A Business Continuity Robustness Assessment Approach Through Disruption’s Sociological Indicators | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Business Continuity Robustness Assessment Approach Through Disruption’s Sociological Indicators

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction (ITDRR 2022)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 672))

  • 264 Accesses

Abstract

During the last years, International Organizations for Standardization have been developing many quality management tools which are being implemented by several types of organizations. These tools are especially being implemented to manage disasters and reduce activity disruptions’ consequences. However, monitoring the performance of the organizational norm requires developing metrics and assessment tools that can be used easily and on a daily basis to make organizations more resilient to crisis situations. The management tool that this research work considers is the “Business Continuity Plan” known as BCP. One way to assess this type of plan is to define, design then test quantifying and qualifying keys to measure its robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 12583
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 15729
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 15729
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhenmin, M.L.: World Economic Situation and Prospects (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Corrales-Estrada, A.M., Gómez-Santos, L.L., Bernal-Torres, C.A., Rodriguez-López, J.E.: sustainability and resilience organizational capabilities to enhance business continuity management: a literature review. Sustainability 13, 8196 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ISO 22300:2021(en), security and resilience — vocabulary. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:22300:ed-3:v1:en

  4. Anderies, J.M., Folke, C., Walker, B., Ostrom, E.: Aligning key concepts for global change policy: robustness, resilience, and sustainability. Ecol. Soc. 18(2) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. ISO 22313:2020(en), security and resilience—business continuity management systems—guidance on the use of ISO 22301. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:22313:ed-2:v1:en

  6. ISO 22301:2019(en), security and resilience—business continuity management systems—requirements. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:22301:ed-2:v1:en

  7. Lindström, J., Samuelsson, S., Hägerfors, A.: Business continuity planning methodology. Disaster Prev. Manage. Int. J. 19(2), 243–255 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561011038039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bazerman, M.H., Moore, D.A.: Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, 7th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Øien, K.: A framework for the establishment of organizational risk indicators. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 74(2), 147–167 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951-8320(01)00068-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clément, A., et al.: Robustesse, résilience : une brève synthèse des définitions au travers d’une analyse structurée de la littérature. Presented at the mosim’18 - 12ème conférence internationale de modélisation, optimisation et simulation, p. 8, June 2018

    Google Scholar 

  11. Webb, P.: Coping with drought and food insecurity in Ethiopia. Disasters 17(1), 33–47 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1993.tb00486.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Siegel, B., Jorgensen, L.: Vulnerability: a view from different disciplines. In: Social Protection Discussion Paper Series, vol. 115 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wybo, J.-l.: The role of simulation exercises in the assessment of robustness and resilience of private or public organizations. In: Pasman, H.J., Kirillov, I.A., (eds.) Resilience of Cities to Terrorist and Other Threats, pp. 491–507. Springer, Dordrecht (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8489-8_23

  14. Clément, A.: Proposition d’indicateurs de robustesse basés sur la prise en compte des risques afin d’évaluer les tournées de transport routier de marchandises. These de doctorat, ecole nationale des mines d’albi-carmaux (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Negrini, S., et al.: Up to 2.2 million people experiencing disability suffer collateral damage each day of Covid-19 lockdown in Europe. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 56(3), 361–365 (2020). https://doi.org/10.23736/s1973-9087.20.06361-3

  16. Breton, D.: Anne vega, une ethnologue à l’hôpital. L’ambiguïté du quotidien infirmier. Paris, éditions des archives contemporaines, 2000, 213 p., réf., 25(2), 179–180, (2001). https://doi.org/10.7202/000246ar

  17. Lund, K.A., Benediktsson, K.: Inhabiting a risky earth: the eyjafjallajökull eruption in 2010 and its impacts (respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate). Anthropol. Today 27(1), 6–9 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8322.2011.00781.x

  18. Pearson, C.M., Mitroff, I.I.: From crisis prone to crisis prepared: a framework for crisis management. 7(1), 48–59 (1993). https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1993.9409142058

  19. Buchet-Molfessis, C.: glissements de tâches de l’infirmier vers l’aide-soignant: le lien entre la formation initiale et le positionnement des nouveaux diplômes. recherche en soins infirmiers 92(1), 68–94 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.092.0068

  20. Michaud, S.: les glissements de tâches des infirmiers vers les aides-soignants: quelle stratégie le directeur des soins peut-il adopter? (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sainsaulieu, I.: le malaise des soignants: le travail sous pression à l’hôpital. le malaise des soignants, pp. 1–238 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. De Barros, F.: Anne-marie arborio, un personnel invisible. Les aides-soignantes à l’hôpital, paris, anthropos-economica, coll. Sociologiques, 2001, rééd. 2012, 334 p. Corps 14(1), 177–180 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3917/corp1.014.0177

  23. Fayyad, S., Al-Rawashdeh, M.O.: Factors affect slipping of automobiles. WSEAS Trans. Syst. Control 15, June 2020. https://doi.org/10.37394/23203.2020.15.26

  24. Caffyn, S.: Development of a continuous improvement self-assessment tool. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 19(11), 1138–1153 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910291050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Girgin, S., Krausmann, E.: RAPID-N: Rapid natech risk assessment and mapping framework. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26(6), 949–960 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2013.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bouza, A., Reif, G., Bernstein, A., Gall, H.: SemTree: ontology-based decision tree algorithm for recommender systems (2008). https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-5392

  27. Daniel L. Costa, M.L.C., Samuel J. Perl, M.J.A., George J. Silowash, D.L.S.: An ontology for insider threat indicators--development and applications. Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh Pa Software Engineering Inst (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre Génie Industriel, IMT Mines Albi, University of Toulouse, Campus Jarlard, Route De Teillet, Albi, France

    Oussema Ben Amara, Daouda Kamissoko & Frederick Benaben

  2. CERTOP Laboratory, INU Champollion, University of Toulouse, Place de Verdun, Albi, France

    Ygal Fijalkow

Authors
  1. Oussema Ben Amara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daouda Kamissoko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ygal Fijalkow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Frederick Benaben
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Oussema Ben Amara , Daouda Kamissoko , Ygal Fijalkow or Frederick Benaben .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway

    Terje Gjøsæter

  2. University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway

    Jaziar Radianti

  3. Tsuda University, Tokyo, Japan

    Yuko Murayama

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ben Amara, O., Kamissoko, D., Fijalkow, Y., Benaben, F. (2023). A Business Continuity Robustness Assessment Approach Through Disruption’s Sociological Indicators. In: Gjøsæter, T., Radianti, J., Murayama, Y. (eds) Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction. ITDRR 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 672. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34207-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34207-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34206-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34207-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships

Search

Navigation