Sustainability Crossing the City: Developing a Sustainable Infrastructures System for Genoa Urban Center | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Sustainability Crossing the City: Developing a Sustainable Infrastructures System for Genoa Urban Center

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops (ICCSA 2023)

Abstract

Sustainable development of infrastructures is becoming more and more relevant within a European and International framework where effective connections are pivotal in terms of social and economic systems’ growth.

Nevertheless, as far as urban historical, dense and concentrated areas are concerned, intervention on urban infrastructures network could represent a very challenging task. In this sense, a quite iconic case may be represented by Genoa urban center. Here, the viaduct connecting the Eastern and the Western part of the city -Sopraelevata- proves to be outdated and not able to cope efficiently with con-temporary traffic flows and mobility needs. At the same time, it is perceived as a sort of urban landmark running along the former border between city and port areas, so that demolition is not welcomed by citizens; by the way, deep interventions would be needed to make it again an effective link suitable for vehicles connections.

The rationale of the Genoese project was to define a double system of sustainable infrastructures. The existing one (the Sopraelevata) was dedicated to pedestrian and bi-cycle mobility, thus creating a new panoramic view on the city and the seaside both for tourists and residents, while a new submarine tunnel crossing the gulf was to be built to support and ease vehicle flows passing city center.

Present work will focus on the methodological approach followed to define sustainability targets to be achieved in the project by the new infrastructural scheme, both for existing and new component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 12583
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 15729
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Raicu, S., Costescu, D., Popa, M., Dragu, V.: Dynamic intercorrelations between transport/traffic infrastructures and territorial systems: from economic growth to sustainable development. Sustainability 13(21), 11951 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Geurs, K.T., Van Wee, B.: Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. J. Transp. Geogr. 12(2), 127–140 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, J., Bertolini, L.: Measuring urban job accessibility with distance decay, competition and diversity. J. Transp. Geogr. 30, 100–109 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yan, X.: Toward accessibility-based planning. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 2021(87), 409–423 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2020.1850321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deboosere, R., El-Geneidy, A.M., Levinson, D.: Accessibility-oriented development. J. Transp. Geography 70, 11–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.015

  6. Shi, Y., Blainey, S., Sun, C., Jing, P.: A literature review on accessibility using bibliometric analysis techniques. J. Transp. Geogr. 87, 102810 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dobre, F., Pauna, V., Vasilescu, A.C., Buzoianu, O.A.C.: The impact of globalization on transport investment. In: SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 129, p. 11002, EDP Sciences (2021). https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112911002

  8. NextGenerationEU Homepage, https://next-generation-eu.europa.eu. Accessed 2023/03/09

  9. Dia, H.: Four strategies for reducing urban transport emissions and improving health: avoid, shift, share and improve. J. Transport Health 14, Supplement, 100683, ISSN 2214-1405 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100683

  10. Banister, D.: Cities, mobility and climate change. J. Transp. Geogr. 19(6), 1538–1546 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roberto, R., Zini, A., Felici, B., Rao, M., Noussan, M.: Potential benefits of remote working on urban mobility and related environmental impacts: results from a case study in Italy. Appl. Sci. 13(1), 607 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Allam, Z., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Chabaud, D., Moreno, C.: The 15-minute city offers a new framework for sustainability, liveability, and health. Lancet Planetary Health 6(3), e181–e183 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00014-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaglione, F., Gargiulo, C., Zucaro, F., Cottrill, C.: Urban accessibility in a 15-minute city: a measure in the city of Naples. Italy. Transportation Res. Procedia 60, 378–385 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrer-Ortiz, C., Marquet, O., Mojica, L., Vich, G.: Barcelona under the 15-minute city lens: Mapping the accessibility and proximity potential based on pedestrian travel times. Smart Cities, 5(1), 146–161 (2022). doi.https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5010010

  15. Malekpour, S., Brown, R.R., de Haan, F.J.: Strategic planning of urban infrastructure for environmental sustainability: Understanding the past to intervene for the future. Cities 46, 67–75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu, L., Ye, Q., Yuan, J., Hwang, B.G., Cheng, Y.: A scientometric analysis and overview of research on infrastructure externalities. Buildings 11(12), 630 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11120630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bröcker, J., Korzhenevych, A., Schürmann, C.: Assessing spatial equity and efficiency impacts of transport infrastructure projects. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodological 44(7), 795–811 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cavill, N., Kahlmeier, S., Rutter, H., Racioppi, F., Oja, P.: Economic analyses of transport infrastructure and policies including health effects related to cycling and walking: a systematic review. Transp. Policy 15(5), 291–304 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dobes, L., Leung, J.: Wider economic impacts in transport infrastructure cost-benefit analysis-A bridge too far?. Agenda: A J. Policy Anal. Reform 22(1), 75–95 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sierra, L.A., Yepes, V., Pellicer, E.: A review of multi-criteria assessment of the social sustainability of infrastructures. J. Clean. Prod. 187, 496–513 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thacker, S., et al.: Infrastructure for sustainable development. Nature Sustainability 2(4), 324–331 (2019). Doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0256-8

  22. Adshead, D., Thacker, S., Fuldauer, L.I., Hall, J.W.: Delivering on the sustainable development Goals through long-term infrastructure planning. Glob. Environ. Chang. 59, 101975 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leal Filho, W., et al.: An assessment of requirements investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the SDGs. Environ. Sci. Eur. 34(1), 1–17 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00629-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. López, E., Monzón, A.: Integration of sustainability issues in strategic transportation planning: a multi-criteria model for the assessment of transport infrastructure plans. Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastructure Eng. 25(6), 440–451 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00652.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zimmermann, R. K., Skjelmose, O., Jensen, K.G., Jensen, K.K., Birgisdottir, H.: Categorizing building certification systems according to the definition of sustainable building. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 471, No. 9, p. 092060. IOP Publishing (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092060

  26. Singh, R.K., Murty, H.R., Gupta, S.K., Dikshit, A.K.: An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol. Ind. 9(2), 189–212 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Giama, E., Papadopoulos, A.M.: Sustainable building management: overview of certification schemes and standards. Adv. Build. Energy Res. 6(2), 242–258 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/17512549.2012.740905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nguyen, B.K., Altan, H.: Comparative review of five sustainable rating systems. Procedia Eng. 21, 376–386 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bueno, P.C., Vassallo, J.M., Cheung, K.: Sustainability assessment of transport infrastructure projects: a review of existing tools and methods. Transp. Rev. 35(5), 622–649 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1041435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hainsch, K., et al.: Energy transition scenarios: what policies, societal attitudes, and technology developments will realize the EU Green Deal? Energy 239, 122067 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cardoso de Matos, A., Lourencetti, F.D.L.: Reusing railway infrastructures in the spirit of circular theory. A contribution to an operational concept (2021). https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2021.15487

  32. Hartley, K.: Infrastructure and SDG localization: the 21st century mandate. Environ. Res. Infrastructure Sustainability 2(1), 013001 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ac442a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kyrkou, D., Karthaus, R.: Urban sustainability standards: predetermined checklists or adaptable frameworks? Procedia Eng. 21, 204–211 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Antrop, M.: Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc. Urban Plan. 70(1–2), 21–34 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Amico, A. D., Currà, E.: The role of urban built heritage in qualify and quantify resilience. specific issues in Mediterranean City. Procedia Econ. Finance 18, 181–189 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00929-0

  36. European Union Publication Homepage. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/738d80bb-7d10-47bc-b131-ba8110e7c2d6. Accessed 2023/03/09

  37. Osmond, P., Wilkinson, S.: City planning and green infrastructure: embedding ecology into urban decision-making. Urban Planning https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0256-86(1), 1–4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3957

  38. Sturiale, L., Scuderi, A.: The role of green infrastructures in urban planning for climate change adaptation. Climate 7(10) (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7100119

  39. Wilk, B.: Guidelines for co-design-ing and co-implementing green infrastructure in urban regeneration processes Work package: 2 Dissemination level: PU Lead partner: ICLEI. www.proGIreg.eu, (2020)

  40. Hong, G., Tan, C., Qin, L., Wu, X.: Identification of priority areas for UGIoptimisation under carbon neutrality targets: Perspectives from China. Ecological Indicators 148, 110045 (2023). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110045

  41. Iungman, T., et al.: Cooling cities through urban green infrastructure: a health impact assessment of European cities. The Lancet 401(10376), 577–589 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02585-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Planas-Carbonell, A., Anguelovski, I., Oscilowicz, E., Pérez-del-Pulgar, C., Shokry, G.: From greening the climate-adaptive city to green climate gentrification? Civic perceptions of short-lived benefits and exclusionary protection in Boston, Philadelphia, Amsterdam and Barcelona. Urban Climate, 48 (September 2022), (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101295

  43. Francis, R., Bekera, B.: A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 121, 90–103 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Navarro, I.J., Yepes, V., Martí, J.V.: A review of multicriteria assessment techniques applied to sustainable infrastructure design. Adv. Civil Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6134803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bartesaghi Koc, C., Osmond, P., Peters, A.: Towards a comprehensive green infrastructure typology: a systematic review of approaches, methods and typologies. Urban Ecosystems 20(1), 15–35 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0578-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Escobedo, F.J., Giannico, V., Jim, C.Y., Sanesi, G., Lafortezza, R.: Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: nexus or evolving metaphors? Urban Forestry Urban Green. 37, 3–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Albert, C., Von Haaren, C.: Implications of applying the green infrastructure concept in landscape planning for ecosystem services in peri-urban areas: an expert survey and case study. Plann. Prac. Res. 32, 227–242 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2014.973683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang, J., Banzhaf, E.: Towards a better understanding of green infrastructure: a critical review. Ecol. Indic. 85, 758–772 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Austin, G.: Green Infrastructure for Landscape Planning: Integrating Human and Natural Systems. Routledge, New York, NY (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Davies, C., MacFarlane, R., McGloin, C., Roe, M.: Green Infrastructure Planning Guide. University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sturiale, L., Scuderi, A.: The evaluation of green investments in urban areas: A proposal of an eco-social-green model of the city. Sustainability (Switzerland) 10(12) (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124541

  52. Lamond, J., Everett, G.: Sustainable Blue-Green Infrastructure: A social practice approach to understanding community preferences and stewardship. Landscape Urban Plann. 191 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103639

  53. Matsler, A. M., Meerow, S., Mell, I., Pavao-Zuckerman, M.: A ’green’ chameleon: exploring the many disciplinary definitions, goals, and forms of green infrastructure. Landsc. Urban Plan. 214 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104145

  54. Morris, R.L., Konlechner, T.M., Ghisalberti, M., Swearer, S.E.: From grey to green: Efficacy of eco-engineering solutions for nature-based coastal defence. Glob. Change Biol. 24(5), 1827–1842 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ugolini, P., Pirlone, F., Spadaro, I., Candia, S.: Waterfront and sustainable mobility. The case study of Genoa. In Transport Infrastructure and Systems, 661–668 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315281896

  56. Delponte, I.: La Sopraelevata di Genova e le dimensioni di un’opera. Trasporti e cultura 35, 32–39 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Beltrametti, L., Bottasso, A., Conti, M., Ferrari, C., Piana, M.: Effetti della caduta del Ponte Morandi sull’economia. Rivista di economia e politica dei trasporti 1(2), 1–7 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Homepage Comune di Genova. http://www.urbancenter.comune.genova.it/node/557. Accessed 2023/03/19

  59. Alfieri, L., Timothy J. Nokes-Malach, T.J., Schunn, D.C.: Learning through case comparisons: a meta-analytic review, Educ. Psychol. 48(2), 87-113 (2013). doi.https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.775712

  60. Chakraborty, A., McMillan, A.: Scenario planning for urban planners: Toward a practitioner’s guide. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 81(1), 18–29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1038576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hopkins, L.D., Zapata, M.: Engaging the future: Forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Shipley, R., Hall, B., Feick, R., Earley, R.: Evaluating municipal visioning. Plan. Pract. Res. 19(2), 193–207 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/0269745042000284412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ratcliffe, J., Krawczyk, E.: Imagineering city futures: the use of prospective through scenarios in urban planning. Futures 43(7), 642–653 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentina Costa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Soraggi, D., Costa, V., Delponte, I. (2023). Sustainability Crossing the City: Developing a Sustainable Infrastructures System for Genoa Urban Center. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops. ICCSA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37126-4_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37126-4_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37125-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37126-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics