Abstract
A number of research and innovation projects aim to develop and demonstrate the benefits of novel solutions, in the particular case analysed in this paper – in the field of disaster or crisis management. The focus of the assessment of these solutions is on the benefits they bring by increasing the effectiveness and/or the performance of crisis management actors in a controlled environment. As a rule, little attention is given to safety and security considerations related to their intended use beyond trials and demonstrations, in an actual crisis management context. To speed up market uptake and innovation, this paper presents a technology-based classification of existing and potential solutions and a structure of their possible impact on safety and security. On that basis the authors identify pertinent ‘technology-impact’ combinations, list some relevant norms and standards for each such combination, and provide the outlines of three illustrative test cases. The paper concludes by a discussion on the implementation of the presented approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shi, P.: Hazards, disasters, and risks. In: Disaster Risk Science. IHDP/Future Earth-Integrated Risk Governance Project Series, pp. 1–48. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6689-5_1
Stäubli, A., Nussbaumer, S.U., Allen, S., Huggel, C., Wymann von Dach, S.: Diverse natural hazards – high human and economic losses. In: Wymann von Dach, S., et al. (eds.) Safer lives and livelihoods in mountains: making the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction work for sustainable mountain development, pp. 14–19. Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern, Bern (2017)
Chamlee-Wright, E., Storr, V.H.: Expectations of government’s response to disaster. Public Choice 144(1/2), 253–274 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9516-x
Jong, W., Dückers, M.L.A.: The perspective of the affected: what people confronted with disasters expect from government officials and public leaders. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 10(1), 14–31 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12150
Tagarev, T., Ratchev, V.: A taxonomy of crisis management functions. Sustainability 12(12), 5147 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125147
Caudle, S.: Homeland Security Capabilities-Based Planning: Lessons from the Defense Community. Homeland Security Affairs 1, Article 2 (2005). https://www.hsaj.org/articles/178
Keim, M.E.: An innovative approach to capability-based emergency operations planning. Disaster Health 1(1), 54–62 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4161/dish.23480
Bradley, D.J.: Applying the THIRA to special events: a framework for capabilities-based planning adoption in local governments. Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA (2018). https://www.hsaj.org/articles/14939
Nikolov, O.: Distributed training, CAX and experimentation in support of crisis management. Inf. Secur.: Int. J. 27(2), 138–146 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/isij.2713
Nikolov, O., Tomov, N., Nikolova, I.: M&S support for crisis and disaster management processes and climate change implications. In: Murayama, Y., Velev, D., Zlateva, P., Gonzalez, J.J. (eds.) ITDRR 2016. IAICT, vol. 501, pp. 240–253. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68486-4_19
Angevine, R.G.: Time to revive joint concept development and experimentation. War on the Rocks (23 January 2020). https://warontherocks.com/2020/01/time-to-revive-joint-concept-development-and-experimentation. Accessed 26 Oct 2020
Izumi, T., Shaw, R., Ishiwatari, M., Djalante, R., Komino, T.: 30 innovations for disaster risk reduction. IRIDeS, Keio University, The University of Tokyo, UNU-IAS, CWS Japan, Japan (2019)
What is DRIVER+?. https://www.driver-project.eu/driver-project/. Accessed 24 Oct 2020
AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe: STACCATO Final Taxonomy, Deliverable 1.2.2, STACCATO (Stakeholders Platform for Supply chain Mapping, Market condition Analysis and Technologies Opportunities) project (2007)
Sveinsdottir, T., et al.: Taxonomy of Security Products, Systems and Services, Deliverable 1.2, CRISP (Project title: Evaluation and Certification Schemes for Security Products) project (2014)
European Defence Agency: EDA Technology Taxonomy Overview (n.d.). https://www.eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/procurement/eda-technology-taxonomy.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2020
Duran, L.: Safety and Security – Preventing cybersecurity attacks in safety systems. Hazardex (2015). http://www.hazardexonthenet.net/article/105606/Safety-and-Security-Preventing-cybersecurity-attacks-in-safety-systems.aspx. Accessed 26 Oct 2020
Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection. Off. J. L 345, 75–82 (2008). http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/114/oj
Directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union. Off. J. L 194, 1–30 (2016). http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/1148/oj
Dubost, L., et al.: Solution testing procedure. DRIVER+ Deliverable D934.21. https://www.driver-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DRIVERPLUS_D934.21_Solution-testing-procedure.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2020
Acknowledgement
The research leading to these results was performed by the Centre for Security and Defence Management, Institute of ICT, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Thales Communications & Security, France, as part of the DRIVER+ project and has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement no. 607798.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tagarev, T., Ivanova, P., Dubost, L., Dangerville, C. (2021). Towards Safety and Security-Related Testing of Crisis Management Solutions. In: Murayama, Y., Velev, D., Zlateva, P. (eds) Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction. ITDRR 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 622. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81469-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81469-4_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81468-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81469-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
