Measure of Information Content of Basic Belief Assignments | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Measure of Information Content of Basic Belief Assignments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Belief Functions: Theory and Applications (BELIEF 2022)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a measure of Information Content (IC) of Basic Belief Assignments (BBAs), and we show how it can be easily calculated. This new IC measure is interpreted as the dual of the effective measure of uncertainty (i.e. generalized entropy) of BBAs developed recently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    However, we will keep \(m^\varTheta (\cdot )\) notation when very necessary.

  2. 2.

    \(\triangleq \) means equal by definition.

  3. 3.

    This terminology is not used by Shannon in his original paper but it has been introduced by Tribus in [10] in the probabilistic context, and by analogy we adopt Tribus’ terminology also for BBAs.

  4. 4.

    Once the binary values are converted into their digit value with the most significant bit on the left (i.e. the least significant bit on the right).

  5. 5.

    aside of the value of N of course.

  6. 6.

    That is why it is better, we think, to use the notation \(IC(m^\varTheta )\) instead of IC(m).

  7. 7.

    We suppose for convenience that the elements \(X \in 2^\varTheta \) are listed in increasing order using the classical \(|\varTheta |\)-bits representation with the least significant bit on the right.

  8. 8.

    Similarly, we can define \(\varDelta _{IC}(m_1|m_2)\triangleq IC(m_1^\varTheta )-IC(m_2^\varTheta )=-\varDelta _{IC}(m_2|m_1)\).

References

  1. Bovee, M., Srivastava, R.S.: A conceptual framework and belief-function approach to assessing overall information quality. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 18(1), 51–74 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Floridi, L., Illari, P. (eds.): The Philosophy of Information Quality. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Batini, C., Scannapieco, M.: Data and Information Quality: Dimensions, Principles and Techniques. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Kenett, R.S., Shmueli, G.: Information Quality. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bossé, E., Rogova, G.L. (eds.): Information Quality in Information Fusion and Decision Making, Information Fusion and Data Science. Springer Nature, Switzerland (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bouhamed, S.A., Kalle, I.K., Yager, R.R., Bossé, E., Solaiman, B.: An intelligent quality-based approach to fusing multi-source possibilistic information. Inf. Fusion 55, 68–90 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dezert, J.: An effective measure of uncertainty of basic belief assignments, fusion. In: 2022 International Conference, Linköping, Sweden, pp. 1–10 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Dezert, J., Tchamova A.: On effectiveness of measures of uncertainty of basic belief assignments. Inf. Secur. J.: Int. J. (ISIJ)52, 9–36 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tribus, M.: Rational Descriptions, Decisions and Designs. Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 26–28 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bradley, R.E., Petrilli, S.J., Sandifer, C.E.: L’Hôpital’s analyse des infiniments petits (An annoted translation with source material by Johann Bernoulli), Birkhäuser, p. 311 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423 & 623–656 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klir, G.J.: Principles of uncertainty: what are they? why do we need them? Fuzzy Sets Syst. 74, 15–31 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Dezert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dezert, J., Tchamova, A., Han, D. (2022). Measure of Information Content of Basic Belief Assignments. In: Le Hégarat-Mascle, S., Bloch, I., Aldea, E. (eds) Belief Functions: Theory and Applications. BELIEF 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13506. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17801-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17801-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17800-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17801-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics