How Could We Have Known? Anticipating Sustainability Effects of a Software Product | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

How Could We Have Known? Anticipating Sustainability Effects of a Software Product

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Business (ICSOB 2021)

Abstract

Companies are required to think of ways to address their sustainability responsibilities and impacts. Although they commonly present some of their activities and impacts at a high-level of abstraction in their sustainability strategies, the impacts of their products and services may remain unclear in such reporting. This is partly due to the lack of suitable tools to increase their awareness regarding the potential effects of these products and services on different sustainability dimensions. Using a case study, this paper shows how the Sustainability Awareness Framework (SusAF) can be applied to identify such potential effects of an IT company’s (software) product and how such identified effects could be linked to the company focus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 7435
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 9294
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://zenodo.org/record/3676514#.XsTgKy-ZPGI.

References

  1. Annandale, D., et al.: Asian Environment Outlook 2005: Making Profits, Protecting Our Planet: Corporate Responsibility for Environmental Performance in Asia and the Pacific. Asian Development Bank, December 2005

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, C., et al.: Sustainability design and software: the Karlskrona manifesto. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 467–476. IEEE Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker, C., et al.: Requirements: the key to sustainability. IEEE Softw. 33(1), 56–65 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brundtland, G.: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. United Nations General Assembly Document A/42/427 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chitchyan, R., et al.: Sustainability design in requirements engineering: state of practice. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, pp. 533–542. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duboc, L., et al.: Do we really know what we are building? Raising awareness of potential sustainability effects of software systems in requirements engineering. In: 27th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 3–12 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elkington, J.: Partnerships from cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ. Qual. Manag. 8(1), 37–51 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fontaine, M.: Corporate social responsibility and sustainability: the new bottom line? Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 4(4) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goodland, R.: Sustainability: human, social, economic and environmental. Soc. Sci. 6, 220–225 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B.: ICT for sustainability: an emerging research field. In: Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B. (eds.) ICT Innovations for Sustainability. AISC, vol. 310, pp. 3–36. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Low, M.: Corporate social responsibility and the evolution of internal corporate social responsibility in 21st century. Asian J. Soc. Sci. Manag. Stud. 3(1), 56–74 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. NASA: Is it too late to prevent climate change? https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/16/is-it-too-late-to-prevent-climate-change/. Accessed 14 July 2020

  13. Penzenstadler, B.: Infusing green: requirements engineering for green in and through software systems. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1216, pp. 44–53 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tsalis, T.A., et al.: New challenges for corporate sustainability reporting: united Nations’ 2030 Agenda for sustainable development and the sustainable development goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Wiley Online Library (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Venters, C.C., et al.: Characterising sustainability requirements: a new species red herring or just an odd fish? In: 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society Track, pp. 3–12 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jari Porras .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Porras, J. et al. (2021). How Could We Have Known? Anticipating Sustainability Effects of a Software Product. In: Wang, X., Martini, A., Nguyen-Duc, A., Stray, V. (eds) Software Business. ICSOB 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 434. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91983-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91983-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91982-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91983-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics