Influence of Expertise Complementarity on Ad Hoc Human-Agent Team Effectiveness | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Influence of Expertise Complementarity on Ad Hoc Human-Agent Team Effectiveness

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRIMA 2022: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13753))

  • 927 Accesses

Abstract

As autonomous agents become more capable and widely deployed, teams of human and agent members will be seen more frequently. Ad hoc human-agent teams, formed with team members without prior experience with current teammates and deployed only for a limited number of interactions, will find diverse applications in dynamic environments. We focuses on ad-hoc team scenarios pairing human with agent where both need to assess and adapt to the capabilities and expertise of partner to maximize team performance. We investigate influence of different agent expertise distributions on effectiveness of such ad-hoc teams. We designed, implemented, and experimented with an environment in which human-agent teams repeatedly collaborate to complete heterogeneous task sets where agent and human expertise vary over different task types. Several hypotheses about effect of complementarity of team members on team performance and human satisfaction are evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Agent expertise is simulated by flipping a coin with success probability of \(P_t\).

References

  1. Brinkman, W.P.: Design of a questionnaire instrument. In: Handbook of Mobile Technology Research Methods, pp. 31–57. Nova Publishers (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Genter, K., Agmon, N., Stone, P.: Role-based ad hoc teamwork. In: Proceedings of the Plan, Activity, and Intent Recognition Workshop at the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Artificial Intelligence (PAIR-11) , August 2011

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gervits, F., Thurston, D., Thielstrom, R., Fong, T., Pham, Q., Scheutz, M.: Toward genuine robot teammates: improving human-robot team performance using robot shared mental models. In: AAMAS, pp. 429–437 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gladstein, D.L.: Groups in context: a model of task group effectiveness. Adm. Sci. Q. 29, 499–517 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Green, S.G., Taber, T.D.: The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 25(1) (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hafızoğlu, F.M., Sen, S.: The effects of past experience on trust in repeated human-agent teamwork. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 514–522 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lai, V., Tan, C.: On human predictions with explanations and predictions of machine learning models: a case study on deception detection. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 29–38 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Larson, L., DeChurch, L.A.: Leading teams in the digital age: four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams. Leadersh. Q. 31(1), 101377 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mathieu, J.E., Hollenbeck, J.R., van Knippenberg, D., Ilgen, D.R.: A century of work teams in the journal of applied psychology. J. Appl. Psychol. 102(3), 452 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mosteo, A.R., Montano, L.: A survey of multi-robot task allocation. Instituto de Investigacin en Ingenierła de Aragn (I3A), Tech. Rep (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Puranam, P., Alexy, O., Reitzig, M.: What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad. Manag. Rev. 39(2), 162–180 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reinig, B.A.: Toward an understanding of satisfaction with the process and outcomes of teamwork. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 65–83 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shoham, Y., Leyton-Brown, K.: Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami Abuhaimed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abuhaimed, S., Sen, S. (2023). Influence of Expertise Complementarity on Ad Hoc Human-Agent Team Effectiveness. In: Aydoğan, R., Criado, N., Lang, J., Sanchez-Anguix, V., Serramia, M. (eds) PRIMA 2022: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13753. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21203-1_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21203-1_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21202-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21203-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics