Abstract
Learning in university setting includes the challenging task of self-motivation of the learner. The use of social robots has been shown to support the learner in their social learning process. In this paper, we address the motivation of learners in terms of self-determination theory as a theoretical framework to address need satisfaction. To this end, we conducted a field study using an adaptive robotic tutor that supports learners in exam preparation using an online learning session. With the aim to not only benefit motivation, but also academic success, we draw from research in social robotics in education as well as from adaptive tutoring, to create an adequate learning scenario. Adaptation is realized by a simple content and learner model and resulted in a significantly higher perceived use of the tutoring compared to a control condition. Our results also showed descriptive benefits such as increased perceived tutor quality, need satisfaction and motivation resulting from the adaptive tutoring. Finally, we found significantly better exam performance with the robotic tutor in the adaptive or non-adaptive version relative to students not participating in the robotic tutoring.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Nao robot: https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/nao.
- 2.
Zoom: https://zoom.us/.
References
Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(1), 71–81 (2009)
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., Tanaka, F.: Social robots for education: a review. Sci. Robot. 3(21), eaat5954 (2018)
Breazeal, C., Dautenhahn, K., Kanda, T.: Social robotics. In: Siciliano, B., Khatib, O. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 1935–1972. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_72
Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inquiry 11(4), 227–268 (2000)
Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., Williams, G.C.: Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learn. Individ. Differences 8(3), 165–183 (1996)
Deci, E.L., Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., Ryan, R.M.: Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective. Educ. Psychol. 26(3–4), 325–346 (1991)
Deublein, A., Pfeifer, A., Merbach, K., Bruckner, K., Mengelkamp, C., Lugrin, B.: Scaffolding of motivation in learning using a social robot. Comput. Educ. 100(125), 182–190 (2018)
Donnermann, M., Schaper, P., Lugrin, B.: Integrating a social robot in higher education - a field study. In: 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 573–579. IEEE (2020)
Guay, F., Vallerand, R.J., Blanchard, C.: On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: the situational motivation scale (sims). Motiv. Emot. 24(3), 175–213 (2000)
Kennedy, J., Baxter, P., Belpaeme, T.: The robot who tried too hard: social behaviour of a robot tutor can negatively affect child learning. In: 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 67–74. IEEE (2015)
Leyzberg, D., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B.: The effect of personalization in longer-term robot tutoring. ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact. (THRI) 7(3), 1–19 (2018)
Leyzberg, D., Spaulding, S., Scassellati, B.: Personalizing robot tutors to individuals’ learning differences. In: 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 423–430. IEEE (2014)
Leyzberg, D., Spaulding, S., Toneva, M., Scassellati, B.: The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 34 (2012)
Li, J.: The benefit of being physically present: a survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 77, 23–37 (2015)
Pfeifer, A., Lugrin, B.: Female robots as role-models? - the influence of robot gender and learning materials on learning success. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10948, pp. 276–280. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_51
Phobun, P., Vicheanpanya, J.: Adaptive intelligent tutoring systems for e-learning systems. Proc.-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2(2), 4064–4069 (2010)
Rosenberg-Kima, R., Koren, Y., Yachini, M., Gordon, G.: Human-robot-collaboration (hrc): Social robots as teaching assistants for training activities in small groups. In: 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 522–523, March 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673103
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford Publications (2017)
Ryan, R.M., Mims, V., Koestner, R.: Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: a review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45(4), 736 (1983)
Saerbeck, M., Schut, T., Bartneck, C., Janse, M.D.: Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1613–1622 (2010)
Schodde, T., Bergmann, K., Kopp, S.: Adaptive robot language tutoring based on bayesian knowledge tracing and predictive decision-making. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 128–136 (2017)
Sheldon, K.M., Filak, V.: Manipulating autonomy, competence, and relatedness support in a game-learning context: new evidence that all three needs matter. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 47(2), 267–283 (2008)
Teo, T.: Development and validation of the e-learning acceptance measure (ELAM). Internet High. Educ. 13(3), 148–152 (2010)
Tiberius, R.G., Billson, J.M.: The social context of teaching and learning. New Directions Teach. Learn. 1991(45), 67–86 (1991)
Velez, J.J., Cano, J.: The relationship between teacher immediacy and student motivation. J. Agric. Educ. 49(3), 76–86 (2008)
Witt, P.L., Wheeless, L.R., Allen, M.: A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Commun. Monogr. 71(2), 184–207 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Donnermann, M., Schaper, P., Lugrin, B. (2021). Towards Adaptive Robotic Tutors in Universities: A Field Study. In: Ali, R., Lugrin, B., Charles, F. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79460-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79460-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79459-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79460-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)