A Checklist for Explainable AI in the Insurance Domain | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

A Checklist for Explainable AI in the Insurance Domain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC 2021)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a powerful tool to accomplish a great many tasks. This exciting branch of technology is being adopted increasingly across varying sectors, including the insurance domain. With that power arise several complications. One of which is a lack of transparency and explainability of an algorithm for experts and non-experts alike. This brings into question both the usefulness as well as the accuracy of the algorithm, coupled with an added difficulty to assess potential biases within the data or the model. In this paper, we investigate the current usage of AI algorithms in the Dutch insurance industry and the adoption of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques. Armed with this knowledge we design a checklist for insurance companies that should help assure quality standards regarding XAI and a solid foundation for cooperation between organisations. This checklist extends an existing checklist that SIVI, the standardisation institute for digital cooperation and innovation in Dutch insurance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 13727
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Checklist-KOAT can be found at https://www.sivi.org/checklist-koat/.

References

  1. Barocas, S., Selbst, A.D.: Big data’s disparate impact. Calif. Law Rev. 104, 671 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barredo Arrieta, A., et al.: Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Inf. Fusion 58, 82–115 (2020). ISSN 1566-2535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566253519308103

  3. Van der Burgt, J.: General principles for the use of artificial intelligence in the financial sector (2019). https://www.dnb.nl/media/voffsric/general-principles-for-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-financial-sector.pdf. Guidance Document from De Nederlandsche Bank. Accessed 25 May 2021

  4. Castelvecchi, D.: Can we open the black box of AI? Nature 538(7623), 20–23 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/538020a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daley, S.: 32 examples of AI in healthcare that will make you feel better about the future (2019). https://builtin.com/artificial-intelligence/artificial-intelligence-healthcare. Accessed 25 May 2021

  6. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004). ISSN 02767783. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148625

  7. Kroes, M.: Fact-AI: a framework towards responsible AI (2020). https://www.viqtordavis.com/en-us/media/whitepaper-fact-ai. Whitepaper from Viqtor Davies. Accessed 25 May 2021

  8. Reisman, D., Schultz, J., Crawfordand, K., Whittaker, M.: Algorithmic impact assessments: a practical framework for public agency accountability (2018). https://ainowinstitute.org/aiareport2018.pdf. Report from AI Now Institute. Accessed 25 May 2021

  9. Serban, A., van der Blom, K., Hoos, H., Visser, J.: Practices for engineering trustworthy machine learning applications. In: 1st Workshop on AI Engineering, WAIN 2021 (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00964

  10. Tjoa, E., Guan, C.: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): toward medical XAI. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 1–21 (2020). ISSN 2162-2388. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2020.3027314

  11. Tomsett, R., Braines, D., Harborne, D., Preece, A., Chakraborty, S.: Interpretable to whom? A role-based model for analyzing interpretable machine learning systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.00184 (2018)

  12. Vilone, G., Longo, L.: Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Checklist for AI in Insurance Applications

Appendix: Checklist for AI in Insurance Applications

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Koster, O., Kosman, R., Visser, J. (2021). A Checklist for Explainable AI in the Insurance Domain. In: Paiva, A.C.R., Cavalli, A.R., Ventura Martins, P., Pérez-Castillo, R. (eds) Quality of Information and Communications Technology. QUATIC 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1439. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85347-1_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85347-1_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85346-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85347-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics