Abstract
Multiple myeloma is a type of bone marrow cancer. Patient’s blood samples are analysed from protein gel strips and densitometer graphs which are then interpreted by a pathologist to diagnose multiple myeloma. This manual process of diagnosis is slow which is problematic as patients need to be diagnosed as soon as possible in order to prevent the condition from worsening, hence the need to automate this process. Given the success of machine learning in diagnosing diseases from images, this study investigates the use of machine learning approaches for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. This is the first study investigating the automation of this process and hence presents a novel application of machine learning. The study compares machine learning approaches, artificial neural networks, convolutional neural networks, random forests and support vector machines, for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma from gel strips and densitometer graphs. The study has revealed that convolutional neural networks, specifically VGG16, is the most suitable approach for the detection of multiple myeloma.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al Zorgani, M., Ugail, H.: Comparative study of image classification using machine learning algorithms. Technical report (2018)
Bhattacharyya, S., Epstein, J., Suva, L.J.: Biomarkers that discriminate multiple myeloma patients with or without skeletal involvement detected using SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry and statistical and machine learning tools. Dis. Markers 22(4), 245–255 (2006)
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1026–1034 (2015)
Kingma, D., Adam, B.J.: A method for stochastic optimization. arxiv [cs. lg]. 2014 (2017)
Lund, A., Lund, M.: Kruskal-Wallis H test using SPSS statistics (2018). https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/kruskal-wallis-h-test-using-spss-statistics.php (2018)
Lund, A., Lund, M.: One-way anova (2018). https://statistics.laerd.com/ statistical-guides/one-way-anova-statistical-guide.php (2018)
Santo, L., Vallet, S., Raje, N.: Multiple myeloma. BMJ best practice. https://bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-us/179 (2018)
Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014)
Sopharak, A., Uyyanonvara, B., Barman, S.: Comparing SVM and Naive Bayes classifier for automatic microaneurysm detections. Int. J. Comput. Electr. Autom. Control Inf. Eng. 8(5), 797–800 (2014)
Turki, T., Wei, Z., Wang, J.T.: Transfer learning approaches to improve drug sensitivity prediction in multiple myeloma patients. IEEE Access 5, 7381–7393 (2017)
Ullah, R., Khan, S., Ali, H., Chaudhary, I.I., Bilal, M., Ahmad, I.: A comparative study of machine learning classifiers for risk prediction of asthma disease. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 28, 292–296 (2019)
Waddell, M., Page, D., Shaughnessy Jr, J.: Predicting cancer susceptibility from single-nucleotide polymorphism data: a case study in multiple myeloma. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Bioinformatics, pp. 21–28 (2005)
Wang, H., Zhou, Z., Li, Y., Chen, Z., Lu, P., Wang, W., Liu, W., Yu, L.: Comparison of machine learning methods for classifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer from 18 F-FDG PET/CT images. EJNMMI Res. 7(1), 1–11 (2017)
Wu, C.C., Yeh, W.C., Hsu, W.D., Islam, M.M., Nguyen, P.A.A., Poly, T.N., Wang, Y.C., Yang, H.C., Li, Y.C.J.: Prediction of fatty liver disease using machine learning algorithms. Comput. Meth. Prog. Biomed. 170, 23–29 (2019)
Xu, L., et al.: Automated whole-body bone lesion detection for multiple myeloma on 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT imaging using deep learning methods. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2018, 2391925 (2018)
Yadav, S.S., Jadhav, S.M.: Deep convolutional neural network based medical image classification for disease diagnosis. J. Big Data 6(1), 1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0276-2
Acknowledgements
This work is based on the research supported wholly/in part by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant Numbers 46712). Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. The authors also acknowledge the Sebia Group Cartridge for sponsoring the printing of the gel strips and graphs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marimuthu, L., Pillay, N., Punchoo, R., Bhoora, S. (2021). A Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnosing Multiple Myeloma. In: Rutkowski, L., Scherer, R., Korytkowski, M., Pedrycz, W., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zurada, J.M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. ICAISC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12855. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87897-9_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87897-9_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87896-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87897-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)