Gap Analysis for CO2 Accounting Tool by Integrating Enterprise Resource Planning System Information | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 692))

Abstract

Detailed carbon accounting is the foundation for reducing CO2 emissions in manufacturing companies. However, existing accounting approaches are primarily based on manual data preparation, although manufacturing companies already have a variety of IT systems and resulting data available. The gap analysis carried out based on the GHG Protocol and an reference ERP system shows how much of the required information for CO2 accounting can be integrated from an ERP system. The ERP system can cover 20% of the required information. The information availability can be increased to 49% through additionally identified modifications of the ERP system. Integrating the CO2 accounting tool with other systems of the IT landscape, e.g. Energy Information System, enables an additional increase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
JPY 21449
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahmadi-Gh, Z., Bello-Pintado, A.: Why is manufacturing not more sustainable? the effects of different sustainability practices on sustainability outcomes and competitive advantage. J. Clean. Prod. 337, 130392 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Branco, A., Guizzardi, D., Jacome, F., Oom, D., et al.: Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (2022). http://data.europa.eu/89h/e0344cc3-e553-4dd4-ac4c-f569c8859e19. Accessed 02 Jun 2023

  3. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz Germany’s current climate action status (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steyrer, T., Docke, J., Ulmer, A., et al.: Klimamanagement in Unternehmen: Entwicklung eines Bausteins auf Grundlage des Umweltmanagementsystems EMAS (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koch, F., DiFant, O., Yazdandoost, O., et al.: CO2-Bilanzierung und Konzeptentwicklung zur CO2-Reduktion eines Dezernats der TU Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Saxce, M., Rabenasolo, B., Perwuelz, A., Quesne, A.: Development, documentation of Life cycle development, documentation of life cycle inventories (LCI) and LCA databases organisation. In: International Workshop on Green Supply Chain GSCrq (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saavedra-Rubio, K., Thonemann, N., Crenna, E., et al.: Stepwise guidance for data collection in the life cycle inventory (LCI) phase: building technology-re-lated LCI blocks. J. Clean. Prod. 366 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132903

  8. Boaden, R., Lockett, G.: Information technology, information systems and information management: definition and development. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 1(1), 23−32 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hack, S., Berg, C.: The Potential of IT for corporate sustainability. Sustainability 6, 4163–4180 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/su6074163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland (2021) Anteil der Unternehmen in Deutschland mit Nutzung einer ERP-Software, nach Unternehmensgröße im Jahr (2021). https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/795254/umfrage/einsatz-von-erp-software-in. Accessed 16 Apr 2023

  11. Schlich, M., Schlich, E. Consumer response to the product carbon foot-print (PCF). conference: life cycle assessment XI: green future markets 2(4), 95–102 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen, Q., Diaz-Rainey, I., Kuruppuarachchi, D.: Predicting corporate carbon footprints for climate finance risk analyses: a machine learning approach. Energy Econ. 95, 105129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ranganathan, J., Corbier, L., Bhatia, P., et al.: The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, Z., Sun, T., Yu, Y., et al.: Near-real-time carbon emission accounting technology toward carbon neutrality. Engineering 14, 44–51 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Böhm, U., Hildebrandt, A., Kästle, S.: Klimaneutralität in der Industrie. Springer, Berlin (2023)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. General Motors Corporation, World Resources Institute, British Petroleum Company et al. Safe Climate, Sound Business : an Action Agenda (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barrow, M., Buckley, B., Caldicott, T., et al.: Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions: Supplement to the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting & Reporting Standard (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vogel, O.: Software-Architektur: Grundlagen - Konzepte - Praxis, 2nd edn. Spektrum, Heidelberg (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanschke, I.: Strategic IT Management. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Winkler, U., Gilani, W.: Business continuity management of business driven IT landscapes. In: Handbook of Research on Service-Oriented Systems and Non-Functional Properties: Future Directions pp. 381−399. IGI Global (2012). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-432-1.ch017

  21. Kurbel, K.: ERP und SCM: Enterprise Resource Planning und Supply Chain Management in der Industrie, 9th edn. De Gruyter, Boston (2021)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Munkelt, T., Völker, S.: ERP systems: aspects of selection, implementation and sustainable operations. IJISPM 1, 25–39 (2013). https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm010202

  23. Külschbach, A.: Systematische Bewertung von Änderungsanfragen in der Produktion, 1st edn. Apprimus Wissenschaftsverlag, Aachen (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marra, M., Di Biccari, C., Lazoi, M., et al.: A gap analysis methodology for product lifecycle management assessment. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 65, 155–167 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2017.2762401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tontini, G., Dagostin Picolo, J.: Improvement gap analysis. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 20, 565–584 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521011092893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mineraud, J., Mazhelis, O., Su, X., et al.: A gap analysis of Internet-of-Things platforms. Comput. Commun. 89–90, 5–16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2016.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vorkapić, M., Ćoćkalo, D., Spasojević Brkić, V., et al.: Gap analysis and risk occurrence on the example of pressure transmitter`s production processes. Istrazivanja i Projektovanja za Privredu, 590–598 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes17-23443

  28. Sotos, M.: GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance: An amendment to the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Farsan, A., Chang, A., Kerkhof, A., Cserna, B., et al.: Value Change in the value chain: best practices in scope 3 greenhouse gas management. Sci. Based Targets Initiative (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. proALPHA proALPHA Application Guide. https://docs.proalpha.com/bun-dle/ApplicationGuide_9/page/misc/d__p_startseite.html. Accessed 29 Apr 2023

  31. IPCC EFDB emission factor database. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/EFDB/main.php. Accessed 16 Apr 2023

  32. Verwijmeren, M.: Software component architecture in supply chain management. Comput. Ind. 53, 165–178 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.com-pind.2003.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wenzel, P.: Personalwirtschaft mit SAP R/3. Vieweg, Wiesbaden (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Bleider, M.: Gestaltungsmodell eines Energieinformationssystems im Internet of Production. Dissertation. Apprimus Verlag, Aachen (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany ́ s Excellence Strategy – EXC-2023 Internet of Production – 390621612.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Perau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Perau, M., Seker, D., Schröer, T., Schuh, G. (2023). Gap Analysis for CO2 Accounting Tool by Integrating Enterprise Resource Planning System Information. In: Alfnes, E., Romsdal, A., Strandhagen, J.O., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management Systems for Responsible Manufacturing, Service, and Logistics Futures. APMS 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 692. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43688-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43688-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43687-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43688-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics