AbstractWe explore the intersection
We explore the intersection of human-centered engineering design methodologies, applied learning sciences, and data (instrumentation & analytics) realized in the practice of learning engineering in response to an emerging intelligence augmentation economy. As the nature of human endeavor and productivity changes with the advancement of HCI and AI technologies we predict an “intelligence augmentation economy” will replace the knowledge economy. Just like the industrial economy and service economies before it, the IA economy will fundamentally change the nature of work and what people need to learn to be its contributors and beneficiaries.
The demands of secondary and postsecondary education have already begun to shift from pre-career and preparation for life to mid-career adaptation, enrichment, and retraining [1]. The intelligence augmentation economy will require development of new skills for new kinds of collaborative work with intelligent agents. The lines between learning and working will blur, just as will the lines between the work of humans and the work of machines. Education institutions will be one source for life-long-learning in a world where work-embedded continuous adaptive learning is the norm.
The learning engineering process provides a methodology for educational institutions and work-embedded training partners to engineer new kinds of learning experiences suited to the needs of the intelligence augmentation economy. These new learning experiences will take full advantage of technologies such as augmented reality and intelligent agents.
We draw ideas from several chapters of the Learning Engineering Toolkit: Evidence-Based Practices from the Learning Sciences, Instructional Design, and Beyond [2]. We suggest a path to scaling HCI innovation through application of the learning engineering process to support a radically new future of learning and working in a new intelligence augmentation economy characterized by productivity gains through collaboration between people and intelligent agents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CLASP: Table depiction of ‘Yesterday’s Non-Traditional Student is Today’s Traditional Student’. Center for Postsecondary and Economic Success (2015). http://www.clasp.org/resources-and-publications/publication-1/CPES-Nontraditional-students-pdf.pdf
Goodell, J., et al.: Learning Engineering Toolkit: Evidence-Based Practices from the Learning Sciences, Instructional Design, and Beyond. Routledge, London (2022, in press)
Toppo, G., Tracy, J.: Running with Robots: The American High School’s Third Century. MIT Press, Cambridge (2021)
Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T., Perfetti, C.: The knowledge-learning-instruction framework: bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cogn. Sci. 36(5), 757–798 (2012)
Thai, K.-P., Craig, S.D., Goodell, J., Lis, J., Schoenherr, J.R., Kolodner, J.: Learning engineering is human-centered. In: Goodell, J. (ed.) Learning Engineering Toolkit, p. 85 (2022)
Kessler, A., Craig, S.D., Goodell, J., Kurzweil, D., Greenwald, S.W.: Learning engineering is a process. In: Goodell, J. (ed.) The Learning Engineering Toolkit: Evidence-Based Practices from the Learning Sciences, Instructional Design, and Beyond, pp. 29–46. Routledge, London (2022)
Czerwinski, E., Goodell, J., Ritter, S., Sottilare, R., Thai, K.P., Jacobs, D.: Learning Engineering Uses Data (Part 1): Instrumentation. In: Goodell, J. (ed.) The Learning Engineering Toolkit: Evidence-Based Practices from the Learning Sciences, Instructional Design, and Beyond, pp. 153–174. Routledge, London (2022)
Barrett, M., et al.: Learning engineering uses data (part 2): analytics. In: Goodell, J. (ed.) The Learning Engineering Toolkit: Evidence-Based Practices from the Learning Sciences, Instructional Design, and Beyond, pp. 175–200. Routledge, London (2022)
Murphy, R., Roschelle, J., Feng, M., Mason, C.: Investigating efficacy, moderators and mediators for an online mathematics homework intervention. J. Res. Educ. Effect. 13(2) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1710885
Sottilare, R.A., Shawn Burke, C., Salas, E., Sinatra, A.M., Johnston, J.H., Gilbert, S.B.: Designing adaptive instruction for teams: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 28(2), 225–264 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0146-z
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Goodell, J., Heffernan, N. (2022). Human-Centered Learning Engineering for the Emerging Intelligence Augmentation Economy. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1655. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19682-9_78
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19682-9_78
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19681-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19682-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)