Abstract
We consider the complexity of finding envy-free allocations for the class of graphical valuations. Graphical valuations were introduced by Christodoulou et al. [14] as a structured class of valuations that admit allocations that are envy-free up to any item(EFX). These are valuations where every item is valued by two agents, lending a (simple) graph structure to the utilities, where the agents are vertices and are adjacent if and only if they value a (unique) common item. Finding envy-free allocations for general valuations is known to be computationally intractable even for very special cases: in particular, even for binary valuations, and even for identical valuations with two agents. We show that, for binary graphical valuations, the existence of envy-free allocations can be determined in polynomial time. In contrast, we also show that allowing for even slightly more general utilities \(\{0,1,d\}\) leads to intractability even for graphical valuations. This motivates other approaches to tractability, and to that end, we exhibit the fixed-parameter tractability of the problem parameterized by the vertex cover number of the graph when the number of distinct utilities is bounded. We also show that, all graphical instances that admit EF allocations also admit one that is non-wasteful. Since EFX allocations are possibly wasteful, we also address the question of determining the price of fairness of EFX allocations. We show that the price of EFX with respect to utilitarian welfare is one for binary utilities, but can be arbitrarily large \(\{0, 1, d\}\) valuations. We also show the hardness of deciding the existence of an EFX allocation which is also welfare-maximizing and of finding a welfare-maximizing allocation within the set of EFX allocations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
We refer the reader to next section for the definition of EFX.
- 2.
An algorithm that runs in time f(k)poly(n, m) where f is some computable function of the parameter k.
References
Akrami, H., Alon, N., Chaudhury, B.R., Garg, J., Mehlhorn, K., Mehta, R.: EFX: a simpler approach and an (almost) optimal guarantee via rainbow cycle number. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC 2023, p. 61. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2023)
Aumann, Y., Dombb, Y.: The efficiency of fair division with connected pieces. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. 3(4) (2015)
Aziz, H., Gaspers, S., Mackenzie, S., Walsh, T.: Fair assignment of indivisible objects under ordinal preferences. Artif. Intell. 227, 71–92 (2015)
Bei, X., Lu, X., Manurangsi, P., Suksompong, W.: The Price of Fairness for Indivisible Goods. Theory Comput. Syst. 65(7), 1069–1093 (2021)
Berger, B., Cohen, A., Feldman, M., Fiat, A.: Almost full EFX exists for four agents. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 4826–4833 (2022)
Bertsimas, D., Farias, V.F., Trichakis, N.: The Price of Fairness. Oper. Res. 59(1), 17–31 (2011)
Bhaskar, U., Misra, N., Sethia, A., Vaish, R.: The price of equity with binary valuations and few agent types. In: Deligkas, A., Filos-Ratsikas, A. (eds.) SAGT 2023. LNCS, vol. 14238, pp. 271–289. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43254-5_16
Bilò, V., et al.: Almost envy-free allocations with connected bundles. Games Econom. Behav. 131, 197–221 (2022)
Bu, X., Song, J., Yu, Z.: EFX allocations exist for binary valuations. In: Li, M., Sun, X., Wu, X. (eds.) IJTCS-FAW 2023. LNCS, vol. 13933, pp. 252–262. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39344-0_19
Budish, E.: The combinatorial assignment problem: approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes. J. Polit. Econ. 119(6), 1061–1103 (2011)
Caragiannis, I., Gravin, N., Huang, X.: Envy-freeness up to any item with high nash welfare: the virtue of donating items. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 527–545 (2019)
Caragiannis, I., Kaklamanis, C., Kanellopoulos, P., Kyropoulou, M.: The efficiency of fair division. Theory Comput. Syst. 50(4), 589–610 (2012)
Chaudhury, B.R., Garg, J., Mehlhorn, K.: EFX exists for three agents. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC 2020, pp. 1–19. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020)
Christodoulou, G., Fiat, A., Koutsoupias, E., Sgouritsa, A.: Fair allocation in graphs. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC 2023, pp. 473–488. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2023)
Deligkas, A., Eiben, E., Ganian, R., Hamm, T., Ordyniak, S.: The parameterized complexity of connected fair division. In: IJCAI, pp. 139–145 (2021)
Foley, D.: Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Econ. Essays 45–98 (1967)
Freeman, R., Sikdar, S., Vaish, R., Xia, L.: Equitable allocations of indivisible goods. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 280–286 (2019)
Gamow, G., Stern, M.: Puzzle-Math (1958)
Garg, J., Taki, S.: An improved approximation algorithm for maximin shares. Artif. Intell. 300, 103547 (2021)
Gourvès, L., Monnot, J., Tlilane, L.: Near fairness in matroids. In: Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 393–398 (2014)
Lenstra, H.W., Jr.: Integer programming with a fixed number of variables. Math. Oper. Res. 8(4), 538–548 (1983)
Lipton, R.J., Markakis, E., Mossel, E., Saberi, A.: On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC 2004, pp. 125–131. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2004)
Lipton, R.J., Markakis, E., Mossel, E., Saberi, A.: On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 125–131 (2004)
Payan, J., Sengupta, R., Viswanathan, V.: Relaxations of envy-freeness over graphs. In: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems,AAMAS 2023, pp. 2652–2654. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2023)
Plaut, B., Roughgarden, T.: Almost envy-freeness with general valuations. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 34(2), 1039–1068 (2020)
Steinhaus, H.: The problem of fair division. Econometrica 16(1), 101–104 (1948)
Sun, A., Chen, B., Doan, X.V.: Equitability and welfare maximization for allocating indivisible items. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 37(8) (2023)
Sun, A., Chen, B., Vinh Doan, X.: Connections between fairness criteria and efficiency for allocating indivisible chores. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 1281–1289 (2021)
Zeng, J.A., Mehta, R.: On the structure of envy-free orientations on graphs (2024)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Misra, N., Sethia, A. (2025). Envy-Free and Efficient Allocations for Graphical Valuations. In: Freeman, R., Mattei, N. (eds) Algorithmic Decision Theory. ADT 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 15248. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73903-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73903-3_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-73902-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-73903-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)