Leveraging OpenAI API for Developing a Monopoly Game-Inspired Educational Tool Fostering Collaborative Learning and Self-efficacy | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Leveraging OpenAI API for Developing a Monopoly Game-Inspired Educational Tool Fostering Collaborative Learning and Self-efficacy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovative Technologies and Learning (ICITL 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14786))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 603 Accesses

Abstract

This research develops a game-based learning programming language framework generated using GAI. The game-based learning structure developed is analogous to the Monopoly Game, with the exception that the original game's real estate buying and selling is absent, and instead, the grids are moved in a square matrix according to the dice rolls. Additionally, the programming questions are answered in each grid, and the money obtained is replaced by the points obtained by answering questions. Participants answer the programming learning questions generated by GAI to obtain points. The students participating in the programme learn through gamification, which enables them to learn JavaScript programming in actual operations. The process also incorporates cooperative learning elements, allowing contestants in the same session to discuss with each other in order to obtain the highest total score of the contestants in that session.

The results of the experimental phase indicate that the game-based learning system, which generates questions through GAI, has a significant impact on improving students’ self-efficacy in aspects such as logical thinking, control, and debugging. The impact of the cooperative learning project is less significant, while that of the algorithm project is negligible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 7435
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 9294
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson, D., Johnson, R.: Learning together and alone: overview and meta-analysis. Asia Pacific J. Educ. 22, 95–105 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khoshnoodifar, M., Ashouri, A., Taheri, M.: Effectiveness of gamification in enhancing learning and attitudes: a study of statistics education for health school students. J. Adv. Med. Educ. Prof. 11(4), 230–239 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Learning Community. WikiPedia Homepage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_community. Accessed 22 Mar 2024

  4. Oladimeji, A.I., Njoku, C., Yusuf, H.A.: Enhancing the teaching and learning of computer programming using collaborative method of delivery. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Res. Eng. (IJASRE) 7(1) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Park, J., Ji, H., Jo, J., Lim, H.: A method for measuring cooperative activities in a social network supported learning environment. Wireless Pers. Commun. 89, 863–879 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-3100-

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Proulx, J.-N., Romero, M., Arnab, S.: Learning mechanics and game mechanics under the perspective of self determination theory to foster motivation in digital game based learning. Simul. Gaming 48(17), 81–97 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Puma, M.J., Jones, C.C., Rock, D., Fernandez, R.: Prospects: the congressionally mandated study of educational growth and opportunity. Interim Report. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Slavin, R.: Research on cooperative learning and achievement: what we know, what we need to know. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 21, 43–69 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smiderle, R., Rigo, S.J., Marques, L.B., et al.: The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learn. Environ. 7(1), 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trejos-Buritica, O.: Methodology teamwork’s 4321 to improve learning in computer programming using collaborative learning and cooperative learning. Revista Educacion en Ingenieria 13(25), 28–36 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tsai, M.-J., Wang, C.-Y., Hsu, P.-F.: Developing the computer programming self-efficacy scale for computer literacy education. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 56(8), 1345–1360 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Yi Lu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table Retained Items in the Computer Programming Self-Efficacy Scale [11].

Control:

I can open and save a program in a program editor

I can edit and revise a program in a program editor

I can run and test a program in a program editor

Logical Thinking:

I can understand the basic logical structure of a program

I can understand a conditional expression such as ‘‘if… Else…’’

I can predict the final result of a program with logical conditions

I can predict the result of a program when given its input values

Debug:

I can find the origin of an error while testing a program

I can fix an error while testing a program

I can learn more about programming via the debugging process

Cooperation:

I know programming work can be divided into sub-tasks for people

I can work with others while writing a program

I can make use of divisions to enhance programming efficiency

Algorithm:

I can figure out program procedures without a sample

I don’t need others’ help to construct a program

I can make use of programming to solve a problem

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lu, CY., Chen, I. (2024). Leveraging OpenAI API for Developing a Monopoly Game-Inspired Educational Tool Fostering Collaborative Learning and Self-efficacy. In: Cheng, YP., Pedaste, M., Bardone, E., Huang, YM. (eds) Innovative Technologies and Learning. ICITL 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14786. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65884-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65884-6_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-65883-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-65884-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics