
Ries M, Svoboda P, Rupp M (2008) Empirical study of subjective quality for massive multiplayer games. In: 15th International conference on systems, signals and image processing. IWSSIP 2008, IEEE, pp 181–184
Rubino G, Varela M (2004) A new approach for the prediction of end-to-end performance of multimedia streams. In: First international conference on quantitative evaluation of systems (QEST’04)
Schatz R, Hoßfeld T, Janowski L, Egger S (2013) From packets to people: quality of experience as a new measurement challenge. In: Biersack E, Callegari C, Matijasevic M (eds) Data traffic monitoring and analysis. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 7754. Springer, Berlin, pp 219–263
Seppänen J, Varela M (2013) QoE-driven network management for real-time over-the-top multimedia services. In: IEEE wireless communications and networking conference 2013, Shanghai, China
Shaikh J, Fiedler M, Collange D (2010) Quality of Experience from User and Network Perspectives. Annales des télécommunications (Ann Telecommun) 65(1–2):47–57
Staehle B, Hirth M, Pries R, Wamser F, Staehle D (2011) Aquarema in action: improving the YouTube QoE in wireless mesh networks. In: Internet communications (BCFIC Riga), 2011 Baltic congress on future, IEEE, pp 33–40
Thakolsri S, Kellerer W, Steinbach E (2011) QoE-based cross-layer optimization of wireless video with unperceivable temporal video quality fluctuation. In: IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), 2011, IEEE, pp 1–6
Varela M, Laulajainen JP (2011) QoE-driven mobility management—integrating the users’ quality perception into network-level decision making. In: Third international workshop on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX), 2011, pp 19–24
Acknowledgments
The ideas presented in this chapter are partially based on the concepts presented in Chap. 7 of [27]; the contributions of the co-authors of that chapter are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Varela, M., Skorin-Kapov, L., Ebrahimi, T. (2014). Quality of Service Versus Quality of Experience. In: Möller, S., Raake, A. (eds) Quality of Experience. T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02681-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02681-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02680-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02681-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)