A Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnosing Multiple Myeloma | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

A Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnosing Multiple Myeloma

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ICAISC 2021)

Abstract

Multiple myeloma is a type of bone marrow cancer. Patient’s blood samples are analysed from protein gel strips and densitometer graphs which are then interpreted by a pathologist to diagnose multiple myeloma. This manual process of diagnosis is slow which is problematic as patients need to be diagnosed as soon as possible in order to prevent the condition from worsening, hence the need to automate this process. Given the success of machine learning in diagnosing diseases from images, this study investigates the use of machine learning approaches for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. This is the first study investigating the automation of this process and hence presents a novel application of machine learning. The study compares machine learning approaches, artificial neural networks, convolutional neural networks, random forests and support vector machines, for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma from gel strips and densitometer graphs. The study has revealed that convolutional neural networks, specifically VGG16, is the most suitable approach for the detection of multiple myeloma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 13727
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al Zorgani, M., Ugail, H.: Comparative study of image classification using machine learning algorithms. Technical report (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharyya, S., Epstein, J., Suva, L.J.: Biomarkers that discriminate multiple myeloma patients with or without skeletal involvement detected using SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry and statistical and machine learning tools. Dis. Markers 22(4), 245–255 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1026–1034 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kingma, D., Adam, B.J.: A method for stochastic optimization. arxiv [cs. lg]. 2014 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lund, A., Lund, M.: Kruskal-Wallis H test using SPSS statistics (2018). https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/kruskal-wallis-h-test-using-spss-statistics.php (2018)

  6. Lund, A., Lund, M.: One-way anova (2018). https://statistics.laerd.com/ statistical-guides/one-way-anova-statistical-guide.php (2018)

  7. Santo, L., Vallet, S., Raje, N.: Multiple myeloma. BMJ best practice. https://bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-us/179 (2018)

  8. Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014)

  9. Sopharak, A., Uyyanonvara, B., Barman, S.: Comparing SVM and Naive Bayes classifier for automatic microaneurysm detections. Int. J. Comput. Electr. Autom. Control Inf. Eng. 8(5), 797–800 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Turki, T., Wei, Z., Wang, J.T.: Transfer learning approaches to improve drug sensitivity prediction in multiple myeloma patients. IEEE Access 5, 7381–7393 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ullah, R., Khan, S., Ali, H., Chaudhary, I.I., Bilal, M., Ahmad, I.: A comparative study of machine learning classifiers for risk prediction of asthma disease. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 28, 292–296 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Waddell, M., Page, D., Shaughnessy Jr, J.: Predicting cancer susceptibility from single-nucleotide polymorphism data: a case study in multiple myeloma. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Bioinformatics, pp. 21–28 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, H., Zhou, Z., Li, Y., Chen, Z., Lu, P., Wang, W., Liu, W., Yu, L.: Comparison of machine learning methods for classifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer from 18 F-FDG PET/CT images. EJNMMI Res. 7(1), 1–11 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, C.C., Yeh, W.C., Hsu, W.D., Islam, M.M., Nguyen, P.A.A., Poly, T.N., Wang, Y.C., Yang, H.C., Li, Y.C.J.: Prediction of fatty liver disease using machine learning algorithms. Comput. Meth. Prog. Biomed. 170, 23–29 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, L., et al.: Automated whole-body bone lesion detection for multiple myeloma on 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT imaging using deep learning methods. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2018, 2391925 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yadav, S.S., Jadhav, S.M.: Deep convolutional neural network based medical image classification for disease diagnosis. J. Big Data 6(1), 1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0276-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is based on the research supported wholly/in part by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant Numbers 46712). Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. The authors also acknowledge the Sebia Group Cartridge for sponsoring the printing of the gel strips and graphs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nelishia Pillay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Marimuthu, L., Pillay, N., Punchoo, R., Bhoora, S. (2021). A Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnosing Multiple Myeloma. In: Rutkowski, L., Scherer, R., Korytkowski, M., Pedrycz, W., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zurada, J.M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. ICAISC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12855. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87897-9_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87897-9_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87896-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87897-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics