Exploring the Automatic Selection of Aggregation Methods in Group Recommendation | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Exploring the Automatic Selection of Aggregation Methods in Group Recommendation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fuzzy Logic and Technology, and Aggregation Operators (EUSFLAT 2023, AGOP 2023)

Abstract

A recommender system is a software tool designed to support users to filter out useless options within a multitude of choices and provide them with the best possible ones. Group recommender systems have emerged as an important trend in recommendation since they recommend social items that are enjoyed by more than one individual, such as TV programs and travel packages, that are typically consumed in groups. Although algorithm selection in recommender systems is a research problem covered to some extent by the research community in which individuals’ information is aggregated, this contribution is focused on the automatic selection of the most appropriate aggregation function in group recommendation. Specifically, a general framework that identifies group characteristics to be matched with the most appropriate aggregation function is presented. This approach is implemented by using a fuzzy decision tree classifier, in a content-based group recommendation approach. The development of an experimental protocol illustrates the advantage of the new proposal in relation to its corresponding baselines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11210
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14013
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17(6), 734–749 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adomavicius, G., Zhang, J.: Impact of data characteristics on recommender systems performance. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. (TMIS) 3(1), 1–17 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cantador, I., Brusilovsky, P., Kuflik, T.: Second workshop on information heterogeneity and fusion in recommender systems (HetRec 2011). In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender systems, RecSys 2011, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castro, J., Yera, R., Martínez, L.: An empirical study of natural noise management in group recommendation systems. Decis. Support Syst. 94, 1–11 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, Z.S., Yang, L.L., Rodríguez, R.M., Xiong, S.H., Chin, K.S., Martínez, L.: Power-average-operator-based hybrid multiattribute online product recommendation model for consumer decision-making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 36(6), 2572–2617 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cunha, T., Soares, C., de Carvalho, A.C.: Metalearning and recommender systems: a literature review and empirical study on the algorithm selection problem for collaborative filtering. Inf. Sci. 423, 128–144 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dara, S., Chowdary, C.R., Kumar, C.: A survey on group recommender systems. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 54(2), 271–295 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Pessemier, T., Dooms, S., Martens, L.: Comparison of group recommendation algorithms. Multimed. Tools Appl. 72, 2497–2541 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffith, J., O’Riordan, C., Sorensen, H.: Investigations into user rating information and predictive accuracy in a collaborative filtering domain. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 937–942 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gunawardana, A., Shani, G.: A survey of accuracy evaluation metrics of recommendation tasks. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10, 2935–2962 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Harper, F.M., Konstan, J.A.: The Movielens datasets: history and context. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 5(4), 19:1-19:19 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, Z., Zeng, D.D.: Why does collaborative filtering work? transaction-based recommendation model validation and selection by analyzing bipartite random graphs. INFORMS J. Comput. 23(1), 138–152 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaššák, O., Kompan, M., Bieliková, M.: Personalized hybrid recommendation for group of users: top-n multimedia recommender. Inf. Process. Manage. 52(3), 459–477 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu, J., Wu, D., Mao, M., Wang, W., Zhang, G.: Recommender system application developments: a survey. Decis. Support Syst. 74, 12–32 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pedrycz, W.: Fuzzy Control and Fuzzy Systems. Research Studies Press Ltd. (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pérez-Almaguer, Y., Yera, R., Alzahrani, A.A., Martínez, L.: Content-based group recommender systems: a general taxonomy and further improvements. Expert Syst. Appl. 184, 115444 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Polatidis, N., Kapetanakis, S., Pimenidis, E.: Recommender systems algorithm selection using machine learning. In: Iliadis, L., Macintyre, J., Jayne, C., Pimenidis, E. (eds.) EANN 2021. PINNS, vol. 3, pp. 477–487. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80568-5_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B.: Recommender systems: introduction and challenges. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 1–34. Springer, Boston, MA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_1

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Umanol, M., et al.: Fuzzy decision trees by fuzzy ID3 algorithm and its application to diagnosis systems. In: Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 3rd International Fuzzy Systems Conference, pp. 2113–2118. IEEE (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yera, R., Alzahrani, A.A., Martinez, L.: Exploring post-hoc agnostic models for explainable cooking recipe recommendations. Knowl.-Based Syst. 251, 109216 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yera, R., Martinez, L.: Fuzzy tools in recommender systems: a survey. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 10(1), 776 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Research Project ProyExcel_00257, linked to the Andalucía Excellence Research Program. R.Yera is also supported by the Grants for the Re-qualification of the Spanish University System for 2021–2023 in the María Zambrano modality (UJAR10MZ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Martínez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yera, R., Rodríguez, R.M., Martínez, L. (2023). Exploring the Automatic Selection of Aggregation Methods in Group Recommendation. In: Massanet, S., Montes, S., Ruiz-Aguilera, D., González-Hidalgo, M. (eds) Fuzzy Logic and Technology, and Aggregation Operators. EUSFLAT AGOP 2023 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14069. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39965-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39965-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39964-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39965-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics