Abstract
This study examines how engagement-maximizing recommender systems influence the visibility of Members of Parliament’s tweets in timelines. Leveraging engagement predictive models and Twitter data, we evaluate various recommender systems. Our analysis reveals that prioritizing engagement decreases the ideological diversity of the audiences reached by Members of Parliament and increases the reach disparities between political groups. When evaluating the algorithmic amplification within the general population, engagement-based timelines confer greater advantages to mainstream right-wing parties compared to their left-wing counterparts. However, when considering users’ individual political leanings, engagement-based timelines amplify ideologically aligned content. We stress the need for audits accounting for user characteristics when assessing the distortions introduced by personalization algorithms and advocate addressing online platform regulations by directly evaluating the metrics platforms aim to optimize, beyond the mere algorithmic implementation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Huszár, F., Ktena, S., O’Brien, C., Belli, L., Schlaikjer, A., Hardt, M.: Algorithmic amplification of politics on Twitter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119(1), e2025334119 (2021 12). https://doi.org/10.1073%252Fpnas.2025334119
Kmetty, Z., et al.: Determinants of willingness to donate data from social media platforms. (Center for Open Science, 2023, 3). https://doi.org/10.31219%252Fosf.io%252Fncwkt
Belli, L. et al.: Privacy-Aware Recommender Systems Challenge on Twitter’s Home Timeline (2020)
Belli, L. el at.: The 2021 RecSys Challenge Dataset: Fairness is not optional. In: RecSysChallenge ’21: Proceedings Of The Recommender Systems Challenge 2021. (2021 10). https://doi.org/10.1145%252F3487572.3487573
Satuluri, V., et al.: Proceedings of The 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2020 8). https://doi.org/10.1145%252F3394486.3403370
Bouchaud, P. Skewed perspectives: Examining the Influence of Engagement Maximization on Content Diversity in Social Media Feeds. (2023 6). https://hal.science/hal-04139494 preprint
Jolly, S., et al.: Chapel hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2019. Electoral Stud. 75 102420 (2022 2). https://doi.org/10.1016%252Fj.electstud.2021.102420
Rathje, S., Bavel, J., Linden, S.: Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118 (2021 6). https://doi.org/10.1073%252Fpnas.2024292118
Ribeiro, M., Veselovsky, V., West, R.: The Amplification Paradox in Recommender Systems (2023)
Chavalarias, D., Bouchaud, P., Panahi, M.: Can a single line of code change society? the systemic risks of optimizing engagement in recommender systems on global information flow, opinion dynamics and social structures. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 27(1), 9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.5203
Rossi, W., Polderman, J., Frasca, P.: The closed loop between opinion formation and personalized recommendations. IEEE Trans. Control Netw. Syst. Trans. Contr. Netw. Syst. 9, 1092–1103 (2022 9). https://doi.org/10.1109%252Ftcns.2021.3105616
Bouchaud, P., Chavalarias, D., Panahi, M.: Crowdsourced audit of Twitter’s recommender systems. Sci. Rep. 13, 16815 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43980-4
Milli, S., Carroll, M., Pandey, S., Wang, Y., Dragan, A. Twitter’s Algorithm: Amplifying Anger, Animosity, and Affective Polarization (2023)
Bavel, J., Rathje, S., Harris, E., Robertson, C., Sternisko, A.: How social media shapes polarization. Trends in Cogn. Sci. 25, 913–916 (2021 11). https://doi.org/10.1016%252Fj.tics.2021.07.013
Grover, A., Leskovec, J.: node2vec. In: Proceedings Of The 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference On Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. (2016 8). https://doi.org/10.1145%252F2939672.2939754
Ke, G., et al.: LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30 (NIP 2017). (2017,12)
Barbiero, P., Squillero, G., Tonda, A.: Modeling generalization in machine learning: a methodological and computational study (2020)
Milli, S., Pierson, E., Garg, N.: Balancing Value, Strategy, and Noise in Recommender Systems, Choosing the Right Weights (2023)
Gaumont, N., Panahi, M., Chavalarias, D.: Reconstruction of the socio-semantic dynamics of political activist Twitter networks-Method and application to the 2017 French presidential election. PLoS ONE ONE. 13, e0201879 (2018 9). https://doi.org/10.1371%252Fjournal.pone.0201879
Hargreaves, E., Agosti, C., Menasche, D., Neglia, G., Reiffers-Masson, A., Altman, E.: Biases in the facebook news feed: a case study on the Italian elections. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis And Mining (ASONAM) (2018 8). https://doi.org/10.1109%5C%252Fasonam.2018.8508659
Brady, W., Wills, J., Jost, J., Tucker, J., Bavel, J.: Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 7313–7318 (2017 6). https://doi.org/10.1073%252Fpnas.1618923114
Bartley, N., Abeliuk, A., Ferrara, E., Lerman, K.: Auditing algorithmic bias on twitter. In: 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021 (2021 6). https://doi.org/10.1145%252F3447535.3462491
Bandy, J., Diakopoulos, N.: More accounts, fewer links. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. On Human-Computer Interaction. 5, 1–28 (2021 4). https://doi.org/10.1145%5C%252F3449152
Guess, A., et al.: How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign? Science. 381, 398–404 (2023 7). https://doi.org/10.1126%252Fscience.abp9364
Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., Bastian, M.: ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the gephi software. PLoS ONE ONE. 9, e98679 (2014 6). https://doi.org/10.1371%252Fjournal.pone.0098679
Twitter TweepCred. GitHub. https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm/blob/main/src/scala/com/twitter/graph/batch/job/tweepcred
Twitter Source Code for Twitter’s recommendation algorithm: Heavy Ranker. GitHub. https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm-ml/blob/main/projects/home/recap
Twitter Twitter/the-Algorithm: Source Code for Twitter’s recommendation algorithm. GitHub. https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm
Twitter Twitter’s recommendation algorithm. Twitter. https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/open-source/2023/twitter-recommendation-algorithm
Twitter What Twitter learned from the Recsys 2020 challenge. Twitter. https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/insights/2020/what_twitter_learned_from_recsys2020
Acknowledgments
The author deeply thanks Pedro Ramaciotti Morales for his precious insights and Mazyiar Panahi for enabling the collection of the large-scale retweet network. Finally, the author acknowledges the Jean-Pierre Aguilar fellowship from the CFM Foundation for Research, the support and resources provided by the Complex Systems Institute of Paris Île-de-France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bouchaud, P. (2024). Algorithmic Amplification of Politics and Engagement Maximization on Social Media. In: Cherifi, H., Rocha, L.M., Cherifi, C., Donduran, M. (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications XII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2023. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1144. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53503-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53503-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53502-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53503-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)