AdaBest: Minimizing Client Drift in Federated Learning via Adaptive Bias Estimation | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

AdaBest: Minimizing Client Drift in Federated Learning via Adaptive Bias Estimation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Vision – ECCV 2022 (ECCV 2022)

Abstract

In Federated Learning (FL), a number of clients or devices collaborate to train a model without sharing their data. Models are optimized locally at each client and further communicated to a central hub for aggregation. While FL is an appealing decentralized training paradigm, heterogeneity among data from different clients can cause the local optimization to drift away from the global objective. In order to estimate and therefore remove this drift, variance reduction techniques have been incorporated into FL optimization recently. However, these approaches inaccurately estimate the clients’ drift and ultimately fail to remove it properly. In this work, we propose an adaptive algorithm that accurately estimates drift across clients. In comparison to previous works, our approach necessitates less storage and communication bandwidth, as well as lower compute costs. Additionally, our proposed methodology induces stability by constraining the norm of estimates for client drift, making it more practical for large scale FL. Experimental findings demonstrate that the proposed algorithm converges significantly faster and achieves higher accuracy than the baselines across various FL benchmarks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 12583
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 15729
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Oracle dataset refers to the hypothetical dataset formed by stacking all clients’ data. Oracle gradients are the full-batch gradients of the Oracle dataset.

  2. 2.

    In contrast to cross-silo FL, cross-device FL is referred to a large-scale (in terms of number of clients) setting in which clients are devices such as smart-phones.

  3. 3.

    Recall that Federated Learning is a sub-branch of distributed learning with specific characteristics geared towards practicality [17].

  4. 4.

    FedDyn additionally compares with FedProx [13]; however, as shown in their benchmarks it performs closer to FedAvg than the other baselines.

References

  1. Acar, D.A.E., Zhao, Y., Matas, R., Mattina, M., Whatmough, P., Saligrama, V.: Federated learning based on dynamic regularization. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ajalloeian, A., Stich, S.U.: On the convergence of SGD with biased gradients. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.00051 (2020)

  3. Harikandeh, R.B., Ahmed, M.O., Virani, A., Schmidt, M., Konečnỳ, J., Sallinen, S.: Stopwasting my gradients: practical svrg. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 28 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bi, J., Gunn, S.R.: A variance controlled stochastic method with biased estimation for faster non-convex optimization. In: Oliver, N., Pérez-Cruz, F., Kramer, S., Read, J., Lozano, J.A. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12977, pp. 135–150. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86523-8_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsu, T.M.H., Qi, H., Brown, M.: Measuring the effects of non-identical data distribution for federated visual classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.06335 (2019)

  6. Johnson, R., Zhang, T.: Accelerating stochastic gradient descent using predictive variance reduction. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 26, 315–323 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karimireddy, S.P., Kale, S., Mohri, M., Reddi, S., Stich, S., Suresh, A.T.: SCAFFOLD: stochastic controlled averaging for federated learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 5132–5143. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Konečnỳ, J., Liu, J., Richtárik, P., Takáč, M.: Mini-batch semi-stochastic gradient descent in the proximal setting. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 10(2), 242–255 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Konečnỳ, J., McMahan, H.B., Ramage, D., Richtárik, P.: Federated optimization: distributed machine learning for on-device intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02527 (2016)

  10. Krizhevsky, A., Hinton, G., et al.: Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. University of Toronto, Technical report (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., Haffner, P.: Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86(11), 2278–2324 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, D., Wang, J.: FedMD: heterogenous federated learning via model distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03581 (2019)

  13. Li, T., Sahu, A.K., Zaheer, M., Sanjabi, M., Talwalkar, A., Smith, V.: Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks. Proc. Mach. Learn. Syst. 2, 429–450 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, T., Sahu, A.K., Zaheer, M., Sanjabi, M., Talwalkar, A., Smithy, V.: FedDANE: a federated newton-type method. In: 2019 53rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, pp. 1227–1231. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liang, X., Shen, S., Liu, J., Pan, Z., Chen, E., Cheng, Y.: Variance reduced local SGD with lower communication complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.12844 (2019)

  16. Lin, T., Kong, L., Stich, S.U., Jaggi, M.: Ensemble distillation for robust model fusion in federated learning. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 2351–2363 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., Arcas, B.A.: Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 1273–1282. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murata, T., Suzuki, T.: Bias-variance reduced local SGD for less heterogeneous federated learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 7872–7881. PMLR (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen, L.M., Liu, J., Scheinberg, K., Takáč, M.: SARAH: a novel method for machine learning problems using stochastic recursive gradient. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2613–2621. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pathak, R., Wainwright, M.J.: FedSplit: an algorithmic framework for fast federated optimization. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 7057–7066 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reddi, S.J., Konečnỳ, J., Richtárik, P., Póczós, B., Smola, A.: AIDE: fast and communication efficient distributed optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.06879 (2016)

  22. Roux, N., Schmidt, M., Bach, F.: A stochastic gradient method with an exponential convergence _rate for finite training sets. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 25 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shalev-Shwartz, S., Zhang, T.: Stochastic dual coordinate ascent methods for regularized loss minimization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 14(2) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shamir, O., Srebro, N., Zhang, T.: Communication-efficient distributed optimization using an approximate newton-type method. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1000–1008. PMLR (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stich, S.U.: Local SGD converges fast and communicates little. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, J., Liu, Q., Liang, H., Joshi, G., Poor, H.V.: Tackling the objective inconsistency problem in heterogeneous federated optimization. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 7611–7623 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, J., Tantia, V., Ballas, N., Rabbat, M.: SlowMo: improving communication-efficient distributed SGD with slow momentum. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.00643 (2019)

  28. Xiao, L., Zhang, T.: A proximal stochastic gradient method with progressive variance reduction. SIAM J. Optim. 24(4), 2057–2075 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu, H., Jin, R., Yang, S.: On the linear speedup analysis of communication efficient momentum SGD for distributed non-convex optimization. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 7184–7193. PMLR (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, X., Hong, M., Dhople, S., Yin, W., Liu, Y.: FedPD: a federated learning framework with optimal rates and adaptivity to Non-IID data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.11418 (2020)

  31. Zhao, Y., Li, M., Lai, L., Suda, N., Civin, D., Chandra, V.: Federated learning with Non-IID data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.00582 (2018)

  32. Zhu, L., Han, S.: Deep leakage from gradients. In: Federated Learning, pp. 17–31. Springer (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu, Z., Hong, J., Zhou, J.: Data-free knowledge distillation for heterogeneous federated learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 12878–12889. PMLR (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author wishes to express gratitude for the financial support provided by MITACS and Research Nova Scotia. In addition, the fifth author acknowledges Natural Sciences and Engineering research Council of Canada, CHIST-ERA grant CHIST-ERA-19-XAI-0 and the Polish NCN Agency NCN(grant No. 2020/02/Y/ST6/00064). We are grateful to Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, the first author of [7], for enlightening us on the proper implementation of SCAFFOLD. William Taylor-Melanson is also acknowledged for reviewing this paper and providing numerous helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farshid Varno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 770 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Varno, F., Saghayi, M., Rafiee Sevyeri, L., Gupta, S., Matwin, S., Havaei, M. (2022). AdaBest: Minimizing Client Drift in Federated Learning via Adaptive Bias Estimation. In: Avidan, S., Brostow, G., Cissé, M., Farinella, G.M., Hassner, T. (eds) Computer Vision – ECCV 2022. ECCV 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13683. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20050-2_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20050-2_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20049-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20050-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics