Abstract
The accumulation of the design knowledge (DK) resulting from Design Science Research (DSR) requires other DSR researchers to appropriate, use, evaluate, modify, and/or extend prior DSR artifacts. Unfortunately, much DK (especially software artifacts) is never appropriated by other researchers for further DSR activity. The lack of take-up of DSR outcomes by other researchers represents a significant waste of resources, reduces the contribution of a DSR project and, most significantly, is a major barrier to the accumulation of DSR knowledge. We believe this problem is mainly a social one. DK appropriation is a decision supported by a communication effort, which suggests relevance of Diffusion of Innovation (DoI) theory. While journals and repositories can make quality DK and IT artifacts find-able and available for reuse, supplementary and alternative communication channels may better enable and encourage DK appropriation decisions and thereby, DK accumulation longitudinally over multiple DSR projects. Based on this perspective, this paper explores a peer-to-peer decentralized communication pattern for DK dissemination and appropriation for further DSR projects and DK accumulation. Specifically, we propose (1) a model of DK accumulation as a DoI process (2) two new ‘communication channels’ (i.e., Appropriation Sessions and Marketplaces), and (3) questions (based on UTAUT) to (self-)assess the likelihood of new DK appropriation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baskerville, R.L., Pries-Heje, J.: Projectability in design science research. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. (JITTA), 20(1), 3 (2019). https://aisel.aisnet.org/jitta/vol20/iss1/3
Burton-Jones, A., Boh, W.F., Oborn, E., Padmanabhan, B.: Editor’s comments: advancing research transparency at mis quarterly: a pluralistic approach. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 45(2), iii-xviii (2021)
Crowston, K., Wei, K., Howison, J., Wiggins, A.: Free/libre open-source software development: what we know and what we do not know. ACM Comput. Surv. 44(2), 71–735 (2012)
Doyle, C., Luczak-Roesch, M., Mittal, A.: We need the open artefact: design science as a pathway to open science in information systems research. In: Tulu, B., Djamasbi, S., Leroy, G. (eds.) DESRIST 2019. LNCS, vol. 11491, pp. 46–60. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19504-5_4
Doyle, C., Luczak-Rösch, M.: This paper is an artefact: on open science practices in design science research using registered reports. In: 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2020, Maui, Hawaii, 7–10 January 2020, pp. 1–10. ScholarSpace (2020). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.619
Fichman, R., Kemerer, C.: Object technology and reuse: lessons from early adopters. Computer 30(10), 47–59 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/2.625304
Fitzgerald, B.: The transformation of open source software. MIS Q. 30(3), 587–598 (2006). http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148740
Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8, 312–335 (2007). http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol8/iss5/1
Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J.: Research perspectives: design theory indeterminacy: what is it, how can it be reduced, and why did the polar bear drown?. J. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 21(5), 1 (2020)
Meth, H., Mueller, B., Maedche, A.: Designing a requirement mining system. J. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 16(9), 2 (2015)
Morisio, M., Ezran, M., Tully, C.: Success and failure factors in software reuse. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(4), 340–357 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2002.995420
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inform. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)
Reining, S., Ahlemann, F., Mueller, B., Thakurta, R.: Knowledge accumulation in design science research: ways to foster scientific progress. SIGMIS Database 53(1), 10–24 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3514097.3514100
Rogers, E.M., Singhal, A., Quinlan, M.M.: Diffusion of innovations. In: Stacks, D.W., Salwen, M.B., Eichhorn, K.C. (eds.) An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research, 3rd edn. Routledge (2019)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Vom Brocke, J., Winter, R., Hevner, A., Maedche, A.: Special issue editorial-accumulation and evolution of design knowledge in design science research: a journey through time and space. J. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 21(3), 9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00611
Walls, J.G., Widermeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Assessing information system design theory in perspective: how useful was our 1992 initial rendition?. J. Inform. Technol. Theory Appl. (JITTA), 6(2), 43–58 (2004). https://aisel.aisnet.org/jitta/vol6/iss2/6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Díaz, O., Venable, J.R., Garmendia, X. (2022). Are Journals and Repositories Enough? Design Knowledge Accumulation as a Diffusion of Innovation Practice. In: Drechsler, A., Gerber, A., Hevner, A. (eds) The Transdisciplinary Reach of Design Science Research. DESRIST 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13229. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06516-3_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06516-3_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06515-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06516-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)