Abstract
As a novel Artificial Intelligence (AI) application, ChatGPT holds pertinence not only for the academic, medicine, law, computing or other sectors, but also for the public sector-case in point being the Open Government Data (OGD) initiative. However, though there has been some limited (as this topic is quite new) research concerning the capabilities ChatGPT in these sectors, there has been no research about the capabilities it can provide to government concerning its wide range of functions and activities. This paper contributes to filling this gap by investigating the capabilities that the ChatGPT can provide concerning one of most recently initiated and novel, and at the same time most promising, activities of government that aims to fuel the emerging data economy and society: the opening of large amounts of government data; furthermore, we investigate the public values that can be promoted through the use of ChatGPT in the area of OGD by both the data publishers as well as their users. At the same time, we investigate the issues that the use of ChatGPT in the area of OGD can pose, which can reduce the capabilities identified as aforesaid as well as the benefits and public values that can be generated from them. For these purposes interviews with 12 experts have been conducted and their responses have been analyzed. Finally, based on our findings we have developed a research agenda concerning the exploitation of ChatGPT application in the OGD domain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Open AI. ChatGPT. https://chat.openai.com/auth/login. Accessed 20 Feb 2023
Haque, M.U., Dharmadasa, I., Sworna, Z.T., Rajapakse, R.N., Ahmad, H.: “I think this is most disruptive technology”: exploring sentiments of ChatGPT early adopters using Twitter data (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.05856
Mashable. ChatGPT. https://mashable.com/category/chatgpt. Accessed 20 Feb 2023
Lund, B.D., Wang, T.: Chatting about ChatGPT: how many AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009 (2023, in press)
NBC News. Americans are wary of AI tech like ChatGPT, data shows. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgP6zlP1-OU. Accessed 20 Feb 2023
van Dis, E.A.M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., Bockting, C.L. ChatGPT: five pointers for research. Nature (2023). https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00288-7
CNET. Why we’re obsessed with the mind-blowing ChatGPT AI chatbot (2023). https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/why-were-all-obsessed-with-the-mind-blowing-chatgpt-ai-chatbot/
Ventayen, R.J.M.: OpenAI ChatGPT generated results: similarity index of artificial intelligence-based contents. SSRN (2023). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4332664
Aydin, O., Karaarslan, E.: OpenAI ChatGPT generated literature review: digital twin in healthcare. Emerg. Comput. Technol. 2, 22–31 (2022)
Choi, J.H., Hickman, K.E., Monahan, A., Scharcz, D.: ChatGPT goes to law school. SSRN. Minnesota Legal Stud. Res. (2023). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4335905
Dowling, M., Lucey, B.: ChatGPT for (finance) research: the Bananarama conjecture. Finance Res. Lett. 103662 (2023)
Kirmani, A.R.: Artificial intelligence-enabled science poetry. ACS Energy Lett. 8(1), 574–576 (2023)
Pavlik, J.V.: Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journal. Mass Commun. Educ. 78(1), 84–93 (2023)
Mhlanga, D.: Open AI In education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. SSRN (2023). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4354422
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., et al.: So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 71, 102642 (2023)
Jetzek, T., Avital, M., Bjorn-Andersen, N.: Data-driven innovation through open government data. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 9(2), 100–120 (2014)
Wirtz, B.W., Birkmeyer, S.: Open government: origin, development, and conceptual perspectives. Int. J. Public Adm. 38(5), 381–396 (2015)
Gao, Y., Janssen, M., Zhang, C.: Understanding the evolution of open government data research: towards open data sustainability and smartness. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. (2021, in press). https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211009955
Alexopoulos, C., Saxena, S., Janssen, M., Rizun, N. Whither the need and motivation for open government data (OGD) promotional strategies? Digit. Policy, Regul. Gov. (2023, in press). https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-07-2022-0078
Gasco-Hernandez, M., Martin, E.G., Reggi, L., Pyo, S., Luna-Reyes, L.F.: Promoting the use of open government data: cases of training and engagement. Gov. Inf. Q. 35(2), 233–242 (2018)
Moore, M.: Public value as the focus of strategy. Aust. J. Public Adm. 53(3), 296–303 (1994)
Pozzi, G., Pigni, F., Vitari, C.: Affordance theory in the IS discipline: a review and synthesis of the literature. In: Proceedings of Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Savannah, USA (2014)
Gao, Y., Janssen, M.: Generating value from government data using AI: an exploratory study. In: Viale Pereira, G., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2020. LNCS, vol. 12219, pp. 319–331. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_24
Alford, J., Hughes, O.: Public value pragmatism as the next phase of public management. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 38(2), 130–148 (2008)
Williams, I., Shearer, H.: Appraising public value: past, present and futures. Public Adm. 89(4), 1367–1384 (2011)
Cordella, A., Bonina, C.: A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: a theoretical reflection. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(4), 512–520 (2012)
Rose, J., Persson, J.S., Heeager, L.T., Irani, Z.: Managing e-government: value positions and relationships. Inf. Syst. J. 25(5), 531–571 (2015)
Toll, D., Lindgren, I., Melin, U., Madsen, C.: Values, benefits, considerations and risks of AI in government: a study of AI policy documents in Sweden. eJ. eDemocr. Open Gov. 12(1), 40–60
Chen, Y.C., Ahn, M., Wang, Y.-F.: Artificial intelligence and public values: value impacts and governance in the public sector. Sustainability 15, 4796 (2023)
Reyes, L.F.L., Chun, S.A.: Open government and public participation: issues and challenges in creating public value. Inf. Polity 17(2), 77–81 (2012)
Wiedenhoft, G.C., Matheus, R., Saxena, S., Alexopoulos, C.: Barriers towards open government data value co-creation: an empirical investigation. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries e12270 (2023, in press)
Ubaldi, B.: Open government data: towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, 22, OECD Publishing, Paris (2013). https://doi.org/10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en
Zeleti, F.A., Ojo, A., Curry, E.: Exploring the economic value of open government data. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(3), 535–551 (2016)
Harrison, T.M., et al.: Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective. In: 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, pp. 245–253 (2011)
McBride, K., Aavik, G., Toots, M., Kalvet, T., Krimmer, R.: How does open government data driven co-creation occur? Six factors and a ‘perfect storm’; insights from Chicago’s food inspection forecasting model. Gov. Inf. Q. 36(1), 88–97 (2019)
Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Auer, S.: Value creation on open government data. In: 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA, pp. 2605–2614 (2016)
Ruijer, E.H.J.M., Martinius, E.: Researching the democratic impact of open government data: a systematic literature review. Inf. Polity 1, 1–18 (2017)
Charalabidis, Y., Alexopoulos, C., Euripidis, L.: A taxonomy of open government data research areas and topics. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 26(1–2), 41–63 (2016)
Corrales-Garay, D., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., Mora-Valentín, E.M.: Knowledge areas, themes and future research on open data: a co-word analysis. Gov. Inf. Q. 36(1), 77–87 (2019)
Wirtz, B.W., Weyerer, J.C., Becker, M., Muller, W.M.: Open government data: a systematic literature review of empirical research. Electron. Mark. 32, 2381–2404 (2022)
Maylor, H., Blackmon, K., Huemann, M.: Researching Business and Management, 2nd edn. Palgrave – McMillan Education, UK (2017)
Chokki, A.P., Simonofski, A., Frenay, B., Vanderose, B.: Open government data awareness: eliciting citizens’ requirements for application design. Transform. Gov.: People Process Policy 16(4), 377–390 (2022)
Shadbolt, N., et al.: Linked open government data: lessons from Data.gov.uk. IEEE Intell. Syst. 27(3), 16–24 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Loukis, E., Saxena, S., Rizun, N., Maratsi, M.I., Ali, M., Alexopoulos, C. (2023). ChatGPT Application vis-a-vis Open Government Data (OGD): Capabilities, Public Values, Issues and a Research Agenda. In: Lindgren, I., et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14130. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41137-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41138-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)