Abstract
The manufacturing industry contributes to climate change and must take action to reach its high-set target. Implementation of circularity to reach sustainability has shown to be beneficial for products, but there is a lack of knowledge on how to transfer the concept to the design of factories. The purpose of the paper is to identify and systemically analyse areas of importance to enable circularity in production development to better understand what requires attention to achieve a circular factory. The focus of the study is on production development narrowed down to production equipment. A case study approach was used with interviews as the main method for data collection. Four main themes were identified: competence, collaboration, mindset and time. These were considered as areas of importance to enable circularity and to understand what needs further attention they were analysed in a systemic view of macro-, meso- and microlevel. The findings stress the need for investing in circularity in early phases to achieve circularity and that all levels of the industry need to take part in the transition towards circularity. Further, research within areas with similar complexities could benefit and learn from each other.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
United Nations Environment Programme. UNEP circularity platform. 2019 [cited 2023 2023–05–05]. https://buildingcircularity.org/
Bakker, C.A., et al.: Understanding and managing product lifetimes in support of a circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 279, 123764 (2021)
Erumban, A.A.: Lifetimes of machinery and equipment: evidence from dutch manufacturing. The Review of Income and Wealth 54(2), 237–268 (2008)
Lewis, H., et al.: Design + Environment: a Global Guide to Designing Greener Goods. (1 ed.), Routledge, Sheffield (2001)
Sjödin, D., Frishammar, J., Eriksson, P.E.: Managing uncertainty and equivocality in joint process development projects. J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 39 (2016)
Sjödin, D., Eriksson, P.E., Frishammar, J.: Open innovation in process industries: a lifecycle perspective on development of process equipment. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 56, 225–240 (2011)
Bertassini, A.C., et al.: Circular business ecosystem innovation: a guide for mapping stakeholders, capturing values, and finding new opportunities. Sustainable Production and Consumption 27, 436–448 (2021)
Chrispim, M.C., Mattsson, M., Ulvenblad, P.: The underrepresented key elements of circular economy: a critical review of assessment tools and a guide for action. Sustainable Production and Consumption 35, 539–558 (2023)
Dzombak, R., Antonopoulos, C., Dillon, H.E.: Balancing technological innovation with waste burden minimization: an examination of the global lighting industry. Waste Manage. 92, 68–74 (2019)
Sumter, D., et al.: Key Competencies for Design in a Circular Economy: Exploring Gaps in Design Knowledge and Skills for a Circular Economy. Sustainability 13 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020776
Lim, M.K., et al.: Circular economy to ensure production operational sustainability: a green-lean approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption 30, 130–144 (2022)
Rathi, R., et al.: Green lean six sigma for improving manufacturing sustainability: framework development and validation. J. Clean. Prod. 345, 131130 (2022)
Kurdve, M., Bellgran, M.: Green lean operationalisation of the circular economy concept on production shop floor level. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 123223 (2021)
Bjørnbet, M.M., et al.: Circular economy in manufacturing companies: a review of case study literature. J. Clean. Prod. 294, 126268 (2021)
Säfsten, K., Bellgran, M.: Production Development: Design and Operation of Production Systems. 1. Aufl. ed. Springer Verlag London Limited, London (2009)
Cochran, D.S., et al.: A decomposition approach for manufacturing system design. J. Manuf. Syst. 20(6), 371–389 (2001)
Bellgran, M.: Systematic Design of Assembly Systems : Preconditions and Design Process Planning, in Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertations, Linköping University, Linköping, p. 191 (1998)
Kampker, A., et al.: Life cycle oriented evaluation of flexibility in investment decisions for automated assembly systems. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 6(4), 274–280 (2013)
Cao, H., Folan, P.: Product life cycle: the evolution of a paradigm and literature review from 1950–2009. Production Planning & Control 23(8), 641–662 (2012)
Wiktorsson, M.: Performance assessment of assembly systems. In: TRITA-MSM. Institutionen för produktionssystem, p. x, 175 (2000)
Tam, E., Soulliere, K., Sawyer-Beaulieu, S.: Managing complex products to support the circular economy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 145, 124–125 (2019)
Islam, M.H., Chavez, Z., Bellgran, M.: An exploratory study on integrating sustainability aspects during the acquisition of production equipment. In: 9th Swedish Production Symposium, SPS 2020, 7-8 October 2020, Jönköping, Sweden. IOS Press, pp. 59-70 (2020)
Tura, N., et al.: Unlocking circular business: a framework of barriers and drivers. J. Clean. Prod. 212, 90–98 (2019)
Grafström, J., Aasma, S.: Breaking circular economy barriers. J. Clean. Prod. 292, 126002 (2021)
Hummen, T., Desing, H.: When to replace products with which (circular) strategy? an optimization approach and lifespan indicator. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 174, 105704 (2021)
Kirchherr, J., et al.: Conceptualizing the circular economy (revisited): an analysis of 221 definitions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 194, 107001 (2023)
Wouterszoon Jansen, B., et al.: A circular economy life cycle costing model (CE-LCC) for building components. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 161, 104857 (2020)
Pomponi, F., Moncaster, A.: Circular economy for the built environment: a research framework. J. Clean. Prod. 143, 710–718 (2017)
Figge, F., Thorpe, A.S., Good, J.: Us before me: a group level approach to the circular economy. Ecol. Econ. 179, 106838 (2021)
Potting, J., et al.: Circular Economy: Measuring Innovation in the Product Chain (2017)
Franciosi, C., et al.: Maintenance for Sustainability in the Industry 4.0 context: a Scoping Literature Review. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(11), 903–908 (2018)
Turner, C., et al.: A digital maintenance practice framework for circular production of automotive parts. IFAC-PapersOnLine 53(3), 19–24 (2020)
Aberdeen, T., Yin, R.K.: Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. The Canadian Journal of Action Research 14(1), 69–71 (2009)
Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532–550 (1989)
Säfsten, K., Gustavsson, M., Ehnsiö, R.: Research methodology : for engineers and other problem-solvers. Studentlitteratur AB (2020)
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M.: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage (1994)
Acknowledgements
The research is a part of the VINNOVA-founded project Green Design. Interviews were made in collaboration with Lotta Bohlin.
Disclosure of Interests.
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Elvin, M., Bruch, J., Aslanidou, I., Bellgran, M., Bohlin, L. (2024). Investing Ahead - Industrial Outlook on Circularity Within Production Development. In: Thürer, M., Riedel, R., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous Environments. APMS 2024. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 728. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71622-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71622-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-71621-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-71622-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)